Psychological research has neglected people whose accent does not match their appearance. Most research on person perception has focused on appearance, overlooking accents that are equally important social cues. If accents were studied, it was often done in isolation (i.e., detached from appearance). We examine how varying accent and appearance information about people affects evaluations. We show that evaluations of expectancy-violating people shift in the direction of the added information. When a job candidate looked foreign, but later spoke with a native accent, his evaluations rose and he was evaluated best of all candidates (Experiment 1a). However, the sequence in which information was presented mattered: When heard first and then seen, his evaluations dropped (Experiment 1b). Findings demonstrate the importance of studying the combination and sequence of different types of information in impression formation. They also allow predicting reactions to ethnically mixed people, who are increasingly present in modern societies.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
2.
AsbrockF. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41, 76–81.
3.
BurgoonJ. K. (2009). Expectancy violations theory. In GriffinE. (Ed.), A first look at communication theory (pp. 84–97). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BurgoonJ. K.LePoireB. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67–96.
5.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CongerA. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35–46.
7.
de VriesG.TerwelB. W.EllemersN. (2014). Spare the details, share the relevance: The dilution effect in communications about carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 116–123. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.003
8.
EckesT. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99–114. doi:10.1023/A:1021020920715
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
10.
Federal Ministry of the Interior. (2007). Deutsche und Ausländer mit Migrationshintergrund[Germans and foreigners with an immigrant background]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.en.bmi.bund.de/
11.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
12.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of personal construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. doi:10.1037/a0022327
13.
FuertesJ. N.GottdienerW. H.MartinH.GilbertT. C.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 120–133. doi:10.1002/ejsp.862
14.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 199–243). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69–99. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69
HansenK.DovidioJ. F. (2016). Social dominance orientation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 544–551. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000101.
18.
HansenK.RakićT.SteffensM. C. (2017). Competent and warm? How mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. Experimental Psychology. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000348
19.
HansenK.SteffensM. C.RakićT.WieseH. (2017). When appearance does not match accent: Neural correlates of ethnicity-related expectancy violations. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw148
20.
HarperM.SchoemanW. J. (2003). Influences of gender as a basic-level category in person perception on the gender belief system. Sex Roles, 49, 517–526.
21.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
JacksonL. A.SullivanL. A.HodgeC. N. (1993). Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69–84. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.69
23.
JussimL.ColemanL. M.LerchL. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
24.
KinzlerK. D.ShuttsK.DejesusJ.SpelkeE. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27, 623–634. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623
MacKinnonD.FairchildA. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16–20.
27.
McKirnanD. J.SmithC. E.HamayanE. V. (1983). A sociolinguistic approach to the belief-similarity model of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 434–447. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90021-5
28.
NesselroadeJ. R.StiglerS. M.BaltesP. B. (1980). Regression toward the mean and the study of change. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 622–637.
29.
NisbettR. E.ZukierH.LemleyR. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248–277.
30.
O’ConnellA. N.RotterN. G. (1979). The influence of stimulus age and sex on person perception. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 220–228.
31.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014a). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.005
32.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014b). Evidence that accent is a dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of perceptual salience, familiarity, or ease-of-processing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.006
33.
RakićT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 16–29. doi:10.1037/a0021522
34.
RödinM.ÖzcanG. (2011). Is it how you look or speak that matters? An experimental study exploring the mechanisms of ethnic discrimination(Research Paper No. 2011:12). Retrieved fromhttp://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc: hhs: sunrpe:2011_0012
35.
RoeseN. J.ShermanJ. W. (2007). Expectancy. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
37.
ShepardC. A.GilesH.Le PoireB. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In RobinsonW. P.GilesH. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 33–56). Sussex, England: John Wiley.
38.
SouzaL. E. C.PereiraC. R.CaminoL.LimaT. J. S.TorresA. R. R. (2016). The legitimizing role of accent on discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 609–620.
39.
WojciszkeB.AbeleA. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147.
40.
ZuckermanM.MiyakeK.HodginsH. S. (1991). Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 545–554. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.545
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
