Disgust seems to play an important role in moral judgment. However, it is unclear whether the role of disgust in moral judgment is limited to certain kinds of moral domains (versus many) and/or certain types of disgust (versus many). To clarify these questions, we conducted a multilevel meta-analysis (k = 512; N = 72,443) on relations between trait disgust sensitivity and moral judgment (disgust-immorality association). Main analyses revealed a significant overall mean disgust-immorality association (r = .23). Additionally, moderator analyses revealed significant specificity in disgust type and moral domain (grounded in Moral Foundations Theory): effects were stronger for (a) sexual disgust compared to pathogen disgust, (b) sanctity moral judgments compared to other domains of moral judgments, and (c) sexual-sanctity associations compared to other disgust type-moral domain pairings.
AarøeL.PetersenM. B.ArceneauxK. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. The American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000770
ArmstrongT.WilbanksD.LeongD.HsuK. (2021). Beyond vernacular: measurement solutions to the lexical fallacy in disgust research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 82(2021), 102408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102408
4.
BiałekM.MudaR.FugelsangJ.FriedmanO. (2021). Disgust and moral judgment: Distinguishing between elicitors and feelings matters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620919569
5.
BillingsleyJ.LiebermanD.TyburJ. M. (2018). Sexual disgust trumps pathogen disgust in predicting voter behavior during the 2016 US presidential election. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918764170
6.
BocianK.BarylaW.WojciszkeB. (2021). Moderators of the liking bias in judgments of moral character. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 48(4), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211013272
7.
CameronC. D.LindquistK. A.GrayK. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314566683
8.
CannonP. R.SchnallS.WhiteM. (2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610390525
9.
CavanaghK.DaveyG. C. L. (2000). UCS Expectancy biases in spider phobics: Underestimation of aversive consequences following fear-irrelevant stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(7), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00077-7
10.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030964
11.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2014). Trait physical disgust is related to moral judgments outside of the purity domain. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 14(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035120
12.
ChapmanH. A.KimD. A.SusskindJ. M.AndersonA. K. (2009). In bad taste: evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5918), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165565
13.
CheungM. W. L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
14.
ChingT. H. W.WilliamsM. T.SievJ.OlatunjiB. O. (2018). Responsibility/threat overestimation moderates the relationship between contamination-based disgust and obsessive–compulsive concerns about sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1109–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1165-z
15.
CurryO. S.ChestersM. J.Van LissaC. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
16.
CurtisV.De BarraM.AungerR. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behavior. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0117
CusimanoC.RoyzmanE. B.LeemanR. F.MetasS. (2018). Measurement is the core disgust problem: response to Inbar and Scott (2018). Judgment and Decision Making, 13(6), 639–651.
DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C.TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.003
21.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
22.
EskineK. J.KacinikN. A.PrinzJ. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497
23.
FeinbergM.AntonenkoO.WillerR.HorbergE. J.JohnO. P. (2014). Gut check: Reappraisal of disgust helps explain liberal–conservative differences on issues of purity. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 14(3), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033727
24.
FincherC. L.ThornhillR. (2008). Assortative sociality, limited dispersal, infectious disease and the genesis of the global pattern of religion diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2587–2594. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0688
25.
GarveyK. J.FordT. G. (2014). Rationality, political orientation, and the individualizing and binding moral foundations. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 5(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2014.29
26.
GhelfiE.ChristophersonC. D.UrryH. L.LenneR. L.LegateN.FischerM. A.WagemansF. M. A.WigginsB.BarrettT.BornsteinM.de HaanB.GubermanJ.IssaN.KimJ.NaE.O'BrienJ.PaulkA.PeckT.SashiharaM.,,…SullivanD. (2019). Reexamining the effect of gustatory disgust on moral judgment: A multi-lab direct replication of Eskine, Kacinik, and Prinz (2011). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919881152
27.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
28.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS. P.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
29.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
GreeneJ. D.NystromL. E.EngellA. D.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
32.
GutierrezR.Giner-SorollaR.VasiljevicM. (2012). Just an anger synonym? Moral context influences predictors of disgust word use. Cognition & Emotion, 26(1), 53– 64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.567773
33.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
HaidtJ.McCauleyC.RozinP. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7
36.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
37.
