Latin America has experienced a series of recent corruption scandals, resulting in an unprecedented uncertainty in political leadership across the whole region. Within this context, we have conducted a survey study comprising nine countries in Latin America (n = 1,250) examining the stereotype content of politicians. We tested a dual effects model in which the stereotypes of politicians were predicted to shape perceptions of justice directly and indirectly through the activation of affect. Our findings revealed that politicians tended to be stereotyped with negative morality traits and with a certain degree of negativity across other stereotype dimensions. Results supported a positive direct effect of morality on perceived justice and a positive indirect effect through the activation of affect. We discuss the implications of these findings for the current political context in Latin America and also for our understanding of perceptions about politicians and their relationship with leader and power legitimacy.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
AndersonC. A.SedikidesC. (1991). Thinking about people: Contributions of a typological alternative to associationistic and dimensional models of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 203–217.
4.
BarrettL. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20–46.
5.
BarrettL. F. (2013). Psychological construction: The Darwinian approach to the science of emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 379–389.
6.
BauerN. M. (2015). Emotional, sensitive, and unfit for office? Gender stereotype activation and support female candidates. Political Psychology, 36, 691–708.
7.
BrambillaM.LeachC. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408.
8.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.
9.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.CherubiniP.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166.
10.
CameronC. D.LindquistK. A.GrayK. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions no evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advanced online publication.
11.
CameronC. D.PayneB. K.DorisJ. M. (2013). Morality in high definition: Emotion differentiation calibrates the influence of incidental disgust on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 719–725.
12.
ChangE. C. C.ChuY. (2006). Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies?Journal of Politics, 68, 259–271.
13.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2014). Trait physical disgust is related to moral judgments outside of the purity domain. Emotion, 14, 341.
14.
ChengJ. S.OttatiV. S. C.PriceE. (2013). The arousal model of moral condemnation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1012–1018.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
CrandallC. S.BeasleyR. K. (2001). A perceptual theory of legitimacy: Politics, prejudice, social institutions, and moral value. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 77–102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
20.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
21.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.HtunT. T. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33.
22.
De RaadB.PeabodyD. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474.
23.
DurkheimE. (1973). Emile Durkheim on morality and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
ErrejonI.MouffeC.JonesO. (2016). Podemos: In the name of the people. London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
25.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F. (2002). The role of emotions in determining willingness to engage in intergroup contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1202–1214.
26.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C. (2006). Stereotype content across cultures as a function of group status. In GuimondS. (Ed.), Social comparison processes and levels of analysis (pp. 249–263). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878.
28.
Garcia-MarquesL.SantosA. S. C.MackieD. M. (2006). Stereotypes: Static abstractions or dynamic knowledge structures?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 814–831.
29.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
30.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763.
31.
HeiderF. (1958). Interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
HowellD. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
33.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analyses: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–11.
36.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
37.
JostJ.HunyadyO. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.
38.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
39.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
40.
KayA. C.CzaplińskiS.JostJ. T. (2009). Left–right ideological differences in system justification following exposure to complementary versus noncomplementary stereotype exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 290–298.
41.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of” poor but happy” and” poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
42.
KlineT. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249.
44.
LernerM. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
45.
LindquistK. A. (2013). Emotions emerge from more basic psychological ingredients: A modern psychological constructionist model. Emotion Review, 5, 356–368.
46.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
47.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.
48.
ManzettiL. (2014). Accountability and corruption in Argentina during the Kirchners’ Era. Latin American Research Review, 49, 173–195.
49.
MeulemanB.BillietJ. (2011). Religious involvement: Its relation to values and social attitudes. In DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications, (pp. 173–206). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
MoriconiM. (2013). Ser violento. Los orígenes de la inseguridad y la víctima-cómplice. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Capital Intelectual.
51.
MuthénB. OMuthénL. K. (1998–2015). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
52.
OldmeadowJ.FiskeS. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status=competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.
53.
PhaletK.PoppeE. (1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703–723.
54.
RamosM. R.MoriconiM. (2015). The effects of corruption on well-being. Unpublished raw data. Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
SchmaderT.HallWCroftA. (2015). Stereotype threat in intergroup relations. In SimpsonJ.DovidioJ. F. (Ed.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 447–471).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57.
SchneiderM. C.BosA. L. (2011). An exploration of the content of stereotypes of black politicians. Political Psychology, 32, 205–233.
58.
SchneiderM. C.BosA. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35, 245–266.
59.
SchützH.SixB. (1996). How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 441–462.
60.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290.
61.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social oppression and hierarchy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SmithR. H.ParrottW. G.OzerD.MonizA. (1994). Subjective injustice and inferiority as predictors of hostile and depressive feelings of envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 705–711.
63.
SoperD. S. (2017). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
64.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
65.
TalaskaC. A.FiskeS. T.ChaikenS. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263–296.
66.
TylerT. R. (2003). Justice, identity, and leadership. In van KnippenbergD.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 94–108). London, England: Sage.
67.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review Psychology, 57, 375–400.
68.
United Nations Development Program. (2016). Citizen security with a human face: Evidence and proposals for Latin America. New York, NY: Author.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
71.
WarrenM. E. (2004). What does corruption mean in a democracy?American Journal of Political Science48, 328–343.
72.
YzerbytV.ProvostV.CorneilleO. (2005). Not competent but warm…really? Compensatory stereotypes in the French-speaking world. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 291–308.
73.
ZajoncR. (1998). Emotions. The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 591–632). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
