The current research tested an important way one person’s self-evaluations could shape their intimate partner’s self-evaluations. We predicted that greater self-esteem would predict greater efficacy and esteem support when partners needed support, which would facilitate greater efficacy and self-esteem in partners. We examined these processes within discussions in which one partner could provide support (support provider) to the other (support recipient). Study 1 illustrated that self-esteem was specifically associated with esteem support. Study 2 demonstrated that support providers higher in self-esteem experienced greater efficacy during couples’ support discussions and thus delivered greater esteem support to their partners. Greater esteem support, in turn, was associated with recipients experiencing greater efficacy within couples’ discussions and greater self-esteem across time. Analyses of alternative explanations indicated these processes were unique to self-esteem and esteem support. The results provide initial evidence that self-esteem and efficacy shape, and are shaped by, esteem-related support processes within relationships.
AndersonC.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
3.
BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook, 18, 381–413. doi:10.1080/23808985.1995.11678921
4.
BaumeisterR. F. (Ed.). (2013). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
5.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
6.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
7.
BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Too much of a good thing: Underprovision versus overprovision of partner support. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 181–192. doi:10.1037/a0015402
8.
BrownJ. D. (2014). Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 27–58). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
9.
CavalloJ. V.ZeeK. S.HigginsE. T. (2016). Giving the help that is needed: How regulatory mode impacts social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1111–1128.
10.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
11.
CutronaC. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CutronaC. E.SuhrJ. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174. doi:10.1177/009365092019002002
13.
DavilaJ.BradburyT. N.CohanC. L.TochlukS. (1997). Marital functioning and depressive symptoms: Evidence for a stress generation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 849–861. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.849
14.
FeeneyB. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.631
15.
FeeneyB. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 268–285. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.268
16.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950–968. doi:10.1177/0146167203252807
17.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147. doi:10.1177/1088868314544222
18.
FeeneyB. C.ThrushR. L. (2010). Relationship influences on exploration in adulthood: The characteristics and function of a secure base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 57–76. doi:10.1037/a0016961
19.
FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354. doi:10.1177/0146167200265007
20.
ForestA. L.KilleD. R.WoodJ. V.HolmesJ. G. (2014). Discount and disengage: How chronic negative expressivity undermines partner responsiveness to negative disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1013–1032. doi:10.1037/a0038163
21.
FreemanP.ReesT. (2009). How does perceived support lead to better performance? An examination of potential mechanisms. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 429–441. doi:10.1080=10413200903222913
22.
FreemanP.ReesT. (2010). Perceived social support from team-mates: Direct and stress-buffering effects on self-confidence. European Journal of Sport Science, 10, 59–67. doi:10.1080=17461390903049998
23.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1441–1454. doi:10.1177/0146167213497802
24.
GustavsonK.RøysambE.BorrenI.TorvikF. A.KarevoldE. (2016). Life satisfaction in close relationships: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1293–1311. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9643-7
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HolmstromA. J. (2012). What helps—and what doesn’t—when self-esteem is threatened? Retrospective reports of esteem support. Communication Studies, 63, 77–98. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.586399
27.
HolmstromA. J.BurlesonB. R. (2011). An initial test of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355. doi:10.1177/0093650210376191
28.
HolmstromA. J.RussellJ. C.ClareD. D. (2015). Assessing the role of job-search self-efficacy in the relationship between esteem support and job-search behavior among two populations of job seekers. Communication Studies, 66, 277–300. doi:10.1080/10510974.2014.991043
29.
HowlandM.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Getting in under the radar: A dyadic view of invisible support. Psychological Science, 21, 1878–1885. doi:10.1177/0956797610388817
30.
JayamahaS. D.GirmeY. U.OverallN. C. (2016). When attachment anxiety impedes support provision: The role of feeling unvalued and unappreciated. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 181–191. doi:10.1037/fam0000222
31.
JayamahaS. D.OverallN. C. (2015). Agents’ self-esteem moderates the effectiveness of negative-direct partner regulation strategies. Personal Relationships, 22, 738–761. doi:10.1111/pere.12108
32.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
KourosC. D.CummingsE. M. (2010). Longitudinal associations between husbands’ and wives’ depressive symptoms. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 135–147. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00688.x
34.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
35.
LearyM. R.DownsD. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In KernisM. H. (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–140). New York, NY: Plenum.
36.
MacGeorgeE. L.ClarkR. A.GillihanS. J. (2002). Sex differences in the provision of skilful emotional support: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Communication Reports, 15, 17–28. doi:10.1080/08934210209367749
37.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.ButlerG. L.DaneJ. L.PassalacquaS. A. (2005). Sex differences in goals for supportive interactions. Communication Studies, 56, 23–46. doi:10.1080/0008957042000332232
38.
McLarenR. M.HighA. C. (2015). The effect of under- and over-benefited support gaps on hurt feelings, esteem, and relationships. Communication Research, 1–26. doi:10.1177/0093650215605155
39.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG. M.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.556
40.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1496–1513. doi:10.1177/0146167210383045
41.
PaschL.BradburyT. N. (1998). Social support, conflict and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.219
42.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
43.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
RossettoK. R.LannuttiP. J.SmithR. A. (2014). Investigating self-efficacy and emotional challenge as contributors to willingness to provide emotional support. Southern Communication Journal, 79, 41–58. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2013.854404
45.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
46.
SteffenA. M.McKibbinC.ZeissA. M.Gallagher-ThompsonD.BanduraA. (2002). The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy reliability and validity studies. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 74–86. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.1.P74
47.
UchinoB. N.CacioppoJ. T.Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