HodsonG.CostelloK. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x
38.
HorbergE. J.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: an appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402384
39.
HorbergE. J.OveisC.KeltnerD.CohenA. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 963–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017423
40.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
IzardC. E.LiberoD. Z.PutnamP.HaynesO. M. (1993). Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.847
43.
JohnsonD. J.WortmanJ.CheungF.HeinM.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B.,,…NarrR. K. (2016). The effects of disgust on moral judgments: testing moderators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616654211
44.
JonesB. C.FeinbergD. R.WatkinsC. D.FincherC. L.LittleA. C.DeBruineL. M. (2013). Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies. Behavioral Ecology, 24(2), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars173
45.
JonesA.FitnessJ. (2008). Moral hypervigilance: The influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 8(5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013435
46.
JylkkäJ.HärkönenJ.HyönäJ. (2021). Incidental disgust does not cause moral condemnation of neutral actions. Cognition and Emotion, 35(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1810639
47.
KarinenA. K.ChapmanH. A. (2019). Cognitive and personality correlates of trait disgust and their relationship to condemnation of nonpurity moral transgressions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19(5), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000489
48.
KleinknechtR. A.TolinD. F.LohrJ.KleinknechtE. E. (1996, November). Structural equation modelling of blood Injury fear and fainting. Poster presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York City, New York.
49.
KolevaS.SeltermanD.IyerR.DittoP.GrahamJ. (2013). The moral compass of insecurity: anxious and avoidant attachment predict moral judgment. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613490965
KollarethD.RussellJ. A. (2019). Disgust and the sacred: do people react to violations of the sacred with the same emotion they react to something putrid?Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000412
52.
KubinskiJ. S.NavarreteC. D.JonasonP. K. (2018). Gender differences in two motivational pathways to political conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.001
53.
KupferT. R. (2018). Why are injuries disgusting? Comparing pathogen avoidance and empathy accounts. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(7), 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000395
54.
KurzbanR.DukesA.WeedenJ. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0608
55.
LandyJ. F.GoodwinG. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615583128
56.
LandyJ. F.PiazzaJ. (2019). Reevaluating moral disgust: Sensitivity to many affective states predicts extremity in many evaluative judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617736110
57.
LeeS. W. S.EllsworthP. C. (2013). Maggots and morals: physical disgust is to fear as moral disgust is to anger. In FontaineJ. J. R.SchererK. R.SorianoC. (Eds.), Series in affective science. Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 271–280). Oxford University Press.
58.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
61.
LovettB. J.JordanA. H.WiltermuthS. S. (2012). Individual differences in the moralization of everyday life. Ethics & Behavior, 22(4), 248–257.
62.
LydonJ. E.JamiesonD. W.ZannaM. P. (1988). Interpersonal similarity and the social and intellectual dimensions of first impressions. Social Cognition, 6(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1988.6.4.269
63.
McDonaldM.PoratR.YarkoneyA.Reifen TagarM.KimelS.SaguyT.HalperinE. (2017). Intergroup emotional similarity reduces dehumanization and promotes conciliatory attitudes in prolonged conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215595107
64.
MentserS.NussinsonR. (2020). We’re not of the same feather: disgust sensitivity and reduced perceived similarity to unknown others. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110039
65.
MollJ.ZahnR.de Oliveira-SouzaR.KruegerF.GrafmanJ. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1768
66.
MurrayD. R.SchallerM. (2016). The behavioral immune system: implications for social cognition, social interaction, and social influence. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 75–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.002
67.
MurrayD. R.TrudeauR.SchallerM. (2011). On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210394451
68.
NabiR. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: implications for emotion research. Cognition & Emotion, 16(5), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000437
OatenM.StevensonR. J.CaseT. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014823
71.
OlatunjiB. O. (2008). Disgust, scrupulosity, and conservative attitudes about sex: evidence for a mediational model of homophobia. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.001
72.
OlatunjiB. O.EbesutaniC.HaidtJ.SawchukC. N. (2014). Specificity of disgust domains in the prediction of contamination anxiety and avoidance: A multimodal examination. Behavior Therapy, 45(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.02.006
73.
