Timing matters in relationships. People vary in their sense of when they think the time is right to be involved in a committed relationship. We propose and examine the construct of commitment readiness and its role in predicting important relationship outcomes including commitment level, maintenance processes, and stability among involved intimates. Data from five independent samples obtained with various methods revealed, as hypothesized, that readiness (a) predicts commitment, maintenance processes, and actions toward ending a relationship; (b) serves to moderate commitment in predicting maintenance processes (self-disclosure, accommodation, sacrifice); and (c) serves to moderate commitment in predicting leave behavior, with those reporting both higher commitment and higher readiness being more likely to enact maintenance behaviors and least likely to enact leave behavior. We discuss the importance of considering one’s readiness for commitment within ongoing involvements.
AgnewC. R. (2014a). Relationship receptivity: Commitment in a changing world. Invited keynote address presented at the 2014 International Association of Relationship Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
2.
AgnewC. R. (Ed.). (2014b). Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AgnewC. R.ArriagaX. B.GoodfriendW. (2006, July). On the (mis)measurement of premarital relationship breakup. Paper presented at the International Association for Relationship Research, Rethymno, Crete, Greece.
4.
AgnewC. R.HaddenB. W.TanK. (in press). Relationship receptivity theory: Timing in close relationships. In VanderDriftL. E.ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (Eds.), Interdependence, interaction, and close relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AgnewC. R.LovingT. J.DrigotasS. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1057. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1042
6.
AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E. (2018). Commitment processes in personal relationship. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 437–448). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
AronA.DuttonD. G.AronE. N.IversonA. (1989). Experiences of falling in love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 243–257. doi:10.1177/0265407589063001
9.
ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203. doi:10.1177/0146167201279011
10.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
BolgerN.StadlerG.LaurenceauJ. P. (2012). Power analysis for intensive longitudinal studies. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 285–301). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100. doi:10.1037/a0015914
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
15.
HaddenB. W.AgnewC. R.TanK. (2018). Commitment readiness and relationship formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1242–125.
16.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multi-level modelling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314–323. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
17.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00035
18.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
19.
NorcrossJ. C.KrebsP. M.ProchaskaJ. O. (2011), Stages of change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 143–154. doi:10.1002/jclp.20758
20.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (2005). The transtheoretical approach. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (2nd ed., pp. 147–171). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
RielaS.RodriguezG.AronA.XuX.AcevadoB. P. (2010). Experiences of falling in love: Investigating culture, ethnicity, gender, and speed. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 473–493. doi:10.1177/0265407510363508
22.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC. R. (2010). Prosocial motivation and behavior in close relationships. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior (pp. 327–345). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC. R.ArriagaX. B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
24.
RusbultC. E.BissonnetteV. I.ArriagaX. B.CoxC. L. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. In BradburyT. N. (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 74–113). New York, NY: Cambridge.
25.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
26.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
27.
SprecherS.FelmleeD.OrbuchT. L.WilletsM. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In VangelistiA. L.ReisH. T.FitzpatrickM. A. (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SprecherS.HendrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.
29.
TanK.AgnewC. R.HaddenB. W. (in press). Seeking and ensuring interdependence: Desiring commitment and the strategic initiation and maintenance of close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
30.
ThorndikeE (1999). Education psychology. New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1913)
31.
VanderDriftL. E.AgnewC. R. (2014). Relational consequences of personal goal pursuits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 927–940. doi:10.1037/a0036180
32.
WeinerB. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
33.
WickhamR. E.KneeC. R. (2013). Examining temporal processes in diary studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1184–1198. doi:10.1177/0146167213490962
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
