A meta-analysis that included more than 1,100 effect sizes tested the predictions of three theoretical perspectives that explain evaluative extremity in social judgment: complexity-extremity theory, subjective group dynamics model, and expectancy-violation theory. The work seeks to understand the ways in which group-based information interacts with person-based information to influence extremity in evaluations. Together, these three theories point to the valence of person-based information, group membership of the evaluated targets relative to the evaluator, status of the evaluators’ ingroup, norm consistency of the person-based information, and incongruency of person-based information with stereotype-based expectations as moderators. Considerable support, but some limiting conditions, were found for each theoretical perspective. Implications of the results are discussed.
*AbbeyA.MelbyC. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283-298.
2.
*AbramsD.HoggM. A. (1987). Language attitudes, frames of reference, and social identity: A Scottish dimension. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 201-213.
3.
*AbramsD.MarquesJ.BrownN.DougillM. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163-182. doi:10.1177/1368430202005002922
4.
AbramsD.MarquesJ. M.BrownN. J.HensonM. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
5.
*AbramsD.Randsley de MouraG.MarquesJ. M.HutchisonP. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662-678.
6.
*AbramsD.RutlandA.CameronL. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840-1856.
7.
*AbramsD.RutlandA.CameronL.MarquesJ. M. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 155-176.
8.
*AbramsonP. R.GoldbergP. A.GreenbergJ. H.AbramsonL. M. (1977). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114-124.
9.
*ArkkelinD.O’ConnorR. (1992). The “good” professional: Effects of trait-profile gender type, androgyny, and likableness on impressions of incumbents of sex-typed occupations. Sex Roles, 27, 517-532.
10.
*AtkinsonD. R.MaruyamaM.MatsuiS. (1978). Effect of counselor race and counseling approach on Asian Americans’ perceptions of counselor credibility and utility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 76-83.
11.
*BanikiotesP. G.MerluzziT. V. (1981). Impact of counselor gender and counselor sex role orientation on perceived counselor characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 342-348.
12.
*BarnettM. A.McMinimyV.FlouerG.MasbadI. (1987). Adolescents’ evaluations of peers’ motives for helping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 579-586.
13.
*Bar TalD.RavivA.AradM. (1989). Effects of information of student-teachers’ stereotypic perception of pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 143-154.
14.
*BartolK. M.ButterfieldD. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446-454.
15.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
16.
*BeanL. D. (1977). Interpersonal perception among college students as a function of sex and level of assertiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 1292.
17.
*BeauvaisC.SpenceJ. T. (1987). Gender, prejudice, and categorization. Sex Roles, 16, 89-100.
18.
*BègueL. (2001). Social judgment of abortion: A black-sheep effect in a catholic sheepfold. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 640-649.
19.
*BenedictM. E.LevineE. L. (1988). Delay and distortion: Tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 507-514.
20.
*BernsteinB. L.FigioloS. W. (1983). Gender and credibility introduction effects on perceived counselor characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 506-513.
21.
*BettencourtB. A.DillK. E.GreathouseS. A.CharltonK.MulhollandA. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1323
22.
BettencourtB. A.MillerN. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.422
23.
*BiernatM.ManisM. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5
24.
BiernatM.ManisM.NelsonT. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485
25.
*BiernatM.VescioT. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66-77.
26.
*BiernatM.VescioT. K.BillingsL. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 523-542. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199906)29:4<523::aid-ejsp944>3.0.co;2-j
27.
*BlanchardF. A.WeigelR. H.CookS. W. (1975). The effect of relative competence of group members upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 519-530.
28.
*BodenhausenG. V. (1987). Effects of social stereotypes on evidence processing: The cognitive basis of discrimination in juridic decision making (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
29.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.RothsteinH. (2007). Introduction to meta-analysis. Available from www.meta-analysis.com
30.
*BraithwaiteV. A. (1986). Old age stereotypes: Reconciling contradictions. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 353-360.
31.
*BreakwellG. M.VignolesV. L.RobertsonT. (2003). Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: The case of gender and science education. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 437-455.
32.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (Eds), A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
*BrewerM. B.HoH. K.LeeJ. Y.MillerN. (1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156-165.
