People prefer to perceive the world as just; however, the everyday experience of undeserved events challenges this perception.The authors suggest that one way people rationalize these daily experiences of unfairness is by means of a compensatory bias. People make undeserved events more palatable by endorsing the notion that outcomes naturally balance out in the end—good, yet undeserved, outcomes will balance out bad outcomes, and bad undeserved outcomes will balance out good outcomes.The authors propose that compensatory biases manifest in people’s interpretive processes (Study 1) and memory (Study 2). Furthermore, they provide evidence that people have a natural tendency to anticipate compensatory outcomes in the future, which, ironically, might lead them to perceive a current situation as relatively more fair (Study 3).These studies highlight an understudied means of justifying unfairness and elucidate the justice motive’s power to affect people’s construal of their social world.
Callan, M.J., Ellard, J.H., & Nicol, J.E. ( 2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646-1658.
3.
Chiu, C., Morris, M.W., Hong, Y., & Menon, T. ( 2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 247-247.
4.
Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenberg, A., Kruglanski, A.W., & Schaper, C. ( 1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 32, 254-254.
5.
Ellard, J.H., & Bates, D.D. ( 1990). Evidence for the role of the justice motive in status generalization. Social Justice Research, 4, 115-134.
6.
Feather, N.T. ( 1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86-86.
7.
Festinger, L. ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Hafer, C.L. ( 2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165-173.
9.
Hafer, C.L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128-128.
10.
Hafer, C.L., & Gosse, L. (in press). Preserving the belief in a just world: When and for whom are different strategies preferred? In D. R. Bobocel , A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). New York: Psychology Press.
11.
Heider, F. ( 1958). Ought and value. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. ( 1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology . Special Issue: Stereotypes: Structure, Function and Process , 33, 1-27.
13.
Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. ( 2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-881.
14.
Jost, J.T., & Kay, A.C. ( 2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-498.
15.
Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A., & McClelland, G.H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115-115.
16.
Kay, A.C., Jimenez, M.C., & Jost, J.T. ( 2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 28, 1300-1300.
17.
Kay, A.C., & Jost, J.T. ( 2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-823.
18.
Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T., Mandisodza, A.N., Sherman, S.J., Petrocelli, J.V., & Johnson, A.L. ( 2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), 2005 Society of Experimental Social Psychology Conference, San Diego, CA (pp. 305-358). San Diego: Elsevier.
19.
Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T., & Young, S. ( 2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-240.
20.
Kunda, Z. ( 1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
21.
Lerner, M.J. ( 1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
22.
Lerner, M.J. ( 1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
23.
Lipkus, I. ( 1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences , 12, 1171-1171.
24.
Maes, J. ( 1998). Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 9-40). New York: Plenum.
25.
McDonald, H.E., & Hirt, E.R. ( 1997). When expectancy meets desire: Motivational effects in reconstructive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72, 5-5.
26.
Plaks, J.E., Grant, H., & Dweck, C.S. ( 2005). Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 245-245.
27.
Rubin, Z., & Peplau, A. ( 1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another’s lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 73-73.
28.
Sanitioso, R., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G.T. ( 1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 229-229.
29.
Schmitt, M., Kilders, M., Mösle, A., & Müller, L. (1991). Gerechte-welt-glaube, gewinn und verlust: Rechtfertigung oder ausgleichende gerechtigkeit? [Belief in a just world, gain and loss: Justification or compensatory justice?]Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 22, 37-37.
30.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. ( 1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-151.
