Would you rather be the big frog in a small pond or the small frog in a big pond? In three studies, we demonstrate that the entry preference depends on culture. Study 1 found a higher big pond preference for East Asian, versus European American, students. Studies 2A and 2B replicated this big pond preference in behavioral intent across educational and organizational settings for Chinese, as compared to United States, working adults. Study 3 demonstrated cultural variation in frog–pond decisions was not explained by comparison processes that characterize postentry self-regard but rather by concerns for prestige. Together, findings highlight how a cultural lens informs psychological processes that shape entry decision-making.
AlickeM. D.ZellE.BloomD. L. (2010). Mere categorization and the frog-pond effect. Psychological Science, 21, 174–177. doi:10.1177/0956797609357718
2.
BrewerM. B.ChenY. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133–151. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
3.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
4.
CarlssonF.QinP. (2010). It is better to be the head of a chicken than the tail of a phoenix: Concern for relative standing in rural China. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 180–186. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.02.003
5.
CassidyT.LynnR. (1989). A multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: The development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 301–312.
6.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125. doi:10.1037/a0030398
7.
ChungT.MalleryP. (1999). Social comparison, individualism-collectivism, and self-esteem in China and the United States. Current Psychology, 18, 340–352. doi:10.1007/s12144-999-1008-0
8.
CohenD.Hoshino-BrowneE.LeungA.-K. (2007). Culture and the structure of personal experience: Insider and outsider phenomenologies of the self and social world. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 1–67). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
CurhanK. B.LevineC. S.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS.ParkJ.KarasawaM.…RyffC. D. (2014). Subjective and objective hierarchies and their relations to psychological well-being: A U.S./Japan comparison. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 855–864. doi:10.1177/1948550614538461
10.
FalkC. F.HeineS. J.TakemuraK. (2013). Cultural variation in the minimal group effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 265–281. doi:10.1177/0022022113492892
11.
GelfandM. J.DyerN. (2000). A cultural perspective on negotiation: Progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Applied Psychology, 49, 62–99. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00006
12.
GettierE. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge?Analysis, 23, 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121
13.
GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129–142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129
14.
GladwellM. (2013). David and Goliath: Underdogs, misfits, and the art of battling giants. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
15.
Hoshino-BrowneE.ZannaA. S.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.KitayamaS.LackenbauerS. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of easterners and westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294–310. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.294
16.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.349
17.
KangP.LeeY.ChoiI.KimH. (2013). Neural evidence for individual and cultural variability in the social comparison effect. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 16200–16208. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5084-12.2013
18.
KimH.MarkusH. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
19.
KimH. S.DroletA. (2009). Express your social self: Cultural differences in choice of brand-name versus generic products. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1555–1566. doi:10.1177/0146167209348641
20.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K. (2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1–11. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.1
21.
KimY. H.CohenD.AuW. T. (2010). The jury and abjury of my peers: The self in face and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 904–916. doi:10.1037/a0017936
22.
KitayamaS.UskulA. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419–449. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145357
23.
KopelmanS. (2009). The effect of culture and power on cooperation in commons dilemmas: Implications for global resource management. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.004
24.
KopelmanS.HardinA. E.MyersC. G.TostL. P. (2016). Cooperation in multicultural negotiations: How the cultures of people with low and high power interact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 721–730. doi:10.1037/apl0000065
25.
LiL. W.MasudaT.RussellM. J. (2015). Culture and decision-making: Investigating cultural variations in the East Asian and North American online decision-making processes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 183–191. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12099
26.
ManerJ. K.MeadN. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482–497. doi:10.1037/a0018559
27.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557
28.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.MorinA. S.ParkerP.AbdelfattahF.NagengastB.Abu-HilalM. M. (2015). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability of social comparison processes over two age cohorts from Western, Asian, and Middle Eastern Islamic countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 258–271. doi:10.1037/a0037485
29.
MarshH. W.HauK. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
30.
MarshH. W.KongC.HauK. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337–349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337
31.
MoureyJ. A.OysermanD.YoonC. (2013). One without the other: Seeing relationships in everyday objects. Psychological Science, 24, 1615–1622. doi:10.1177/0956797613475631
32.
ParkJ.KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.CoeC. L.MiyamotoY.KarasawaM.…RyffC. D. (2013). Social status and anger expression: The cultural moderation hypothesis. Emotion, 13, 1122–1131. doi:10.1037/a0034273
33.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarcíaT.McKeachieW. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
34.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
35.
SasakiJ. Y.KoD.KimH. S. (2014). Culture and self-worth: Implications for social comparison processes and coping with threats to self-worth. In KrizanZ.GibbonsF. X. (Eds.), Communal functions of social comparison (pp. 230–252). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SavaniK.MarkusH. R.ConnerA. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876. doi:10.1037/a0011618
37.
SeatonM.CravenR. G. (2011). From frogs to fish: The big-fish-little-pond effect then and now. Psihološka Obzorja/Horizons of Psychology, 20, 107–120.
38.
SeatonM.MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403–419. doi:10.1037/a0013838
39.
SolnickS. J.HemenwayD. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37, 373–383. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00089-4
40.
WeberE. U.MorrisM. W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410–419. doi:10.1177/1745691610375556
41.
WhiteK.LehmanD. R. (2005). Culture and social comparison seeking: The role of self-motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 232–242. doi:10.1177/0146167204271326
42.
YukiM. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166–183. doi:10.2307/1519846
43.
YukiM. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48–62. doi:10.1177/0146167204271305
44.
ZellE.AlickeM. D. (2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 467–482. doi:10.1037/a0015453
45.
ZellE.AlickeM. D. (2010). The local dominance effect in self-evaluation: Evidence and explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 368–384. doi:10.1177/1088868310366144
46.
ZouX.TamK.-P.MorrisM. W.LeeS.-L.LauI. Y.-M.ChiuC.-Y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597. doi:10.1037/a0016399
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
