Data suggest that the outcome of the 2016 American presidential election was a surprise to most people. We conducted a study to examine the role parasocial bonds formed with Trump due to his appearances on reality television played in his surprising victory. Results suggested that exposure to Trump though The Apprentice and through other media predicted the formation of parasocial bonds with Trump. These parasocial bonds with Trump predicted believing Trump’s promises, disregarding his unpopular statements, and having generally more positive evaluations of him. Parasocial bonds with Trump were also a significant predictor of self-reported voting behavior, even when examined concurrently with other likely predictors. This research suggests that parasocial bonds played an important role in the election of Donald Trump to President of the United States.
AndersonN. H.BarriosA. A. (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 346–350. doi:10.1037/h0046719
2.
AschS. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi:10.1037/h0055756
3.
BranchS. E.WilsonK. M.AgnewC. R. (2013). Committed to oprah, homer, or house: Using the investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 96–109.
4.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ZimbardoP. G. (2002). When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perceptions of politicians’ personality. Political Psychology, 23, 77–95. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00271
5.
CohenJ. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication & Society, 6, 191–202.
6.
CohenJ. (2004). Parasocial breakup from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202.
7.
CohenJ. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In BryanJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
GabrielS.YoungA. F. (2011). Becoming a vampire without being bitten: The Narrative Collective Assimilation Hypothesis. Psychological Science, 22, 990–994.
15.
GabrielS.ValentiJ.YoungA. F. (2016). Chapter four-social surrogates, social motivations, and everyday activities: The case for a strong, subtle, and sneaky social self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 189–243.
16.
GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. L. (2008). Love makes you real: Favorite television characters are perceived as ‘real’ in a social facilitation paradigm. Social Cognition, 26, 156–168.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
19.
GreenM. C.ClarkJ. L. (2013). Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for entertainment media influences on tobacco use. Addiction, 108, 477–484.
20.
HochschildA. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American Right. New York, NY: New Press.
21.
HortonD.WohlR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
22.
JebrilN.AlbækE.de VreeseC. H. (2013). Infotainment, cynicism and democracy: The effects of privatization vs personalization in the news. European Journal of Communication, 28, 105–121. doi:10.1177/0267323112468683
23.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 167–171.
24.
KennyD. A. (2016). Power analsis app MedPower. Learn how you can do a mediation analysis and output a text description of your results: Go to mediational analysis using DataToText using SPSS or R. Retrieved fromhttp://www.davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
25.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 1, 1–24.
26.
LatherJ.Moyer-GuseE. (2011). How do we react when our favorite characters are taken away? An examination of a temporary parasocial breakup. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 196–215.
27.
MajorB.BlodornA.Major BlascovichG. (2016). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430216677304
OkdieB. M.EwoldsenD. R.MuscanellN. L.GuadagnoR. E.EnoC. A.VelezJ. A.…SmithL. R. (2014). Missed programs (You can’t TiVo this one): Why psychologists should study media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 180–195.
30.
PasekJ.KenskiK.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2006). America’s youth and community engagement: how use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14- to 22-year-olds. Communication Research, 33, 115–135. doi:10.1177/0093650206287073
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
32.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SandersonC. A. (2009). Intimacy goals. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 233–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
SchaffnerB. F.MacWilliamsM.NtetaT. (2017). Explaining White Polarization in the 2016 vote for President: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Paper prepared for presentation at the conference on The U.S. Elections of 2016: Domestic and international aspects. January 8–9, 2017, IDC Herzliya Campus.
35.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
36.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37.
37.
SchrammH.HartmannT. (2008). The PSI-process scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33, 385–401.
38.
van LaerT.de RuyterK.ViscontiL. M.WetzelsM. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 797–817.
39.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
