Explaining Extremity in Evaluation of Group Members

Abstract

A meta-analysis that included more than 1,100 effect sizes tested the predictions of three theoretical perspectives that explain evaluative extremity in social judgment: complexity-extremity theory, subjective group dynamics model, and expectancy-violation theory. The work seeks to understand the ways in which group-based information interacts with person-based information to influence extremity in evaluations. Together, these three theories point to the valence of person-based information, group membership of the evaluated targets relative to the evaluator, status of the evaluators’ ingroup, norm consistency of the person-based information, and incongruency of person-based information with stereotype-based expectations as moderators. Considerable support, but some limiting conditions, were found for each theoretical perspective. Implications of the results are discussed.

Keywords

Complexity extremity subjective group dynamics expectancy violation impression formation stereotyping evaluative extremity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Abbey

Melby

(1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283-298.

*Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

(1987). Language attitudes, frames of reference, and social identity: A Scottish dimension. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 201-213.

*Abrams

Marques

Brown

Dougill

(2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163-182. doi:10.1177/1368430202005002922

Abrams

Marques

J. M.

Brown

N. J.

Henson

(2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.

*Abrams

Randsley de Moura

Marques

J. M.

Hutchison

(2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662-678.

*Abrams

Rutland

Cameron

(2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840-1856.

*Abrams

Rutland

Cameron

Marques

J. M.

(2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 155-176.

*Abramson

P. R.

Goldberg

P. A.

Greenberg

J. H.

Abramson

L. M.

(1977). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114-124.

*Arkkelin

O’Connor

(1992). The “good” professional: Effects of trait-profile gender type, androgyny, and likableness on impressions of incumbents of sex-typed occupations. Sex Roles, 27, 517-532.

10.

*Atkinson

D. R.

Maruyama

Matsui

(1978). Effect of counselor race and counseling approach on Asian Americans’ perceptions of counselor credibility and utility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 76-83.

11.

*Banikiotes

P. G.

Merluzzi

T. V.

(1981). Impact of counselor gender and counselor sex role orientation on perceived counselor characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 342-348.

12.

*Barnett

M. A.

McMinimy

Flouer

Masbad

(1987). Adolescents’ evaluations of peers’ motives for helping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 579-586.

13.

*Bar Tal

Raviv

Arad

(1989). Effects of information of student-teachers’ stereotypic perception of pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 143-154.

14.

*Bartol

K. M.

Butterfield

(1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446-454.

15.

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Finkenauer

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.

16.

*Bean

L. D.

(1977). Interpersonal perception among college students as a function of sex and level of assertiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 1292.

17.

*Beauvais

Spence

J. T.

(1987). Gender, prejudice, and categorization. Sex Roles, 16, 89-100.

18.

*Bègue

(2001). Social judgment of abortion: A black-sheep effect in a catholic sheepfold. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 640-649.

19.

*Benedict

M. E.

Levine

E. L.

(1988). Delay and distortion: Tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 507-514.

20.

*Bernstein

B. L.

Figiolo

S. W.

(1983). Gender and credibility introduction effects on perceived counselor characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 506-513.

21.

*Bettencourt

B. A.

Dill

K. E.

Greathouse

S. A.

Charlton

Mulholland

(1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1323

22.

Bettencourt

B. A.

Miller

(1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.422

23.

*Biernat

Manis

(1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5

24.

Biernat

Manis

Nelson

T. E.

(1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485

25.

*Biernat

Vescio

T. K.

(2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66-77.

26.

*Biernat

Vescio

T. K.

Billings

L. S.

(1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 523-542. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199906)29:4<523::aid-ejsp944>3.0.co;2-j

27.

*Blanchard

F. A.

Weigel

R. H.

Cook

S. W.

(1975). The effect of relative competence of group members upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 519-530.

28.

*Bodenhausen

G. V.

(1987). Effects of social stereotypes on evidence processing: The cognitive basis of discrimination in juridic decision making (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

29.

Borenstein

Hedges

Rothstein

(2007). Introduction to meta-analysis. Available from www.meta-analysis.com

30.

*Braithwaite

V. A.

(1986). Old age stereotypes: Reconciling contradictions. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 353-360.

31.

*Breakwell

G. M.

Vignoles

V. L.

Robertson

(2003). Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: The case of gender and science education. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 437-455.

32.

Brewer

M. B.

(1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In Srull

T. K.

Wyer

R. S.

(Eds), A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

33.

*Brewer

M. B.

H. K.

Lee

J. Y.

Miller

(1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156-165.

