Most people report that they are superior to the average person on various moral traits. The psychological causes and social consequences of this phenomenon have received considerable empirical attention. The behavioral correlates of self-perceived moral superiority (SPMS), however, remain unknown. We present the results of two preregistered studies (Study 1, N = 827; Study 2, N = 825), in which we indirectly assessed participants’ SPMS and used two incentivized economic games to measure their engagement in moral behavior. Across studies, SPMS was unrelated to trust in others and to trustworthiness, as measured by the trust game, and unrelated to fairness, as measured by the dictator game. This pattern of findings was robust to a range of analyses, and, in both studies, Bayesian analyses indicated moderate support for the null over the alternative hypotheses. We interpret and discuss these findings and highlight interesting avenues for future research on this topic.
BarrantiM.CarlsonE. N.FurrR. M. (2016). Disagreement about moral character is linked to interpersonal costs. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 806–817. doi:10.1177%2F1948550616662127
6.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027
7.
BenzM.MeierS. (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics, 11, 268–281. doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9192-y
8.
BlantonH.BuunkB. P.GibbonsF. X.KuyperH. (1999). When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 420–430. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.420
9.
BrownJ. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209–219. doi:10.1177/0146167211432763
10.
BrülhartM.UsunierJ. C. (2012). Does the trust game measure trust?Economics Letters, 115, 20–23. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.039
ChambersJ. R.WindschitlP. D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813–838. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
13.
ChandlerJ.PaolacciG.PeerE.MuellerP.RatliffK. A. (2015). Using nonnaive participants can reduce effect sizes. Psychological Science, 26, 1131–1139. doi:10.1177%2F0956797615585115
14.
ChandlerJ.ShapiroD. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 53–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623
15.
EngelC. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583–610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
16.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861–875. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
18.
FehrE.LeibbrandtA. (2011). A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1144–1155. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.013
19.
FehrE.SchmidtK. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. doi:10.1162/003355399556151
20.
FetchenhauerD.DunningD. (2006). Perceptions of prosociality and solidarity in self and others. In FetchenhauerD.FlacheA.BuunkB.LindenbergS. (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior (pp. 61–74). New York, NY: Springer.
21.
FetchenhauerD.DunningD. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little?Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263–276. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.04.006
22.
FetchenhauerD.DunningD. (2010). Why so cynical? Asymmetric feedback underlies misguided skepticism regarding the trustworthiness of others. Psychological Science, 21, 189–193. doi:10.1177%2F0956797609358586
23.
FranzenA.PointnerS. (2013). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16, 155–169. doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9337-5
24.
GalizziM. M.Navarro-MartinezD. (in press). On the external validity of social preference games: A systematic lab-field study. Management Science.
25.
HeckP. R.KruegerJ. I. (2015). Self-enhancement diminished. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1003–1020. doi:10.1037/xge0000105
26.
HeckP. R.KruegerJ. I. (2016). Social perception of self-enhancement bias and error. Social Psychology, 47, 327–339. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000287
27.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4–27. doi:10.1177%2F1088868306294587
28.
HenrichJ.McElreathR.BarrA.EnsmingerJ.BarrettC.BolyanatzA.…LesorogolC. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312, 1767–1770. doi:10.1126/science.1127333
29.
HilbigB. E.ZettlerI.LeistF.HeydaschT. (2013). It takes two: Honesty–humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 598–603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008
30.
JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.1.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
31.
JohnsonN. D.MislinA. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
KleinN.EpleyN. (2016). Maybe holier, but definitely less evil, than you: Bounded self-righteousness in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 660–674. doi:10.1037/pspa0000050
34.
KleinN.EpleyN. (2017). Less evil than you: Bounded self-righteousness in character inferences, emotional reactions, and behavioral extremes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167217711918
35.
KruegerJ. I.AcevedoM. (2007). Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner’s dilemma: Outcome bias and evidential reasoning. The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 593–618. doi:http://www.jstor.org/stable/20445427
36.
KruegerJ. I.DiDonatoT. E. (2010). Perceptions of morality and competence in (non) interdependent games. Acta Psychologica, 134, 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.010
37.
KruegerJ. I.MasseyA. L.DiDonatoT. E. (2008). A matter of trust: From social preferences to the strategic adherence to social norms. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 31–52. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00003.x
38.
MillerD. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1090. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1053
39.
O’MaraE. M.GaertnerL. (2017). Does self-enhancement facilitate task performance?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 442–455. doi:10.1037/xge0000272
40.
PeysakhovichA.NowakM. A.RandD. G. (2014). Humans display a “cooperative phenotype” that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5, 4939. doi:10.1038/ncomms5939
41.
RandD. G. (2012). The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
42.
RandD. G.BrescollV. L.EverettJ. A.CapraroV.BarceloH. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 389–396. doi:10.1037/xge0000154
43.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.R-project.org/
44.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.CaiH. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 185–241). doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002
45.
SedikidesC.MeekR.AlickeM. D.TaylorS. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 396–403. doi:10.1111/bjso.12060
46.
SedikidesC.StrubeM. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
47.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayS. D. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1–6. doi:10.1177/1745691617708630
48.
SimpsonB.HarrellA.WillerR. (2013). Hidden paths from morality to cooperation: Moral judgments promote trust and trustworthiness. Social Forces, 91, 1529–1548. doi:muse.jhu.edu/article/509346
49.
StrohmingerN.NicholsS. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159–171. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005
50.
StrohmingerN.NicholsS. (2015). Neurodegeneration and identity. Psychological Science, 26, 1469–1479. doi:10.1177%2F0956797615592381
51.
TappinB. M.McKayR. T. (2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550616673878
52.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
53.
Van DammeC.DeschrijverE.Van GeertE.HoorensV. (2017). When praising yourself insults others: Self-superiority claims provoke aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167217703951
54.
Van DammeC.HoorensV.SedikidesC. (2016). Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claims. Self and Identity, 15, 173–190. doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1095232
55.
Van LangeP. A.SedikidesC. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675–680. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<675::AID-EJSP883>3.0.CO;2-5
56.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 605–620. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x
57.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