34.
*BridgesJ. S.del CiampoJ. (1981). Children’s perception of the competence of boys and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 503-506.
35.
*BrischettoC. S.MerluzziT. V. (1981). Client perceptions in an initial interview as a function of therapist sex and expertness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 82-87.
36.
*BrownN. J.AbramsD. (2003). Despicability in the workplace: Effects of behavioral deviance and unlikeability on the evaluation of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2413-2426.
37.
*BucklyF. (1979). The acceptability of the stereotypic and non-stereotypic male and female. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1949-1950.
38.
*ByrneD.LondonO.ReevesK. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259-271.
39.
*ByrneD.McGrawC. (1964). Interpersonal attraction toward Negroes. Human Relations, 17, 201-213.
40.
*CarranzaM. A.RyanE. B. (1975). Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American adolescents towards speakers of English and Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 83-104.
41.
*CarterJ. A. (1978). Impressions of counselors as a function of counselor physical attractiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 28-34.
42.
*CarverC. S.GlassD. C.SnyderM. L.KatzI. (1977). Favorable evaluations of stigmatized others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 232-235.
43.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
*ColemanL. M.JussimL.KelleyS. H. (1995). A study of stereotyping: Testing three models with a sample of Blacks. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 332-356. doi:10.1177/00957984950214004
45.
CooperH. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
CooperH. M. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
*CooperH. M.BaronR. M.LoweC. A. (1975). The importance of race and social class information in the formation of expectancies about academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 312-319.
48.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification -suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.
49.
DeanM. A.RothP. L.BobkoP. (2008). Ethnic and gender subgroup differences in assessment center ratings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 685-691. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.6852008-05281-015
50.
*DeauxK. (1972). To err is humanizing. But sex makes a differences. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 3, 20-28.
51.
*DeauxK.TaynorJ. (1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32, 261-262.
52.
*DeckerW. H. (1986). Occupation and impressions: Stereotypes of males and females in three professions. Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 69-75.
53.
*De CremerD.VanbeselaereN. (1999). I am deviant, because . . . : The impact of situational factors upon the black sheep effect. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 71-79.
54.
*DeJongW. (1980). The stigma of obesity: The consequences of naïve assumptions concerning the causes of physical deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 75-87.
55.
*De La Cruz-BarreraA. (1984). Gender, race, expectancy, and interpersonal behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 701.
56.
*del BocaF. K.AshmoreR. D. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. II. A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 519-535.
57.
DickersonS. S.KemenyM. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355-391. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355
58.
*DienstbierR. A. (1970). Positive and negative prejudice: Interactions of prejudice with race and social desirability. Journal of Personality, 38, 198-215.
59.
*DietzS. M.PurkeyW. W. (1969). Teacher expectation of performance based on race of student. Psychological Reports, 24, 694.
60.
*DohertyK. T. (1998). A mind of her own: Effects of need for closure and gender on reactions to nonconformity. Sex Roles, 38, 801-819.
61.
DohertyR. W. (1998). Emotional contagion and social judgment. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 187-209. doi:10.1023/a:1022368805803
62.
EaglyA. H.AshmoreR. D.MakhijaniM. G.LongoL. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
63.
EaglyA. H.MakhijaniM. G.KlonskyB. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
64.
*EidelmanS.BiernatM. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 602-609.
65.
*EidelmanS.SilviaP. J.BiernatM. (2006). Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1153-1164. doi:10.1177/0146167206288720
66.
*ErberJ. T.CaiolaM. A.PupoF. A. (1994). Age and forgetfulness: Managing perceivers’ impressions of targets’ capability. Psychology and Aging, 9, 554-561.
67.
*ErberJ. T.LongB. (2006). Perceptions of forgetful and slow employees: Does age matter?The Journals of Gerontology, 61B, 333-339.
68.
*ErberJ. T.SzuchmanL. T.EtheartM. E. (1993). Age and forgetfulness: Young perceivers’ impressions of young and older neighbors. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 37, 91-103.
69.
*EtaughC.FolgerD. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215-223.
70.
*EtaughC.KasleyH. C. (1981). Evaluating competence: Effects of sex, marital status, and parental status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 62, 196-203.