34.

*Bridges

J. S.

del Ciampo

(1981). Children’s perception of the competence of boys and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 503-506.

35.

*Brischetto

C. S.

Merluzzi

T. V.

(1981). Client perceptions in an initial interview as a function of therapist sex and expertness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 82-87.

36.

*Brown

N. J.

Abrams

(2003). Despicability in the workplace: Effects of behavioral deviance and unlikeability on the evaluation of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2413-2426.

37.

*Buckly

(1979). The acceptability of the stereotypic and non-stereotypic male and female. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1949-1950.

38.

*Byrne

London

Reeves

(1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259-271.

39.

*Byrne

McGraw

(1964). Interpersonal attraction toward Negroes. Human Relations, 17, 201-213.

40.

*Carranza

M. A.

Ryan

E. B.

(1975). Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American adolescents towards speakers of English and Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 83-104.

41.

*Carter

J. A.

(1978). Impressions of counselors as a function of counselor physical attractiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 28-34.

42.

*Carver

C. S.

Glass

D. C.

Snyder

M. L.

Katz

(1977). Favorable evaluations of stigmatized others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 232-235.

43.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

44.

*Coleman

L. M.

Jussim

Kelley

S. H.

(1995). A study of stereotyping: Testing three models with a sample of Blacks. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 332-356. doi:10.1177/00957984950214004

45.

Cooper

H. M.

(1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

46.

Cooper

H. M.

(1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

47.

*Cooper

H. M.

Baron

R. M.

Lowe

C. A.

(1975). The importance of race and social class information in the formation of expectancies about academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 312-319.

48.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

(2003). A justification -suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.

49.

Dean

M. A.

Roth

P. L.

Bobko

(2008). Ethnic and gender subgroup differences in assessment center ratings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 685-691. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.6852008-05281-015

50.

*Deaux

(1972). To err is humanizing. But sex makes a differences. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 3, 20-28.

51.

*Deaux

Taynor

(1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32, 261-262.

52.

*Decker

W. H.

(1986). Occupation and impressions: Stereotypes of males and females in three professions. Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 69-75.

53.

*De Cremer

Vanbeselaere

(1999). I am deviant, because . . . : The impact of situational factors upon the black sheep effect. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 71-79.

54.

*DeJong

(1980). The stigma of obesity: The consequences of naïve assumptions concerning the causes of physical deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 75-87.

55.

*De La Cruz-Barrera

(1984). Gender, race, expectancy, and interpersonal behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 701.

56.

*del Boca

F. K.

Ashmore

R. D.

(1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. II. A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 519-535.

57.

Dickerson

S. S.

Kemeny

M. E.

(2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355-391. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355

58.

*Dienstbier

R. A.

(1970). Positive and negative prejudice: Interactions of prejudice with race and social desirability. Journal of Personality, 38, 198-215.

59.

*Dietz

S. M.

Purkey

W. W.

(1969). Teacher expectation of performance based on race of student. Psychological Reports, 24, 694.

60.

*Doherty

K. T.

(1998). A mind of her own: Effects of need for closure and gender on reactions to nonconformity. Sex Roles, 38, 801-819.

61.

Doherty

R. W.

(1998). Emotional contagion and social judgment. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 187-209. doi:10.1023/a:1022368805803

62.

Eagly

A. H.

Ashmore

R. D.

Makhijani

M. G.

Longo

L. C.

(1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109

63.

Eagly

A. H.

Makhijani

M. G.

Klonsky

B. G.

(1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3

64.

*Eidelman

Biernat

(2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 602-609.

65.

*Eidelman

Silvia

P. J.

Biernat

(2006). Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1153-1164. doi:10.1177/0146167206288720

66.

*Erber

J. T.

Caiola

M. A.

Pupo

F. A.

(1994). Age and forgetfulness: Managing perceivers’ impressions of targets’ capability. Psychology and Aging, 9, 554-561.

67.

*Erber

J. T.

Long

(2006). Perceptions of forgetful and slow employees: Does age matter? The Journals of Gerontology, 61B, 333-339.

68.

*Erber

J. T.

Szuchman

L. T.

Etheart

M. E.

(1993). Age and forgetfulness: Young perceivers’ impressions of young and older neighbors. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 37, 91-103.

69.

*Etaugh

Folger

(1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215-223.

70.

*Etaugh

Kasley

H. C.

(1981). Evaluating competence: Effects of sex, marital status, and parental status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 62, 196-203.

71.

Festinger

Thibaut

(1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.

