We investigated whether motivated reasoning rooted in partisanship affects the attributions individuals make about violent attackers’ underlying motives and group memberships. Study 1 demonstrated that on the day of the Brexit referendum pro-leavers (vs. pro-remainers) attributed an exculpatory (i.e., mental health) versus condemnatory (i.e., terrorism) motive to the killing of a pro-remain politician. Study 2 demonstrated that pro-immigration (vs. anti-immigration) perceivers in Germany ascribed a mental health (vs. terrorism) motive to a suicide attack by a Syrian refugee, predicting lower endorsement of punitiveness against his group (i.e., refugees) as a whole. Study 3 experimentally manipulated target motives, showing that Americans distanced a politically motivated (vs. mentally ill) violent individual from their in-group and assigned him harsher punishment—patterns most pronounced among high-group identifiers.
ButlerA. (2015, 618). Shooters of color are called ‘terrorists’ and ‘thugs.’ Why are white shooters called ‘mentally ill’?Washington Post. Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com
5.
DalbyJ. T. (2006). The case of Daniel McNaughton: Let’s get the story straight. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 27, 17–32.
6.
DarleyJ. M.PittmanT. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_05
7.
DelacreM.LakensD.LeysC. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 92–101. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82
8.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.872
9.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
10.
FoxB. (2016, 613). Orlando shooter’s imam blames mental illness: ‘This has nothing to do with ISIS’. Talking Points Memo. Retrieved fromhttp://talkingpointsmemo.com
HartmanT. K.NewmarkA. J. (2012). Motivated reasoning, political sophistication, and associations between President Obama and Islam. Political Science & Politics, 45, 449–455. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000327
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HulsizerM. R.MunroG. D.FagerlinA.TaylorS. P. (2004). Molding the past: Biased assimilation of historical information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1048–1074. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02583.x
KassamR. (2016, 926). ‘Emotions, revenge, repressed homosexuality’…How the media covered for Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen. Breitbart. Retrieved fromhttp://www.breitbart.com
17.
KruglanskiA. W.FreundT. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7
18.
KteilyN.CotterillS.SidaniusJ.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.BerghR. (2014). “Not one of us”: Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1231–1247. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214539708
KundraZ.SinclairL. (1999). Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: Activation, application, and inhibition. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 12–22. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_2
21.
LewisA. C.ShermanS. J. (2010). Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: When will we denigrate negative ingroup members?The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 211–225. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366388
22.
LickelB.MillerN.StenstromD. M.DensonT. F.SchmaderT. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372–390. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6
23.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
26.
MunroG. D.WeihC.TsaiJ. (2010). Motivated suspicion: Asymmetrical attributions of the behaviour of political ingroup and outgroup members. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 173–184. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01973531003738551
27.
MusgroveL.McGartyC. (2008). Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of collective emotional responses and support for pro- and anti-war action. Social Psychology, 39, 37–47. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.1.37
28.
PiddH. (2016, 617). Suspect in Jo Cox’s killing described as quiet, polite and reserved. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/
29.
PilkingtonE.RobertsD. (2016, 614). FBI and Obama confirm Omar Mateen was radicalized on the internet. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com
30.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4a
31.
SchwarzerR.WeinerB. (1991). Stigma controllability and coping as predictors of emotions and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 133–140. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591081007
32.
SelodS. (2015). Citizenship denied: The racialization of Muslim American men and women post-9/11. Critical Sociology, 41, 77–95. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513516022
33.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.Rios-MorrisonK. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice (pp. 44–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 115–134. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x313774
35.
WeaverM.FarrerM. (2016, 725). Ansbach bombing: Attacker pledged allegiance to Isis, says official—As it happened. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com
36.
WeinerB. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.39.2.186
37.
WeinerB.OsborneD.RudolphU. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 199–213. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310387615
38.
WeinerB.PerryR. P.MagnussonJ. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.738
39.
YzerbytV.CastanoE.LeyensJ. P.PaladinoM. P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257–295. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000059
40.
ZickA.KrauseD.KüpperB. (2016). Gespaltene Mitte—Feindselige Zustände: Rechtspopulistische und rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland[Right-wing populist and right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
