Disgust-sensitive individuals are particularly morally critical. Some theorists take this as evidence that disgust has a uniquely moral form: disgust contributes to moralization even of pathogen-free violations, and disgust’s contribution to moralization is unique from other emotional states. We argue that the relationship between disgust sensitivity (DS) and moral judgment is not special in two respects. First, trait sensitivity to many other affective states, beyond disgust, predicts moral evaluations. Second, DS also predicts nonnormative evaluative judgments. Four studies supported these hypotheses, using multiple measures of DS, and judgments of moral violations (Studies 1 and 4), conventional violations (Study 1), imprudent actions (Study 1), competence (Study 2), and aesthetic evaluations (Study 3). Our findings call into question the usefulness of “moral disgust” as a psychological construct by showing that the relationship between DS and moral condemnation is one instantiation of a more general association between affect and judgment.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.
2.
CameronC. D.LindquistK. A.GrayK. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 371–394.
3.
CaseT. I.OatenM. J.StevensonR. J. (2012). Disgust and moral judgment. In LangdonR.MackenzieC. (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 195–218). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 300–327.
5.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2014). Trait physical disgust is related to moral judgments outside of the purity domain. Emotion, 14, 341–348.
6.
ChengJ. S.OttatiV. C.PriceE. D. (2013). The arousal model of moral condemnation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1012–1018.
7.
CliffordS.IyengarV.CabezaR.Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1178–1198.
8.
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
CurtisV.AungerR.RabieT. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, S131–S133.
10.
CurtisV.BiranA. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes?Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17–31.
11.
DavidB.OlatunjiB. O. (2011). The effect of disgust conditioning and disgust sensitivity on appraisals of moral transgressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1142–1146.
12.
DuncanL. A.SchallerM.ParkJ. H. (2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 541–546.
13.
EskineK. J.KacinikN. A.PrinzJ. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295–299.
14.
FesslerD. M. T.EngS. J.NavarreteC. D. (2005). Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: Evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 344–351.
15.
Giner-SorollaR.ChapmanH. A. (2017). Beyond purity: Moral disgust toward bad character. Psychological Science, 28, 80–91.
16.
GoodwinG.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character information predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168.
17.
HaidtJ.McCauleyC.RozinP. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.
18.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737.
19.
JohnsonD. J.CheungF.DonnellanM. B. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209–215.
20.
JohnsonD. J.WortmanJ.CheungF.HeinM.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B.…NarrR. K. (2016). The effects of disgust on moral judgments: Testing moderators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 640–647.
21.
JonesA.FitnessJ. (2008). Moral hypervigilance: The influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain. Emotion, 8, 613–627.
22.
LandyJ. F.GoodwinG. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 518–536.
23.
LandyJ. F.PiazzaJ.GoodwinG. P. (2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1272–1290.
24.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual(Technical Report A-8). Gainesville: University of Florida.
25.
LernerJ. S.SmallD. A.LoewensteinG. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.
26.
MolhoC.TyburJ. M.GülerE.BallietD.HofmannW. (2017). Disgust and anger relate to different aggressive responses to moral violations. Psychological Science, 28, 609–619.
27.
NabiR. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 695–703.
28.
NucciL. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52, 114–121.
29.
OatenM.StevensonR. J.CaseT. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321.
30.
OlatunjiB. O.SawchuckC. N.LohrJ. M.de JongP. J. (2004). Disgust domains in the prediction of contamination fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 93–104.
31.
OlatunjiB. O.WilliamsN. L.TolinD. F.AbramowitzJ. S.SawchukC. N.LohrJ. M.ElwoodL. S. (2007). The disgust scale: Factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19, 281–297.
32.
ParkJ. H.van LeeuwenF.StephenI. D. (2012). Homeliness is in the disgust sensitivity of the beholder: Relatively unattractive faces appear especially unattractive to individuals higher in pathogen disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 569–577.
33.
PiazzaJ.LandyJ. F.ChakroffA.YoungL.WassermanE. (in press). What disgust does and does not do for moral cognition. In StrohmingerN.KumarV. (Eds.), The moral psychology of disgust.
34.
PiazzaJ.RussellP. S.SousaP. (2013). Moral emotions and the envisaging of mitigating circumstances for wrongdoing. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 707–722.
35.
RoyzmanE.AtanasovP.LandyJ. F.ParksA.GeptyA. (2014). CAD or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion, 14, 892–907.
36.
RoyzmanE. B.SabiniJ. (2001). Something it takes to be an emotion: The interesting case of disgust. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 3, 29–59.
37.
RozinP.FallonA. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.
38.
RozinP.HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R. (2008). Disgust. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2011a). Moral anger is more flexible than moral disgust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 360–364.
40.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2011b). Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality. Emotion, 11, 233–240.
41.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 328–351.
42.
RussellP. S.PiazzaJ. (2015). Consenting to counter-normative sexual acts: Differential effects of consent on anger and disgust as a function of transgressor or consenter. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 634–653.
43.
SchnallS.HaidtJ.CloreG. L.JordanA. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.
44.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
45.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? The informative function of mood. In FiedlerK.ForgasJ. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Toronto, ON: C. J. Hogrefe.
46.
ShermanG. D.HaidtJ.CloreG. L. (2012). The faintest speck of dirt: Disgust enhances the detection of impurity. Psychological Science, 23, 1506–1514.
47.
SmetanaJ. G.JambonM.BallC. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
48.
StorbeckJ.CloreG. L. (2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1824–1843.
49.
TisakM. S.TurielE. (1984). Children’s conceptions of moral and prudential rules. Child Development, 55, 1030–1039.
50.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122.
52.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.Kurzban&DeScioliP. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65–84.
53.
UgazioG.LammC.SingerT. (2012). The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. Emotion, 12, 579–590.
54.
WheatleyT.HaidtJ. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784.
55.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
