The present research investigated an often presumed but rarely assessed construct named the physiognomic belief—a generic belief that various traits can be inferred from faces. Studies in Japan and the United States have demonstrated that this belief can be measured reliably and invariantly across cultures and that those having stronger beliefs make more extreme trait inferences from faces. Of note, in both countries, the physiognomic belief is positively associated with a biologically deterministic view of personality traits and a belief in a just world. These findings suggest two types of naive justifications for the physiognomic belief: faces and traits should be related because they are both manifestations of biological essences and because the world is an orderly place wherein people get faces they deserve. This highlights an understudied role of folk concepts involving faces and traits in the popularity of face-based trait inference among laypeople.
AmesD. R.KammrathL. K.SuppesA.BolgerN. (2010). Not so fast: The (not-quite-complete) dissociation between accuracy and confidence in thin-slice impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 264–277. doi:10.1177/0146167209354519
2.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
3.
BiesanzJ. C.HumanL. J.PaquinA.-C.ChanM.ParisottoK. L.SarracinoJ.GillisR. L. (2011). Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? Evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 452–459. doi:10.1177/1948550610397211
4.
BirdB. M.JofréV. S. C.GenioleS. N.WelkerK. M.ZilioliS.MaestripieriD.…CarréJ. M. (2016). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men’s testosterone concentrations?Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 392–398. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.004
5.
BonnefonJ. F.HopfensitzA.De NeysW. (2015). Face-ism and kernels of truth in facial inferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 421–422. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.002
6.
CallanM. J.PowellN. G.EllardJ. H. (2007). The consequences of victim physical attractiveness on reactions to injustice: The role of observers’ belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 20, 433–456. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0053-9
7.
ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
8.
CogsdillE. J.TodorovA. T.SpelkeE. S.BanajiM. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25, 1132–1139. doi:10.1177/0956797614523297
9.
DionK. L.DionK. K. (1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 775–780. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.775
10.
DweckC. S.ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
11.
EllardJ. H.HarveyA.CallanM. J. (2016). The justice motive: History, theory, and research. In SabbaghC.SchmittM. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
FujiiT.UebuchiH. (2010). Assessment of participants’ theories of intelligence: Reliability and validity of the Implicit Association Test. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 263–274. doi:10.5926/jjep.58.263
13.
GregorichS. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S78–S94. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
14.
HaferC. L.SuttonR. (2016). Belief in a just world. In SabbaghC.SchmittM. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Springer.
15.
HaselhuhnM. P.OrmistonM. E.WongE. M. (2015). Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10, e0122637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122637
16.
HaslamN.BastianB.BissettM. (2004). Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1661–1673. doi:10.1177/0146167204271182
17.
HassinR.TropeY. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–852. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.837
18.
HirschfeldG.von BrachelR. (2014). Improving multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R: A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19, Article 7. Retrieved fromhttp://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=7
19.
HugenbergK.WilsonJ. P. (2013). Faces are central to social cognition. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 167–193). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
21.
KlapperA.DotschR.van RooijI.WigboldusD. H. J. (2016). Do we spontaneously form stable trustworthiness impressions from facial appearance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 655–664. doi:10.1037/pspa0000062
22.
LangF. R.JohnD.LüdtkeO.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 548–567. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z
23.
LebowitzM. S.AhnW. K.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2013). Fixable or fate? Perceptions of the biology of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 518–527. doi:10.1037/a0031730
24.
LefevreC. E.LewisG. J.PerrettD. I.PenkeL. (2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005
25.
LernerM. J.MillerD. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
26.
LevyS. R.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
27.
LipkusI. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
28.
LivingstonR. W. (2001). What you see is what you get: Systematic variability in perceptual-based social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1086–1096. doi:10.1177/0146167201279002
29.
MascretN.RousselP.CuryF. (2015). Using implicit measures to highlight science teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 269–280. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0249-6
30.
MattarozziK.TodorovA.MarzocchiM.VicariA.RussoP. M. (2015). Effects of gender and personality on first impression. PLoS One, 10, Articlee0135529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135529
31.
MedinD. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469–1481. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469
32.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/Bf03200807
33.
OlivolaC. Y.EubanksD. L.LovelaceJ. B. (2014). The many (distinctive) faces of leadership: Inferring leadership domain from facial appearance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 817–834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.002
34.
OlivolaC. Y.FunkF.TodorovA. (2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 566–570. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.007
35.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010a). Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002
36.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010b). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
37.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 11087–11092. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
38.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL.GustawC. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology Crime & Law, 16, 477–491. doi:10.1080/10683160902926141
39.
RajuN. S.LaffitteL. J.ByrneB. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 517–529. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517
40.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997.x
41.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.JrOzonoH.NakashimaS.YoshikawaS.WatabeM. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0017673
42.
RuleN. O.KrendlA. C.IvcevicZ.AmbadyN. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426. doi:10.1037/A0031050
43.
SecordP. F. (1958). Facial features and inference processes in interpersonal perception. In TagiuriR.PetrulloL. (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 300–315). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
ShiraiM. (2011). For conceptual understanding in “personal severity to crime” and “just world beliefs” (2). Bulletin of the Graduate School, Toyo University, 47, 151–166. Retrieved fromhttps://www.toyo.ac.jp/uploaded/attachment/8065.pdf
45.
SutherlandC. A. M.OldmeadowJ. A.YoungA. W. (2016). Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions. Cognition, 157, 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006
46.
SuzukiA. (2016). Persistent reliance on facial appearance among older adults when judging someone’s trustworthiness. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw034
47.
TodorovA. (2017). Face value: The irresistible influence of first impressions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TodorovA.DotschR.PorterJ. M.OosterhofN. N.FalvelloV. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13, 724–738. doi:10.1037/a0032335
49.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
50.
TodorovA.OosterhofN. N. (2011). Modeling social perception of faces [Social Sciences]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28, 117–122. doi:10.1109/MSP.2010.940006
51.
TsukamotoS.EnrightJ.KarasawaM. (2013). Psychological essentialism and nationalism as determinants of interethnic bias. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 515–519. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.795926
52.
WalkerM.JiangF.VetterT.SczesnyS. (2011). Universals and cultural differences in forming personality trait judgments from faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 609–617. doi:10.1177/1948550611402519
53.
WilliamsM. J.EberhardtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–1047. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033
ZebrowitzL. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.
ZebrowitzL. A.VoinescuL.CollinsM. A. (1996). “Wide-eyed” and “crooked-faced”: Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1258–1269. doi:10.1177/01461672962212006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
