Sexist ideologies maintain and reinforce gender inequality, yet the stability of these belief systems is unknown. We addressed this oversight by examining changes in men’s and women’s hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS)—complementary gender-based belief systems, respectively, rooted in punitive and protective (albeit restrictive) attitudes toward women—using seven annual waves of longitudinal panel data (N = 15,626). Autoregressive cross-lagged models examined the rank-order stability of BS and HS, whereas latent growth models examined mean-level changes in both ideologies for men and women from 2009 to 2016. Results indicated that both BS and HS demonstrated high levels of rank-order stability across time for men and women. Nevertheless, women and men experienced mean-level curvilinear decreases in HS characterized by initial sharp declines that decelerated over time. Conversely, women’s mean-level BS initially declined slowly before gradually accelerating, whereas men’s mean-level HS decreased linearly. Together, these results indicate that sexism decreased over time.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. doi:10.1002/ejsp.270
2.
BerkowitzA. D. (2003). Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. In PerkinsH. W. (Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 259–279). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BrandtM. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418. doi:10.1177/0956797611420445
4.
BraunM.JacquelineS. (2009). Changing public views of gender roles in seven nations, 1988-2002. In HallerM.JowellR.SmithT. W. (Eds.), The International Social Survey Programme 1984-2009: Charting the Globe (pp. 358–377). Oxford: Routledge.
5.
BrewsterK. L.PadavicI. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 477–487. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x
6.
BrooksC.BolzendahlC. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3
7.
CotterD.HermsenJ. M.VannemanR. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259–289. doi:10.1086/658853
8.
CunninghamM. (2008). Changing attitudes toward the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model: Influences of women’s employment and education over the lifecourse. Social Forces, 87, 299–323. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0097
9.
DonnellyK.TwengeJ. M.ClarkM. A.ShaikhS. K.Beiler-MayA.CarterN. T. (2015). Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 41–54. doi:10.1177/0361684315590774
10.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
11.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037/0003- 066X.56.2.109
12.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.…LópezW. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
13.
GrimmK. J.RamN.EstabrookR. (2017). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
GrimmK. J.WidamanK. F. (2010). Residual structures in latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 424–442. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.489006
15.
GubernskayaZ. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53, 179–200. doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179
16.
HammondM. D.MilojevP.HuangY.SibleyC. G. (2017). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550617727588
17.
HuangY.DaviesP. G.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 970–984. doi:10.1177/0146167216649607
KilianskiS. E.RudmanL. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?Sex Roles, 39, 333–352. doi:10.1023/A:1018814924402
20.
KilmartinC.SmithT.GreenA.HeinzenH.KuchlerM.KolarD. (2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59, 264–273. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9446-y
21.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
22.
SatherleyN.MilojevP.GreavesL. M.HuangY.OsborneD.BulbuliaJ.SibleyC. G. (2015). Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. PLoS One, 10, e0121950. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121950
23.
ScottJ. (2008). Changing gender role attitudes. In ScottJ.DexS.JoshiH. (Eds.), Women and employment: Changing lives and new challenges (pp. 156–178). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
24.
SeligJ.LittleT. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
SibleyC. G.BeckerJ. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 589–601. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1870
26.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C.DuckittJ. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1
27.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C.DuckittJ.PerryR.MilfontT. L.KhanS. S.…RobertsonA. (2009). Your sexism predicts my sexism: Perceptions of men’s (but not women’s) sexism affects one’s own sexism over time. Sex Roles, 60, 682–693. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9554-8
TwengeJ. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00099.x
30.
Van EgmondM.BaxterJ.BuchlerS.WesternM. (2010). A stalled revolution? Gender role attitudes in Australia, 1986–2005. Journal of Population Research, 27, 147–168. doi:10.1007/s12546-010-9039-9
31.
VikiG. T.AbramsD. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293. doi:10.1023/A:1021342912248
YuW.LeeP. (2013). Decomposing gender beliefs: Cross-national differences in attitudes toward maternal employment and gender equality at home. Sociological Inquiry, 83, 591–621. doi:10.1111/soin.12013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