71.
FestingerL.ThibautJ. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.
72.
FinkelsteinL. M.BurkeM. J.RajuM. S. (1995). Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 652-663. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652
73.
*FishbeinC. (1979). An investigation of sex-role stereotypes and assertive behavior in men and women. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 912.
74.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621
75.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
76.
FordJ. K.KraigerK.SchechtmanS. L. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330-337. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.330
77.
FoschiM. (1998). Double standards: Types, conditions, and consequences. Advances in Group Processes, 15, 59-80.
78.
FoschiM. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21-42.
79.
*FurlongM. J.AtkinsonD. R.CasasJ. M. (1979). Effect of counselor ethnicity and attitudinal similarity on Chicano students’ perceptions of the counselor credibility and attractiveness. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1, 41-53.
80.
*GalloisC.CallanV.JohnstoneM. (1984). Personality judgements of Australian Aborigine and White speakers: Ethnicity, sex, and context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 39-57.
81.
*GarciaD. M.ReserA. H.AmoR. B.RedersdorffS.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769-780.
82.
*GawronskiB.GeschkeD.BanseR. (2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of person-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 573-589.
83.
*GerdesE. P.KelmanJ. H. (1981). Sex discrimination: Effects of sex-role incongruence, evaluator sex, and stereotypes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 219-226.
84.
*GordonR. A.RozelleR. M.BaxterJ. C. (1989). The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on perceptions of female job applicants. Journal of Psychology, 123, 59-68.
85.
*GurwitzS. B.MarcusM. (1978). Effects of anticipated interaction, sex, and homosexual stereotypes on first impressions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 47-56.
86.
*GuttmannJ.LazarA.MoranK. (2008). Teachers’ and school children’s stereotypic perception of the child of divorce: 20 years later. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 42, 131-141.
87.
*HagenR. L.KahnA. (1975). Discrimination against competent women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 362-376.
88.
*HammenC. L.PetersS. D. (1977). Differential responses to male and female depressive reactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 994-1001.
89.
HarberK. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622-628.
90.
*HarberK. D. (2004). The positive feedback bias as a response to out-group unfriendliness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2272-2297.
91.
*HartA. J.MorryM. M. (1997). Trait inferences based on racial and behavioral cues. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 33-48. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1901_3
92.
HedgesL. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128. doi:10.2307/1164588
93.
HedgesL.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
94.
*HeilmanM. E.AmatoM. A.KaplowS.StathatosP. (1993). When similarity is a liability: The effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like and different sex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.
95.
*HeilmanM. E.BlockC. J.LucasJ. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536-544.
96.
*HeilmanM. E.BlockC. J.StathatosP. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603-625.
97.
*HeilmanM. E.ChenJ. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431-441.
98.
*HeilmanM. E.HaynesM. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in mixed-sex teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905-916.
99.
*HeilmanM. E.MartellR. F.SimonM. C. (1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of women job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-372.
100.
*HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92.
101.
*HeilmanM. E.WallenA. S.FuchsD.TamkinsM. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
102.
*HewstoneM.JasparsJ.LalljeeM. (1982). Social representations, social attribution and social identity: The intergroup images of “public” and “comprehensive” schoolboys. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 241-269.
103.
*IsaacsM. B. (1981). Sex role stereotyping and the evaluation of the performance of women: Changing trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 187-195.
104.
*IzraeliD. N. (1987). Sex effects in the evaluation of influence tactics. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 79-86.
105.
*JacksonL. A. (1983). The influence of sex, physical attractiveness, sex role, and occupational sex-linkage on perceptions of occupational suitability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 31-44.
106.
*JacksonL. A.CashT. F. (1985). Components of gender stereotypes: Their implications for inferences on stereotypic and nonstereotypic dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 326-344.
107.
*JacksonL. A.HymesR. W.SullivanL. A. (1987). The effects of positive information on evaluations of Black and White targets by Black and White subjects. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 309-316.
108.
*JacksonL. A.MacCounR. J.KerrN. L. (1987). Stereotypes and nonstereotypic judgments: The effects of gender role attitudes on ratings of likability, adjustment, and occupational potential. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 45-52.
