Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Facebook is a relatively new tool launched in 2004, and yet it is quickly attracting numerous people around the world. The current work examined not only how Facebook is perceived and used in independent and interdependent cultures but also how one would be subsequently influenced by the different usage of Facebook. In Study 1, we found that Korean participants had more relational/interdependent beliefs about Facebook than did American participants. Furthermore, Study 2 showed cultural differences in actual activities on Facebook, such that relational/interdependent activities on Facebook were more prevalent in Eastern than in Western cultures. Importantly, in Study 3, we found that experimentally induced interdependent usage of Facebook led to more relational reasoning. Taken together, our findings suggest that people would use Facebook in culturally appropriate ways, and further, Facebook might function as a mechanism to maintain or reinforce cultural differences in psychological processes.

Keywords

Facebook cultural differences independent/interdependent activities reasoning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyd

D. M.

Ellison

N. B.

(2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Brehm

J. W.

(1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389. doi:10.1037/h0041006

Choi

Dalal

Kim-Prieto

Park

(2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.46

Choi

Koo

Choi

J. A.

(2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. doi:10.1177/0146167206298568

Cohen

(2007). Methods in cultural psychology. In Kitayama

Cohen

(Eds.), The handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 196–236). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cumming

(2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.

Facebook Statistics. (2016). Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

10.

Festinger

Carlsmith

J. M.

(1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389. doi:10.1037/h0041593

11.

Fiske

A. P.

Kitayama

Markus

H. R.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert

D. T.

Fiske

S. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915–981). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Frank

D. H.

Wertenbroch

Maddux

W. W.

(2015). Performance pay or redistribution? Cultural differences in just–world beliefs and preferences for wage inequality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.04.001

13.

Hedges

L. V.

Olkin

(1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

14.

Huang

C.-M.

Park

D. C.

(2013). Cultural influences on Facebook photographs. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 334–343. doi:10.1080/00207594.2011.649285

15.

Kim

H. S.

Markus

H. R.

(1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity?: A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785

16.

Kim

H. S.

Sherman

D. K.

(2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self–expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1–11. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.1

17.

Kitayama

Park

Servincer

A. T.

Karasawa

Uskul

A. K.

(2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, West Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 236–255. doi:10.1037/a0015999

18.

Kosinski

Matz

S. C.

Gosling

S. D.

Popov

Stillwell

D. J.

(2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70, 543–556. doi:10.1037/a0039210

19.

Kosinski

Stillwell

D. J.

Graepel

(2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 5802–5805. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110

20.

Levitt

(1983). After the sale is over. Harvard Business Review, 61, 87–93.

21.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

22.

Markus

H. R.

Mullally

P. R.

Kitayama

(Eds.). (1997). Selfways: Diversity in modes of cultural participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Morling

Lamoreaux

(2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199–221. doi:10.1177/1088868308318260

24.

Choi

Sul

(2013). I like you because you think in the “right” way: Culture and ideal thinking. Social Cognition, 31, 390–404.

25.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E. W.

Kitayama

Gonzalez

Nisbett

R. E.

(2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 6192–6197. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001911107

26.

Kosinski

Stillwell

D. J.

(2015). When a new tool is introduced in different cultural contexts: Individualism–collectivism and social network on Facebook. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 46, 355–370. doi:10.1177/0022022114563932

27.

Nisbett

R. E.

Wilson

T. D.

(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231

28.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta–analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

29.

Park

Jun

J. K.

(2003). A cross–cultural comparison of Internet buying behavior: Effects of Internet usage, perceived risks, and innovativeness. International Marketing Review, 20, 534–553. doi:10.1108/02651330310498771

30.

Qiu

Lin

Leung

A. K. y.

(2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 106–121. doi:10.1177/0022022111434597

31.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

Fong

G. T.

(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845

32.

Triandis

H. C.

(1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 269–289. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506

33.

Wilson

R. E.

Gosling

S. D.

Graham

L. T.

(2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

How Facebook Is Perceived and Used by People Across Cultures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material