72.

Finkelstein

L. M.

Burke

M. J.

Raju

M. S.

(1995). Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 652-663. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652

73.

*Fishbein

(1979). An investigation of sex-role stereotypes and assertive behavior in men and women. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 912.

74.

Fiske

S. T.

(1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621

75.

Fiske

S. T.

Neuberg

S. L.

(1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.

76.

Ford

J. K.

Kraiger

Schechtman

S. L.

(1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330-337. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.330

77.

Foschi

(1998). Double standards: Types, conditions, and consequences. Advances in Group Processes, 15, 59-80.

78.

Foschi

(2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21-42.

79.

*Furlong

M. J.

Atkinson

D. R.

Casas

J. M.

(1979). Effect of counselor ethnicity and attitudinal similarity on Chicano students’ perceptions of the counselor credibility and attractiveness. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1, 41-53.

80.

*Gallois

Callan

Johnstone

(1984). Personality judgements of Australian Aborigine and White speakers: Ethnicity, sex, and context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 39-57.

81.

*Garcia

D. M.

Reser

A. H.

Amo

R. B.

Redersdorff

Branscombe

N. R.

(2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769-780.

82.

*Gawronski

Geschke

Banse

(2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of person-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 573-589.

83.

*Gerdes

E. P.

Kelman

J. H.

(1981). Sex discrimination: Effects of sex-role incongruence, evaluator sex, and stereotypes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 219-226.

84.

*Gordon

R. A.

Rozelle

R. M.

Baxter

J. C.

(1989). The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on perceptions of female job applicants. Journal of Psychology, 123, 59-68.

85.

*Gurwitz

S. B.

Marcus

(1978). Effects of anticipated interaction, sex, and homosexual stereotypes on first impressions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 47-56.

86.

*Guttmann

Lazar

Moran

(2008). Teachers’ and school children’s stereotypic perception of the child of divorce: 20 years later. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 42, 131-141.

87.

*Hagen

R. L.

Kahn

(1975). Discrimination against competent women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 362-376.

88.

*Hammen

C. L.

Peters

S. D.

(1977). Differential responses to male and female depressive reactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 994-1001.

89.

Harber

K. D.

(1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622-628.

90.

*Harber

K. D.

(2004). The positive feedback bias as a response to out-group unfriendliness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2272-2297.

91.

*Hart

A. J.

Morry

M. M.

(1997). Trait inferences based on racial and behavioral cues. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 33-48. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1901_3

92.

Hedges

(1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128. doi:10.2307/1164588

93.

Hedges

Olkin

(1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

94.

*Heilman

M. E.

Amato

M. A.

Kaplow

Stathatos

(1993). When similarity is a liability: The effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like and different sex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.

95.

*Heilman

M. E.

Block

C. J.

Lucas

J. A.

(1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536-544.

96.

*Heilman

M. E.

Block

C. J.

Stathatos

(1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603-625.

97.

*Heilman

M. E.

Chen

J. J.

(2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431-441.

98.

*Heilman

M. E.

Haynes

M. C.

(2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in mixed-sex teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905-916.

99.

*Heilman

M. E.

Martell

R. F.

Simon

M. C.

(1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of women job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-372.

100.

*Heilman

M. E.

Okimoto

T. G.

(2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92.

101.

*Heilman

M. E.

Wallen

A. S.

Fuchs

Tamkins

M. M.

(2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.

102.

*Hewstone

Jaspars

Lalljee

(1982). Social representations, social attribution and social identity: The intergroup images of “public” and “comprehensive” schoolboys. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 241-269.

103.

*Isaacs

M. B.

(1981). Sex role stereotyping and the evaluation of the performance of women: Changing trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 187-195.

104.

*Izraeli

D. N.

(1987). Sex effects in the evaluation of influence tactics. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 79-86.

105.

*Jackson

L. A.

(1983). The influence of sex, physical attractiveness, sex role, and occupational sex-linkage on perceptions of occupational suitability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 31-44.

106.

*Jackson

L. A.

Cash

T. F.

(1985). Components of gender stereotypes: Their implications for inferences on stereotypic and nonstereotypic dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 326-344.

107.

*Jackson

L. A.

Hymes

R. W.

Sullivan

L. A.

(1987). The effects of positive information on evaluations of Black and White targets by Black and White subjects. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 309-316.

108.

*Jackson

L. A.

MacCoun

R. J.

Kerr

N. L.

(1987). Stereotypes and nonstereotypic judgments: The effects of gender role attitudes on ratings of likability, adjustment, and occupational potential. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 45-52.