109.
*JacksonL. A.SullivanL. A. (1989). Cognition and affect in evaluations of stereotyped group members. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 689-672.
110.
*JacksonL. A.SullivanL. A.HodgeC. N. (1993). Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.
111.
*Jenkins-HallK.SaccoW. P. (1967). Effect of client race and depression on evaluations by White therapists. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 10, 322-333.
112.
*JonesM. (1991). Stereotyping Hispanics and Whites: Perceived differences in social roles as a determinant of ethnic stereotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 469-476.
113.
*JonesR. H. (1970). Sex prejudice: Effects of the inferential process of judging hireability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1013A.
114.
*JuodvalkisJ. L.GrefeB. A.HogueM.SvyantekD. J.DeLamarterW. (2003). The effects of job stereotype, applicant gender, and communication style on ratings in screening interviews. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 67-84.
115.
*JussimL.ColemanL. M.LerchL. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
116.
*JussimL.FlemingC. J.ColemanL.KohbergerC. (1996). The nature of stereotypes: II. A multiple-process model of evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 283-312.
117.
KalaianH. A.RaudenbushS. W. (1996). A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 227-235. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.3.227
118.
KatzI. (1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119.
KatzI.GlassD. C.CohenS. (1973). Ambivalence, guilt, and the scapegoating of minority group victims. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 423-436.
120.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
121.
KatzI.WackenhutJ.HassR. G. (1986). Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 35-60). Newark: Academic Press.
122.
*KellyJ. A.KernJ. M.KirkleyB. G.PattersonJ. N.KeaneT. M. (1980). Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects for males and females and implications for assertiveness training. Behavior Therapy, 11, 670-682.
123.
*KenyonC.HewittJ. (1989). Reaction to positive and negative behavior in same-sex vs. opposite-sex others. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 931-934.
124.
KernahanC.BartholowB. D.BettencourtB. A. (2000). Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Toward a comprehensive model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 85-100. doi:10.1207/15324830051036171
125.
*KhanS. R.LambertA. J. (1998). Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 263-269.
126.
KiteM. E.StockdaleG. D.WhitleyB. E.Jr.JohnsonB. T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241-266. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x
127.
KundaZ.ThagardP. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.284
128.
*Kwong SeeS. T.HellerR. B. (2004). Judging older targets’ discourse: How do age stereotypes influence evaluations?Experimental Aging Research, 30, 63-73.
129.
LandyF. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 379-392.
130.
*LaoR. C.UpchurchW. H.CorwinB. J.GrossnickleW. F. (1975). Biased attitudes toward females as indicated by ratings of intelligence and likeability. Psychological Reports, 37, 1315-1320.
131.
*LarimerG. S.BeattyE.BroadusA. C. (1988). Indirect assessment of interracial prejudices. Journal of Black Psychology, 14, 47-56.
132.
*LarkinE. C.PinesH. A. (1979). No fat persons need apply: Experimental studies of the overweight stereotype and hiring preference. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 6, 312-327.
133.
*LarwoodL.RandP.der HovanessianA. (1979). Sex differences in response to simulated employee discipline cases. Personnel Psychology, 32, 539-550.
134.
*LeeD. Y.HallbergE. T.JonesL.HaaseR. F. (1980). Effects of counselor gender on perceived credibility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 71-75.
135.
*LenneyE.MitchellL.BrowningC. (1983). The effect of clear evaluation criteria on sex bias in judgments of performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 313-328.
136.
*LifschitzS. (1983). Male and female careers: Sex-role and occupational stereotypes among high school students. Sex Roles, 9, 725-735.
137.
*LinvilleP. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.193
138.
LinvilleP. W.FischerG. W.SaloveyP. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
139.
LinvilleP. W.FischerG. W.YoonC. (1996). Perceived covariation among the features of ingroup and outgroup members: The outgroup covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421-436.
140.
*LinvilleP. W.JonesE. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.689
141.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
142.
LocksleyA.BorgidaE.BrekkeN.HepburnC. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
143.
Lopez-DuranN. L.KovacsM.GeorgeC. J. (2009). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation in depressed children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1272-1283. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.03.016
144.
