Domineering Dispositions and Hierarchy Preferences: Differentiating the Impact of Traits and Social Values in Economic Games

Abstract

In this article, we examined the relation between valuing hierarchies (dominant value orientations) and personally wanting to get ahead, without regard for others’ welfare (domineering dispositions). Survey data from five studies (total N > 1,500) indicated differences between being domineering and endorsing dominant value orientations. This distinction was also evident in different strategies in economic games. Domineering individuals typically gave less to a powerless player (dictator game) but changed behaviors when the other party possessed bargaining power (ultimatum game). Individuals endorsing dominant value orientations did not show such “exploitative opportunism.” In a third-party punishment task, in contrast, individuals with dominant value orientations were more likely to intervene against fair decisions (i.e., upholding inequalities between others). Correcting behaviors of others were not predicted by domineering dispositions. We discuss implications for distinguishing between traits and social values more broadly.

Keywords

domineering dispositions social dominance economic games traits social values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Kilduff

G. J.

(2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. http://doi:org/10.1037/a0014201

Baumert

Schmitt

Perugini

Johnson

Blum

Borkenau

Wrzus

(2017a). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115

Baumert

Schmitt

Perugini

Johnson

Blum

Borkenau

Wrzus

(2017b). Working towards integration of personality structure, process, and development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 577–595. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2128

Bilsky

Schwartz

S. H

. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080303

Borkenau

Ostendorf

(1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90065-Y

Cambridge English Dictionary. (n.d.). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/domineering

Cattell

R. B.

Eber

H. W.

Tatsuoka

M. M.

(1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF): In clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Henrich

(2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902

10.

Christopher

A. N.

Zabel

K. L.

Jones

J. R.

(2008). Conscientiousness and work ethic ideology. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.4.189

11.

DeYoung

C. G.

Quilty

L. C.

Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880

12.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6

13.

Dweck

C. S.

(2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082

14.

Ekehammar

Akrami

Gylje

Zakrisson

I. B.

(2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526

15.

Engel

(2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583–610. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7

16.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1954). The psychology of politics. Routledge.

17.

Faul

ErdFelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

18.

Fehr

Fischbacher

(2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4

19.

Forsythe

Horowitz

J. L.

Savin

N. E.

Sefton

(1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369. http://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021

20.

Gough

H. G.

Bradley

(2005). CPI 260: Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.

21.

Gough

H. G.

McClosky

Meehl

P. E.

(1951). A personality scale for dominance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 360–366. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0062542

22.

Grina

Bergh

Akrami

Sidanius

(2016). Political orientation and dominance: Are people on the political right more dominant? Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 113–117. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.015

23.

Gurtman

M. B.

(2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00172.x

24.

Güth

Schmittberger

Schwarze

(1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

25.

Hawley

(1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. http://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470

26.

Henrich

Gil-White

F. J.

(2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4

27.

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003

28.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

29.

Hodson

Hogg

S. M.

MacInnis

C. C.

(2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005

30.

Kandler

Zimmermann

McAdams

D. P.

(2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1952

31.

Locke

K. D.

(2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6

32.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr . (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–180). Guilford.

33.

Marsh

H. W.

Nagengast

Morin

A. J. S.

(2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913

34.

McFarland

(2010). Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and Other Roots of Generalized Prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765

35.

Meredith

(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825

36.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2002). How to use a Monte Carlo Study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

37.

Nowak

M. A.

Page

K. M.

Sigmund

(2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289, 1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1773

38.

Oxoby

R. J.

McLeish

K. N.

(2004). Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Economics Letters, 84, 399–405. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.011

39.

Parks

Guay

R. P.

(2009). Personality, values, and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 675–684. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.002

40.

Parks-Leduc

Feldman

Bardi

(2014). Personality traits and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 3–29. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538548

41.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

42.

Reynolds

K. J.

Turner

J. C.

Haslam

S. A.

Ryan

M. K.

(2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1473

43.

Roccas

Sagiv

Schwartz

S. H.

Knafo

(2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008

44.

Rokeach

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

(1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968–1981. American Psychologist, 44, 775–784. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.775

45.

Saroglou

(2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 108–125. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352322

46.

Schuster

(2017). A new solution concept for the ultimatum game leading to the golden ratio. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 5642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05122-5

47.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna

(Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press.

48.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226

49.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365364

50.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: A longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 448–466. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.757544

51.

Sidanius

Cotterill

Sheehy-Skeffington

Kteily

Carvacho

(2016). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook on the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). Cambridge University Press.

52.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

A. K.

Sibley

Duriez

(2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313–323. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008

53.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

54.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395

55.

Wiggins

J. S.

Trapnell

Phillips

(1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8

56.

Witkower

Tracy

J. L.

Cheng

J. T.

Henrich

(2020). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000181

57.

Wood

Gardner

M. H.

Harms

P. D.

(2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038423

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB