Six studies examined the relationship between psychological entitlement and not following instructions. In Study 1, more entitled individuals were more likely to ignore instructions about how to format their responses. Studies 2–4 investigated possible boundaries on the association between entitlement and ignoring instructions; however, entitled people were more likely to ignore instructions even when following instructions was low cost for the self, instructions were given in a less controlling way, or punishment was highly likely to result from a failure to follow instructions. To explore another possible explanation for the relationship between entitlement and ignoring instructions, Study 5 examined whether entitled people were more sensitive to situations potentially unfair to them; indeed, they were more likely to reject offers in an ultimatum game. Building on this finding, in Study 6, more entitled individuals’ greater likelihood of ignoring instructions was predicted by their viewing instructions as an unfair demand on them.
AguinisH.BeatyJ. C.BoikR. J.PierceC. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.
2.
AnastasioP. A.RoseK. C. (2014). Beyond deserving more: Psychological entitlement also predicts negative attitudes toward personally relevant out-groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 593–600.
3.
BerkowitzL. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 63–108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
BrehmS. S.BrehmJ. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. London, England: Academic Press.
5.
BurgerJ. M.CaldwellD. F. (2003). The effects of monetary incentives and labeling on the foot-in-the-door effect evidence for a self-perception process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 235–241.
6.
BurtS. A.DonnellanM. B.TackettJ. L. (2012). Should social aggression be considered “antisocial”?Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 153–163.
7.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.
8.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
9.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
10.
DaddisC.BrunellA. B. (2015). Entitlement, exploitativeness, and reasoning about everyday transgressions: A social domain analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 115–126.
11.
ExlineJ. J.BaumeisterR. F.BushmanB. J.CampbellW. K.FinkelE. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912.
12.
FiskG. M.NevilleL. B. (2011). Effects of customer entitlement on service workers’ physical and psychological well-being: A study of waitstaff employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 391–405.
13.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
14.
GreenbergerE.LessardJ.ChenC.FarruggiaS. P. (2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1193–1204.
15.
GrubbsJ. B.ExlineJ. J. (2016). Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to psychological distress. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1204–1226.
16.
GrubbsJ. B.ExlineJ. J.TwengeJ. M. (2014). Psychological entitlement and ambivalent sexism: Understanding the role of entitlement in predicting two forms of sexism. Sex Roles, 70, 209–220.
17.
HarveyP.HarrisK. J.GillisW. E.MartinkoM. J. (2014). Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 204–217.
18.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and condition process analysis: A regression based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
19.
KoenigsM.TranelD. (2007). Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the ultimatum game. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 951–956.
MalhotraD.GinoF. (2011). The pursuit of power corrupts: How investing in outside options motivates opportunism in relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 559–592.
22.
McCulloughM. E.EmmonsR. A.KilpatrickS. D.MooneyC. N. (2003). Narcissists as “victims”: The role of narcissism in the perception of transgressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 885–893.
23.
MoellerS. J.CrockerJ.BushmanB. J. (2009). Creating hostility and conflict: Effects of entitlement and self-image goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 448–452.
24.
O’BrienE. H.AnastasioP. A.BushmanB. J. (2011). Time crawls when you’re not having fun: Feeling entitled makes dull tasks drag on. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1287–1296.
25.
PoonK.ChenZ.DeWallC. N. (2013). Feeling entitled to more: Ostracism increases dishonest behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1227–1239.
26.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.JrStokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.
27.
RoseK. C.AnastasioP. A. (2014). Entitlement is about ‘others’, narcissism is not: Relations to sociotropic and autonomous interpersonal styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 50–53.
28.
RuedyN. E.MooreC.GinoF.SchweitzerM. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 531–548.
29.
SnowJ. N.KernR. M.CurletteW. L. (2001). Identifying personality traits associated with attrition in systematic training for effective parenting groups. The Family Journal, 9, 102–108.
30.
TamborskiM.BrownR. P.ChowningK. (2012). Self-serving bias or simply serving the self? Evidence for a dimensional approach to narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 942–946.
31.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
32.
TylerT. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.
33.
TylerT. R.DegoeyP. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects of support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482–497.
34.
VincentL. C.KouchakiM. (2016). Creative, rare, entitled, and dishonest: How commonality of creativity in one’s group decreases an individual’s entitlement and dishonesty. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1451–1473.
35.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J. (1991). Narcissism, empathy and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 575–579.
36.
ZitekE. M.JordanA. H.MoninB.LeachF. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