*LottB.SaxonS. (2002). The influence of ethnicity, social class and context on judgments about U.S. women. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 481-499.
145.
*Mai-DaltonR. R.Feldman-SummersS.MitchellT. R. (1979). Effect of employee gender and behavioral style on the evaluations of male and female banking executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 221-226.
146.
*MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.PaezD.Martinez TaboadaC. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976
147.
*MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.SerôdioR. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
148.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorisation, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). Chichester, England: Wiley.
149.
MarquesJ. M.RobaloE. M.RochaS. A. (1992). Ingroup bias and the “black sheep” effect: Assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220403
150.
*MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
151.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ.-P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
152.
*MartellR. F. (1991). Sex bias at work: The effects of attentional and memory demands on performance ratings of men and women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1939-1960.
153.
*McCabeA. E.BrannonL. A. (2004). Effect of shifting standards on evaluations of white subtype members. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 91-92.
154.
McGuireW. J.McGuireC. V.ChildP.FujiokaT. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520.
155.
*McKenzieN. J. (1996). When she says what he says: The influence of gender and bragging on evaluations of communication competence. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 4204.
156.
*McKimmieB. M.NewtonC. J.TerryD. J.SchullerR. A. (2004). Jurors’ responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 131-143.
157.
*McKirnanD. J.SmithC. E.HamayanE. V. (1983). A sociolinguistic approach to the belief-similarity model of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 434-447.
158.
*McRaeM. B. (1991). Sex and race bias in employment decisions: Black women considered. Journal of Employment Counseling, 28, 91-98.
159.
*McRaeM. B. (1994). Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions of Black managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 306-309.
160.
*MemonA.ShumanD. W. (1998). Juror perception of experts in civil disputes: The role of race and gender. Law & Psychology Review, 22, 179-197.
161.
*MettrickJ.CowanG. (1996). Gender stereotypes and predictions of performance: Women in air combat. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11, 105-120.
162.
*MischelH. N. (1974). Sex bias in the evaluation of professional achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 157-166.
163.
*MorrisS. B.CallahanC. M.LordR. G. (1992, August). Gender bias in initial perceptions and subsequent hiring decisions. Paper presented at APA, Washington DC.
164.
MorrisS. B.DeShonR. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105
165.
NeubergS. L.FiskeS. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.
166.
NowakC.HeinrichsN. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 114-144. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0033-0
167.
OlsonJ. M.RoeseN. J.ZannaM. P. (1996). Expectancies. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
168.
*PaludiM. A.BauerW. D. (1983). Goldberg revisited: What’s in an author’s name?Sex Roles, 9, 387-390.
169.
*PeckT. (1978). When women evaluate women nothing succeeds like success! The differential effects of status upon evaluations of male and female professional ability. Sex Roles, 4, 205-213.
170.
*PhelanJ. E.Moss-RacusinC. A.RudmanL. A. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflects backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women, 32, 406-413.
171.
*PhetersonG. I.KieslerS. B.GoldbergP. A. (1971). Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 114-118.
172.
*PirriC.EatonE.DurkinK. (1995). Australian professional women’s evaluations of male and female written products. Sex Roles, 32, 691-697.
173.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 812-832.
174.
*PuckettJ. M.PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.FischerD. L. (1983). The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 340-343.
175.
RaudenbushS.BrykT.CongdonR. (2000). HLM 6 Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling: Scientific Software International, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/hlm/
176.
*RickabaughC. A. (1995). College students’ stereotypes of gender and political activism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 319-331.
177.
*RiggsJ. M. (1998). Social roles we choose and don’t choose: Impressions of employed and unemployed parents. Sex Roles, 39, 431-443.
178.
*RojahnK.WillemsenT. M. (1994). The evaluation of effectiveness and likability of gender-role congruent and gender-role incongruent leaders. Sex Roles, 30, 109-119.
179.
*RoseF. L. (1978). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 104-112.
180.
*RosenB.JerdeeT. H. (1974). The influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 9-14.
181.
*RosenB.JerdeeT. H.PrestwichT. L. (1975). Dual-career mutual adjustment: Potential effects of discriminatory managerial attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 565-572.