109.

*Jackson

L. A.

Sullivan

L. A.

(1989). Cognition and affect in evaluations of stereotyped group members. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 689-672.

110.

*Jackson

L. A.

Sullivan

L. A.

Hodge

C. N.

(1993). Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.

111.

*Jenkins-Hall

Sacco

W. P.

(1967). Effect of client race and depression on evaluations by White therapists. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 10, 322-333.

112.

*Jones

(1991). Stereotyping Hispanics and Whites: Perceived differences in social roles as a determinant of ethnic stereotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 469-476.

113.

*Jones

R. H.

(1970). Sex prejudice: Effects of the inferential process of judging hireability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1013A.

114.

*Juodvalkis

J. L.

Grefe

B. A.

Hogue

Svyantek

D. J.

DeLamarter

(2003). The effects of job stereotype, applicant gender, and communication style on ratings in screening interviews. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 67-84.

115.

*Jussim

Coleman

L. M.

Lerch

(1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536

116.

*Jussim

Fleming

C. J.

Coleman

Kohberger

(1996). The nature of stereotypes: II. A multiple-process model of evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 283-312.

117.

Kalaian

H. A.

Raudenbush

S. W.

(1996). A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 227-235. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.3.227

118.

Katz

(1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

119.

Katz

Glass

D. C.

Cohen

(1973). Ambivalence, guilt, and the scapegoating of minority group victims. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 423-436.

120.

Katz

Hass

R. G.

(1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.

121.

Katz

Wackenhut

Hass

R. G.

(1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. In Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L.

(Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 35-60). Newark: Academic Press.

122.

*Kelly

J. A.

Kern

J. M.

Kirkley

B. G.

Patterson

J. N.

Keane

T. M.

(1980). Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training. Behavior Therapy, 11, 670-682.

123.

*Kenyon

Hewitt

(1989). Reaction to positive and negative behavior in same-sex vs. opposite-sex others. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 931-934.

124.

Kernahan

Bartholow

B. D.

Bettencourt

B. A.

(2000). Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Toward a comprehensive model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 85-100. doi:10.1207/15324830051036171

125.

*Khan

S. R.

Lambert

A. J.

(1998). Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 263-269.

126.

Kite

M. E.

Stockdale

G. D.

Whitley

B. E.

Jr. Johnson

B. T.

(2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241-266. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x

127.

Kunda

Thagard

(1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.284

128.

*Kwong See

S. T.

Heller

R. B.

(2004). Judging older targets’ discourse: How do age stereotypes influence evaluations? Experimental Aging Research, 30, 63-73.

129.

Landy

F. J.

(2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 379-392.

130.

*Lao

R. C.

Upchurch

W. H.

Corwin

B. J.

Grossnickle

W. F.

(1975). Biased attitudes toward females as indicated by ratings of intelligence and likeability. Psychological Reports, 37, 1315-1320.

131.

*Larimer

G. S.

Beatty

Broadus

A. C.

(1988). Indirect assessment of interracial prejudices. Journal of Black Psychology, 14, 47-56.

132.

*Larkin

E. C.

Pines

H. A.

(1979). No fat persons need apply: Experimental studies of the overweight stereotype and hiring preference. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 6, 312-327.

133.

*Larwood

Rand

der Hovanessian

(1979). Sex differences in response to simulated employee discipline cases. Personnel Psychology, 32, 539-550.

134.

*Lee

D. Y.

Hallberg

E. T.

Jones

Haase

R. F.

(1980). Effects of counselor gender on perceived credibility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 71-75.

135.

*Lenney

Mitchell

Browning

(1983). The effect of clear evaluation criteria on sex bias in judgments of performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 313-328.

136.

*Lifschitz

(1983). Male and female careers: Sex-role and occupational stereotypes among high school students. Sex Roles, 9, 725-735.

137.

*Linville

P. W.

(1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.193

138.

Linville

P. W.

Fischer

G. W.

Salovey

(1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.

139.

Linville

P. W.

Fischer

G. W.

Yoon

(1996). Perceived covariation among the features of ingroup and outgroup members: The outgroup covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421-436.

140.

*Linville

P. W.

Jones

E. E.

(1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.689

141.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

142.

Locksley

Borgida

Brekke

Hepburn

(1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.

143.

Lopez-Duran

N. L.

Kovacs

George

C. J.

(2009). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation in depressed children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1272-1283. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.03.016

144.