OlatunjiB. O.HaidtJ.McKayD.DavidB. (2008). Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009
74.
OlatunjiB. O.MoretzM. W.McKayD.BjorklundF.de JongP. J.HaidtJ.,,…SchienleA. (2009). Confirming the three-factor structure of the disgust scale—revised in eight countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108328918
OlatunjiB. O.WilliamsN. L.TolinD. F.AbramowitzJ. S.SawchukC. N.LohrJ. M.ElwoodL. S. (2007). The disgust scale: Item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281
77.
ParkinsonC.Sinnott-ArmstrongW.KoralusP. E.MendeloviciA.McGeerV.WheatleyT. (2011). Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3162–3180. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00017
PiazzaJ. R.LandyJ.ChakroffA.YoungL.WassermanE. (2018). What disgust does and does not do for moral cognition. In StrohmingerN.KumarV. (eds), The moral psychology of disgust (pp. 53–81). Rowan & Littlefield.
80.
PinsofD.HaseltonM. G. (2016). The political divide over same-sex marriage: mating strategies in conflict?Psychological Science, 27(4), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615621719
PoliA.MelliG.RadomskyA. S. (2019). Different disgust domains specifically relate to mental and contact contamination fear in obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from a path analytic model in an Italian clinical sample. Behavior Therapy, 50(2), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.07.006
83.
PrinzJ. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press.
84.
QuintelierK. J. P.IshiiK.WeedenJ.KurzbanR.BraeckmanJ. (2013). Individual differences in reproductive strategy are related to views about recreational drug use in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Japan. Human Nature, 24(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9165-0
85.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.JrStokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
86.
RoyzmanE.AtanasovP.LandyJ. F.ParksA.GeptyA. (2014). CAD Or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 14(5), 892. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036829
RozinP.HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R. (2008). Disgust. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). Guilford Press.
89.
RozinP.LoweryL.EbertR. (1994). Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.870
90.
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
91.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029319
92.
SanyalM.McAuliffeW. H. B.CurryO. S. (2021). Gross values: investigating the role of disgust in bioethics. Current Psychology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01609-7.
93.
SchallerM. (2014). When and how disgust is and is not implicated in the behavioral immune system. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 251. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000019
94.
SchallerM.ParkJ. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402596
SchnallS.HaidtJ.CloreG. L.JordanA. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771
97.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). Guilford.
98.
TyburJ. M.BryanA. D.LiebermanD.Caldwell HooperA. E.MerrimanL. A.. (2011). Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 343–348.
99.
TyburJ. M.ÇınarÇ.KarinenA. K.PeroneP. (2018). Why do people vary in disgust?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1751), 21070204. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0204
100.
TyburJ. M.InbarY.GülerE.MolhoC. (2015). Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies?Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.006
101.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.FanL.KupferT. R.de VriesR. E. (2020). Behavioral immune trade-offs: interpersonal value relaxes social pathogen avoidance. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620960011
102.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015474
103.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.KurzbanR.DeScioliP. (2013). Disgust: evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030778
104.
TyburJ. M.MerrimanL. A.HooperA. E. C.McDonaldM. M.NavarreteC. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related?Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800406
105.
UgazioG.LammC.SingerT. (2012). The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12(3), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024611
106.
van DijkeM.van HouwelingenG.De CremerD.De SchutterL. (2018). So gross and yet so far away: Psychological distance moderates the effect of disgust on moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722198
107.
van OverveldW. J. M.De JongP. J.PetersM. L.CavanaghK.DaveyG. C. L. (2006). Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(7), 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.021
108.
van OverveldM.de JongP. J.PetersM. L.SchoutenE. (2011). The disgust scale-R: A valid and reliable index to investigate separate disgust domains?Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.023
109.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
110.
WagemansF.BrandtM. J.ZeelenbergM. (2018). Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000359
111.
WeedenJ.KurzbanR. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006
WisneskiD. C.SkitkaL. (2017). Moralization through moral shock: exploring emotional antecedents to moral conviction. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 43(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676479
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