182.
*RosenthalD. A. (2004). Effects of client race on clinical judgment of practicing European American vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47, 131-141.
183.
*RosenthalD. A.BervenN. L. (1999). Effects of client race on clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 243-264.
184.
*RosenthalD. A.ChapmanD. C. (1980). Sex-role stereotypes: Children’s perceptions of occupational competence. Psychological Reports, 46, 135-139.
185.
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
186.
RothP. L.HuffcuttA. I.BobkoP. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694-706. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.694
187.
*RubyC. L.BrighamJ. C. (1996). A criminal schema: The role of chronicity, race, and socioeconomic status in law enforcement officials’ perceptions of others. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 95-111.
188.
*RudmanL. A.FairchildK. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
189.
*RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1004-1010.
190.
*SaalF. E.MooreS. (1993). Perceptions of promotion fairness and promotion candidates’ qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 105-110.
191.
SackettP. R.DuBoisC. L. (1991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873-877. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.873
192.
SchachterS. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
193.
*ScheierM.CarverC.SchultzR.GlassD.KatzI. (1978). Sympathy, self-consciousness and reactions to the stigmatized. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 270-282.
194.
*SchimelJ.SimonL.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.WaxmonskyJ.ArndtJ. (1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 905-926.
195.
SchneiderS.MoyerA.Knapp-OliverS.SohlS.CannellaD.TarghettaV. (2010). Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 1-14. doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9227-2
196.
*SchroederH. E.RakosR. F.MoeJ. (1983). The social perception of assertive behavior as a function of response class and gender. Behavior Therapy, 14, 534-544.
197.
*SczensyS.SpreemannS.StahlbergD. (2006). Masculine = competent? Physical appearance and sex as sources of gender-stereotypic attributions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 15-23.
198.
*ShafferD. R.JohnsonR. D. (1980). Effects of occupational choice and sex role preference on the attractiveness of competent men and women. Journal of Personality, 42, 505-519.
199.
*SinclairL.KundaZ. (1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885-904.
200.
*SommersS. R.EllsworthP. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379.
201.
*SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1975). Likability, sex-role congruence of interest, and competence: It all depends on how you ask. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 93-109.
202.
*StroebeW.InskoC. A.ThompsonV. D.LaytonB. D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.
203.
*SuchnerR. W.MoreD. M. (1975). Stereotypes of males and females in two occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 6, 1-8.
204.
SwimJ.BorgidaE.MaruyamaG.MyersD. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409-429. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409
205.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
206.
TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
207.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorschelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
208.
*TaynorJ.DeauxK. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.
209.
*TaynorJ.DeauxK. (1975). Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the actor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 381-390.
210.
TurnerJ. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
211.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J.HaslamS. A.McGartyC. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
212.
*VonkR.KonstD. (1998). Intergroup bias and correspondence bias: People engage in situational correction when it suits them. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 379-385.
213.
*VrugtA.SchabracqM. (1996). Stereotypes with respect to elderly employees: The contribution of attribute information and representativeness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 287-292.
214.
*WalshR. P.ConnorC. L. (1979). Old men and young women: How objectively are their skills assessed?Journal of Gerontology, 34, 561-568.
215.
*WannD. L.KochK.KnothT.FoxD.AljubailyH.LantzC. D. (2006). The impact of team identification on biased predictions of player performance. Psychological Record, 56, 55-66.
216.
*WayneJ. H.CordeiroB. L. (2003). Who is a good organizational citizen? Social perception of male and female employees who use family leave. Sex Roles, 49, 233-246.
217.
*WhiteheadG. I.SmithS. H.EichhornJ. A. (1982). The effect of subject’s race and other’s race on judgments of causality for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 50, 193-202.
218.
WilcoxR. (1995). Statistics for the social sciences. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
219.
*WileyM. G.CrittendenK. S. (1992). By your attributions you shall be known: Consequences of attributional accounts for professional and gender identities. Sex Roles, 27, 259-276.
220.
*WileyM. G.EskilsonA. (1985). Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men?Sex Roles, 12, 993-1007.
221.
*YoderJ. D.SchleicherT. L. (1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171-188.