*Lott

Saxon

(2002). The influence of ethnicity, social class and context on judgments about U.S. women. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 481-499.

145.

*Mai-Dalton

R. R.

Feldman-Summers

Mitchell

T. R.

(1979). Effect of employee gender and behavioral style on the evaluations of male and female banking executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 221-226.

146.

*Marques

J. M.

Abrams

Paez

Martinez Taboada

(1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976

147.

*Marques

J. M.

Abrams

Serôdio

R. G.

(2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.

148.

Marques

J. M.

Paez

(1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorisation, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In Stroebe

Hewstone

(Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). Chichester, England: Wiley.

149.

Marques

J. M.

Robalo

E. M.

Rocha

S. A.

(1992). Ingroup bias and the “black sheep” effect: Assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220403

150.

*Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

(1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180308

151.

Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

Leyens

J.-P.

(1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102

152.

*Martell

R. F.

(1991). Sex bias at work: The effects of attentional and memory demands on performance ratings of men and women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1939-1960.

153.

*McCabe

A. E.

Brannon

L. A.

(2004). Effect of shifting standards on evaluations of white subtype members. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 91-92.

154.

McGuire

W. J.

McGuire

C. V.

Child

Fujioka

(1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520.

155.

*McKenzie

N. J.

(1996). When she says what he says: The influence of gender and bragging on evaluations of communication competence. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 4204.

156.

*McKimmie

B. M.

Newton

C. J.

Terry

D. J.

Schuller

R. A.

(2004). Jurors’ responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 131-143.

157.

*McKirnan

D. J.

Smith

C. E.

Hamayan

E. V.

(1983). A sociolinguistic approach to the belief-similarity model of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 434-447.

158.

*McRae

M. B.

(1991). Sex and race bias in employment decisions: Black women considered. Journal of Employment Counseling, 28, 91-98.

159.

*McRae

M. B.

(1994). Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions of Black managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 306-309.

160.

*Memon

Shuman

D. W.

(1998). Juror perception of experts in civil disputes: The role of race and gender. Law & Psychology Review, 22, 179-197.

161.

*Mettrick

Cowan

(1996). Gender stereotypes and predictions of performance: Women in air combat. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11, 105-120.

162.

*Mischel

H. N.

(1974). Sex bias in the evaluation of professional achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 157-166.

163.

*Morris

S. B.

Callahan

C. M.

Lord

R. G.

(1992, August). Gender bias in initial perceptions and subsequent hiring decisions. Paper presented at APA, Washington DC.

164.

Morris

S. B.

DeShon

R. P.

(2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105

165.

Neuberg

S. L.

Fiske

S. T.

(1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.

166.

Nowak

Heinrichs

(2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 114-144. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0033-0

167.

Olson

J. M.

Roese

N. J.

Zanna

M. P.

(1996). Expectancies. In Higgins

E. T.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

168.

*Paludi

M. A.

Bauer

W. D.

(1983). Goldberg revisited: What’s in an author’s name? Sex Roles, 9, 387-390.

169.

*Peck

(1978). When women evaluate women nothing succeeds like success! The differential effects of status upon evaluations of male and female professional ability. Sex Roles, 4, 205-213.

170.

*Phelan

J. E.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Rudman

L. A.

(2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflects backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women, 32, 406-413.

171.

*Pheterson

G. I.

Kiesler

S. B.

Goldberg

P. A.

(1971). Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 114-118.

172.

*Pirri

Eaton

Durkin

(1995). Australian professional women’s evaluations of male and female written products. Sex Roles, 32, 691-697.

173.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 812-832.

174.

*Puckett

J. M.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Fischer

D. L.

(1983). The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 340-343.

175.

Raudenbush

Bryk

Congdon

(2000). HLM 6 Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling: Scientific Software International, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/hlm/

176.

*Rickabaugh

C. A.

(1995). College students’ stereotypes of gender and political activism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 319-331.

177.

*Riggs

J. M.

(1998). Social roles we choose and don’t choose: Impressions of employed and unemployed parents. Sex Roles, 39, 431-443.

178.

*Rojahn

Willemsen

T. M.

(1994). The evaluation of effectiveness and likability of gender-role congruent and gender-role incongruent leaders. Sex Roles, 30, 109-119.

179.

*Rose

F. L.

(1978). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 104-112.

180.

*Rosen

Jerdee

T. H.

(1974). The influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 9-14.

181.

*Rosen

Jerdee

T. H.

Prestwich

T. L.

(1975). Dual-career mutual adjustment: Potential effects of discriminatory managerial attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 565-572.

