When Whites believe prejudice cannot change, they often adopt a behavioral style that is intended to reduce the possibility that they are seen as racist (i.e., performance-oriented behaviors). The present research tests the possibility that these performance-oriented behaviors may be interpreted, ironically, as racist. Across two studies, Black participants viewed performance-oriented behaviors as indicating racial prejudice. Additionally, when Black participants were led to believe that Whites’ racial prejudice could not change, they perceived Whites as more prejudiced. This research highlights a potential source of misunderstanding in interracial interactions and offers implications for improving interracial interactions from target and perpetrator perspectives.
ApfelbaumE. P.SommersS. R.NortonM. I. (2008). Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 918–932. doi:10.1037/a0011990
2.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
3.
BrighamJ. C. (1993). College students’ racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933–1967. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01074.x
4.
CarrP. B.DweckC. S.PaukerK. (2012). “Prejudiced” behavior without prejudice? Beliefs about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 452–471. doi:10.1037/a0028849
5.
CortlandC. I.CraigM. A.ShapiroJ. R.RichesonJ. A.NeelR.GoldsteinN. J. (2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 547–567. doi:10.1037/pspi0000100
6.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
7.
CrockerJ.MajorB.SteeleC. (1998). Social stigma. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 504–553). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
CroftA.SchmaderT. (2012). The feedback withholding bias: Minority students do not receive critical feedback from evaluators concerned about appearing racist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1139–1144. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.010
9.
DovidioJ. F. (2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 829–849. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00244
10.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
11.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
14.
Feldman-BarrettL.SwimJ. K. (1998). Appraisals of prejudice and discrimination. In SwimJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 11–36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
FrantzC. M.CuddyA. C.BurnettM.RayH.HartA. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611–1624. doi:10.1177/0146167204266650
16.
GoffP. A.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91
17.
HarberK. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622–628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.622
18.
HarberK. D.GormanJ. L.GengaroF. P.ButisinghS.TsangW.OuelletteR. (2012). Students’ race and teachers’ social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1149–1161. doi:10.1037/a0028110
19.
HoloienD. S.BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.AlegreJ. M. (2015). Do you really understand? Achieving accuracy in interracial relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 76–92. doi:10.1037/pspi0000003
20.
KruegerJ. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536–548. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.536
21.
LaCosseJ.TuschererT.KunstmanJ. W.PlantE. A.TrawalterS.MajorB. (2015). Suspicion of White people’s motives relates to relative accuracy in detecting external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.003
22.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006
23.
MajorB.KunstmanJ. W.MaltaB. D.SawyerP. J.TownsendS. S.MendesW. B. (2016). Suspicion of motives predicts minorities’ responses to positive feedback in interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 75–88. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.007
24.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80007-7
25.
MajorB.SawyerP. J.KunstmanJ. W. (2013). Minority perceptions of Whites’ motives for responding without prejudice: The perceived internal and external motivation to avoid prejudice scales. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 401–414. doi:10.1177/0146167213475367
26.
MigachevaK.TroppL. R. (2013). Learning orientation as a predictor of positive intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 426–444. doi:10.1177/1368430212455854
27.
MurphyM. C.RichesonJ. A.MoldenD. C. (2011). Leveraging motivational mindsets to foster positive interracial interactions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 118–131. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00338.x
28.
NeelR.ShapiroJ. R. (2012). Is racial bias malleable? Whites’ lay theories of racial bias predict divergent strategies for interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 101–120. doi:10.1037/a0028237
29.
NelsonJ. C.AdamsG.SalterP. S. (2013). The Marley hypothesis: Denial of racism reflects ignorance of history. Psychological Science, 24, 213–218. doi:10.1177/0956797612451466
30.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215–218. doi:10.1177/1745691611406922
31.
NortonM. I.VandelloJ. A.BigaA.DarleyJ. M. (2008). Colorblindness and diversity: Conflicting goals in decisions influenced by race. Social Cognition, 26, 102–111. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.102
32.
O’BrienL. T.BlodornA.AlsbrooksA.DubeR.AdamsG.NelsonJ. C. (2009). Understanding White Americans’ perceptions of racism in hurricane Katrina-related events. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 431–444. doi:10.1177/1368430209105047
PlantE. A.ButzD. A. (2006). The causes and consequences of an avoidance focus for interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 833–846. doi:10.1177/0146167206287182
35.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790–801. doi:10.1177/0146167203029006011
36.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444–446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
37.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2005). Brief report: Thin slices of racial bias. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 75–86. doi:10.1007/s10919-004-0890-2
38.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x
39.
RuscherJ. B.WallaceD. L.WalkerK. M.BellL. H. (2010). Constructive feedback in cross-race interactions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 603–619. doi:10.1177/1368430210364629
40.
SaguyT.TauschN.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
41.
SellersR. M.SheltonJ. N. (2003). The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1079–1092. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1079
42.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 121–181). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3
43.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 243–268. doi:10.1177/1088868309345850
44.
VorauerJ. D.KumhyrS. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self-versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706–719. doi:10.1177/0146167201276006
45.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
46.
WinslowM. P.AaronA.AmadifeE. N. (2011). African Americans’ lay theories about the detection of prejudice and nonprejudice. Journal of Black Studies, 42, 43–70. doi:10.1177/002193470935702
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
