In this article, we examined the relation between valuing hierarchies (dominant value orientations) and personally wanting to get ahead, without regard for others’ welfare (domineering dispositions). Survey data from five studies (total N > 1,500) indicated differences between being domineering and endorsing dominant value orientations. This distinction was also evident in different strategies in economic games. Domineering individuals typically gave less to a powerless player (dictator game) but changed behaviors when the other party possessed bargaining power (ultimatum game). Individuals endorsing dominant value orientations did not show such “exploitative opportunism.” In a third-party punishment task, in contrast, individuals with dominant value orientations were more likely to intervene against fair decisions (i.e., upholding inequalities between others). Correcting behaviors of others were not predicted by domineering dispositions. We discuss implications for distinguishing between traits and social values more broadly.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. http://doi:org/10.1037/a0014201
2.
BaumertA.SchmittM.PeruginiM.JohnsonW.BlumG.BorkenauP.WrzusC. (2017a). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
3.
BaumertA.SchmittM.PeruginiM.JohnsonW.BlumG.BorkenauP.WrzusC. (2017b). Working towards integration of personality structure, process, and development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 577–595. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2128
BorkenauP.OstendorfF. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90065-Y
CattellR. B.EberH. W.TatsuokaM. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF): In clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
8.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.HenrichJ. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902
10.
ChristopherA. N.ZabelK. L.JonesJ. R. (2008). Conscientiousness and work ethic ideology. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.4.189
11.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
12.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6
13.
DweckC. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
14.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.GyljeM.ZakrissonI. B. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526
EysenckH. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. Routledge.
17.
FaulF.ErdFelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
GoughH. G.McCloskyH.MeehlP. E. (1951). A personality scale for dominance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 360–366. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0062542
22.
GrinaJ.BerghR.AkramiN.SidaniusJ. (2016). Political orientation and dominance: Are people on the political right more dominant?Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 113–117. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.015
GüthW.SchmittbergerR.SchwarzeB. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
25.
HawleyP. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. http://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470
26.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
27.
HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
28.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
29.
HodsonG.HoggS. M.MacInnisC. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005
30.
KandlerC.ZimmermannJ.McAdamsD. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1952
31.
LockeK. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6
32.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–180). Guilford.
33.
MarshH. W.NagengastB.MorinA. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo Study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
OxobyR. J.McLeishK. N. (2004). Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Economics Letters, 84, 399–405. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.011
Parks-LeducL.FeldmanG.BardiA. (2014). Personality traits and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 3–29. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538548
41.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
42.
ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C.HaslamS. A.RyanM. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1473
43.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS. H.KnafoA. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008
44.
RokeachM.Ball-RokeachS. J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968–1981. American Psychologist, 44, 775–784. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.775
45.
SaroglouV. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 108–125. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352322
46.
SchusterS. (2017). A new solution concept for the ultimatum game leading to the golden ratio. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 5642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05122-5
47.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press.
48.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
49.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365364
50.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: A longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 448–466. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.757544
51.
SidaniusJ.CotterillS.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.KteilyN.CarvachoH. (2016). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). Cambridge University Press.
52.
SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.HoA. K.SibleyC.DuriezB. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313–323. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008
53.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
54.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
55.
WigginsJ. S.TrapnellP.PhillipsN. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8
56.
WitkowerZ.TracyJ. L.ChengJ. T.HenrichJ. (2020). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000181
57.
WoodD.GardnerM. H.HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038423
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