182.

*Rosenthal

D. A.

(2004). Effects of client race on clinical judgment of practicing European American vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47, 131-141.

183.

*Rosenthal

D. A.

Berven

N. L.

(1999). Effects of client race on clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 243-264.

184.

*Rosenthal

D. A.

Chapman

D. C.

(1980). Sex-role stereotypes: Children’s perceptions of occupational competence. Psychological Reports, 46, 135-139.

185.

Rosenthal

(1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

186.

Roth

P. L.

Huffcutt

A. I.

Bobko

(2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694-706. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.694

187.

*Ruby

C. L.

Brigham

J. C.

(1996). A criminal schema: The role of chronicity, race, and socioeconomic status in law enforcement officials’ perceptions of others. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 95-111.

188.

*Rudman

L. A.

Fairchild

(2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157

189.

*Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1004-1010.

190.

*Saal

F. E.

Moore

(1993). Perceptions of promotion fairness and promotion candidates’ qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 105-110.

191.

Sackett

P. R.

DuBois

C. L.

(1991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873-877. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.873

192.

Schachter

(1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.

193.

*Scheier

Carver

Schultz

Glass

Katz

(1978). Sympathy, self-consciousness and reactions to the stigmatized. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 270-282.

194.

*Schimel

Simon

Greenberg

Pyszczynski

Solomon

Waxmonsky

Arndt

(1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 905-926.

195.

Schneider

Moyer

Knapp-Oliver

Sohl

Cannella

Targhetta

(2010). Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 1-14. doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9227-2

196.

*Schroeder

H. E.

Rakos

R. F.

Moe

(1983). The social perception of assertive behavior as a function of response class and gender. Behavior Therapy, 14, 534-544.

197.

*Sczensy

Spreemann

Stahlberg

(2006). Masculine = competent? Physical appearance and sex as sources of gender-stereotypic attributions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 15-23.

198.

*Shaffer

D. R.

Johnson

R. D.

(1980). Effects of occupational choice and sex role preference on the attractiveness of competent men and women. Journal of Personality, 42, 505-519.

199.

*Sinclair

Kunda

(1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885-904.

200.

*Sommers

S. R.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379.

201.

*Spence

J. T.

Helmreich

Stapp

(1975). Likability, sex-role congruence of interest, and competence: It all depends on how you ask. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 93-109.

202.

*Stroebe

Insko

C. A.

Thompson

V. D.

Layton

B. D.

(1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.

203.

*Suchner

R. W.

D. M.

(1975). Stereotypes of males and females in two occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 6, 1-8.

204.

Swim

Borgida

Maruyama

Myers

D. G.

(1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409-429. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409

205.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

206.

Tajfel

(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

207.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worschel

Austin

W. G.

(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

208.

*Taynor

Deaux

(1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.

209.

*Taynor

Deaux

(1975). Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the actor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 381-390.

210.

Turner

J. C.

(1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102

211.

Turner

J. C.

Oakes

P. J.

Haslam

S. A.

McGarty

(1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.

212.

*Vonk

Konst

(1998). Intergroup bias and correspondence bias: People engage in situational correction when it suits them. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 379-385.

213.

*Vrugt

Schabracq

(1996). Stereotypes with respect to elderly employees: The contribution of attribute information and representativeness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 287-292.

214.

*Walsh

R. P.

Connor

C. L.

(1979). Old men and young women: How objectively are their skills assessed? Journal of Gerontology, 34, 561-568.

215.

*Wann

D. L.

Koch

Knoth

Fox

Aljubaily

Lantz

C. D.

(2006). The impact of team identification on biased predictions of player performance. Psychological Record, 56, 55-66.

216.

*Wayne

J. H.

Cordeiro

B. L.

(2003). Who is a good organizational citizen? Social perception of male and female employees who use family leave. Sex Roles, 49, 233-246.

217.

*Whitehead

G. I.

Smith

S. H.

Eichhorn

J. A.

(1982). The effect of subject’s race and other’s race on judgments of causality for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 50, 193-202.

218.

Wilcox

(1995). Statistics for the social sciences. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

219.

*Wiley

M. G.

Crittenden

K. S.

(1992). By your attributions you shall be known: Consequences of attributional accounts for professional and gender identities. Sex Roles, 27, 259-276.

220.

*Wiley

M. G.

Eskilson

(1985). Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men? Sex Roles, 12, 993-1007.

221.

*Yoder

J. D.

Schleicher

T. L.

(1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171-188.