This research used intensive longitudinal methods to examine a motivated cognition perspective on intention–behavior discrepancies. We propose that under conditions of high performance, people are more inclined to evaluate their efforts in light of their intentions; thus, discrepancies between intentions and performance should have stronger impacts on goal-related affect under conditions of high (vs. low) performance. Secondary data analyses were conducted on two daily-diary studies in which participants reported their exercise, goal-related affect, and next-day intentions across 14 days. Under conditions of low performance, people felt negative about their performance irrespective of whether they typically set low versus high intentions. On days with high performance, average intentions significantly related to affect, such that those with low average intentions experienced the greatest satisfaction. Additionally, we observed that average (between-person) affect, but not within-person fluctuations in affect, predicted daily levels of exercise behavior. Implications for self-regulatory theories of affect are discussed.
BemD. J.McConnellH. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 23–31.
4.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
5.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BradleyM.LangP. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.
7.
BrocknerJ.HigginsE. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 35–66.
8.
BrownJ.DuttonK. (1995). Truth and consequences: The costs and benefits of accurate self-knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1288–1296.
9.
CarverC. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 241–261.
10.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality, social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.
11.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ConwayM.RossM. (1984). Getting what you want by revising what you had. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 738–748.
13.
CraigC.MarshallA.SjöstromM.BaumanA.BoothM.AinsworthB.…OjaP. (2003). International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 195, 1381–1395.
14.
CritcherC.FergusonM. (2011). Affect in the abstract: Abstract mindsets promote sensitivity to affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1185–1191.
15.
DishmanR. K.SallisJ. F.OrensteinD. R. (1985). The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Reports, 100, 158–171.
16.
DuvalS.WicklundR. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York, NY: Academic Press.
17.
DuvalS.DuvalV.NeelyR. (1979). Self-focus, felt responsibility and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1769–1778.
18.
DweckC. S.HongY.ChiuC. (1993). Implicit theories individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644–656.
19.
FejfarM. C.HoyleR. H. (2000). Effect of private self-awareness on negative affect and self-referent attribution: A quantitative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 132–142.
20.
FishbeinM. (1980). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. In HoweH.PageM. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 65–116). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
FreitasA.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
22.
GollwitzerP. M.MoskowitzG. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
24.
HigginsE. T.KleinR.StraumanT. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51–76.
25.
HillR. W.HuelsmanT. J.FurrR. M.KiblerJ.VicenteB. B.KennedyC. (2004). A new measure of perfectionism: The perfectionism inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 80–91.
26.
HudsonN. W.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2017). Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A 2-year longitudinal study of well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 45–54.
27.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412.
28.
IliesR.JudgeT. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467.
29.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
30.
KwanB. M.BryanA. D. (2010). Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: Attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 71–79.
31.
LeithS. A.WardC. L.GiacominM.LandauE. S.EhrlingerJ.WilsonA. E. (2014). Changing theories of change: Strategic shifting in implicit theory endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 597–620.
32.
LouroM. J.PietersR.ZeelenbergM. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.
33.
MalinaR. M. (1996). Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness across the lifespan. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, S48–S57.
34.
MoskalenkoS.HeineS. J. (2003). Watching your troubles away: Television viewing as a stimulus for subjective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 76–85.
35.
OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2001). Goal setting and goal striving. In TesserA.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Blackwell book of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 329–348). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
36.
OlsonJ. M.CalA. (1984). Source credibility, attitudes, and the recall of past behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 203–210.
37.
RogersT.MilkmanK. L. (2016). Reminders through association. Psychological Science, 27, 973–986.
38.
RogersT.MilkmanK. L.JohnL. K.NortonM. I. (2015). Beyond good intentions: Prompting people to make plans improves follow-through on important tasks. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1, 33–41.
39.
RossM.McFarlandC.ConwayM.ZannaM. P. (1983). Reciprocal relation between attitudes and behavior recall: Committing people to newly formed attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 257–267.
40.
RossM.ShulmanR. F. (1973). Increasing the salience of initial attitudes: Dissonance versus self-perception theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 138–144.
41.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
42.
SallisJ. F.ProchaskaJ. J.TaylorW. C. (2000). A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, 963–975.
43.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention–behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–36). London, England: Wiley.
44.
SjöströmM.AinsworthB.BaumanA.BullF.CraigC.SallisJ. (2005). Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the Intentional Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) e Short and long forms. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute.
45.
SweeneyA. M. (2016). The making of a habit: The moderating role of construal level on the development of automaticity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stony Brook University, New York, NY.
46.
SweeneyA. M.WilsonD. K.Van HornM. L. (2017). Longitudinal relationships between self-concept for physical activity and neighborhood social life as predictors of physical activity among older African American adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, 67.
47.
TangneyJ. P.NiedenthalP. M.CovertM. V.BarlowD. H. (1998). Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins’s (1987) hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 256–268.
48.
TwengeJ. M.CataneseK. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 409–423.
49.
VallacherR.WegnerD. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.
50.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.
51.
WichstrømL.von SoestT.KvalemI. L. (2013). Predictors of growth and decline in leisure time physical activity from adolescence to adulthood. Health Psychology, 32, 775–784.
52.
WilliamsD. M.DunsigerS.CiccoloJ. T.LewisB. A.AlbrechtA. E.MarcusB. H. (2008). Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 231–245.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
