Correlations among distinct behaviors are foundational to personality science, but the field remains far from a consensus regarding the causes of such covariation. We advance a novel explanation for personality covariation, which views trait covariance as being shaped within a particular socioecology. We hypothesize that the degree of personality covariation observed within a society will be inversely related to the society’s socioecological complexity, that is, its diversity of social and occupational niches. Using personality survey data from participant samples in 55 nations (N = 17,637), we demonstrate that the Big Five dimensions are more strongly intercorrelated in less complex societies, where the complexity is indexed by nation-level measures of economic development, urbanization, and sectoral diversity. This inverse relationship is robust to control variables accounting for a number of methodological and response biases. Our findings support the socioecological complexity hypothesis and more generally bolster functionalist accounts of trait covariation.
AgrestiA. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
2.
AndersonC.HildrethJ. A. D.HowlandL. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.GoldbergL. R.De VriesR. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91.
4.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PaunonenS. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245–252.
5.
BaileyD. H.WalkerR. S.BlomquistG. E.HillK. R.HurtadoA. M.GearyD. C. (2013). Heritability and fitness correlates of personality in the Ache, a natural fertility population in Paraguay. PLoS One, 8, e59325.
6.
Benet-MartinezV.JohnO. P. (1998). Los cincos grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
7.
BleidornW.KlimstraT. A.DenissenJ. J. A.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540.
8.
BonnerJ. T. (2004). The size-complexity rule. Evolution, 58, 1883–1890.
9.
BorsboomD.MellenberghG. J.van HeerdenJ. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.
10.
CarneiroR. L. (1967). Relationship between size of population and complexity of social organization. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 23, 234–243.
11.
CattellR. B. (1950). Describing personality through traits. In CattellR. B. (Ed.), Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study (pp. 21–24). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12.
CramerA. O. J.Van Der SluisS.NoordhofA.WichersM.GeschwindN.AggenS. H.…BoorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431.
13.
De RaadB. (1994). An expedition in search of a fifth universal factor: Key issues in the lexical approach. European Journal of Personality, 8, 229–250.
14.
DigmanJ. M. (1997). Higher order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.
15.
FeinmanG. M.NeitzelJ. (1984). Too many types: An overview of sedentary prestate societies in the Americas. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 39–102.
16.
FigueredoA. J.WolfP. S. A.GladdenP. R.OlderbakS.AndrzejczakD. J.JacobsW. J. (2011). Ecological approaches to personality. In BussD. M.HawleyP. H. (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 210–239). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
GebauerJ. E.BleidornW.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.LambM. E.PotterJ. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relations with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091.
18.
GurvenM.von RuedenC.MassenkoffM.KaplanH.Lero VieM. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
19.
GurvenM.WinkingJ.KaplanH.von RuedenC. R.McAllisterL. (2009). A bioeconomic approach to marriage and the sexual division of labor. Human Nature, 20, 151–183.
20.
HausmannR.HidalgoC. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HenrichJ.BoydR.BowlesC.CamererC.FehrE.GintisH.…TracerD. (2005). ‘Economic man’ in cross-cultural perspective: Economic experiments in 15 small scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795–855.
22.
JaeggiA. V.HooperP. L.BeheimB. A.KaplanH.GurvenM. (2016). Reciprocal exchange patterned by market forces helps explain cooperation in a small-scale society. Biology Letters. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.019
23.
JeansonR.FewellJ. H.GorelickR.BertramS. M. (2007). Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 289–298.
24.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–159). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
KaplanH. S.HooperP. L.GurvenM. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 3289–3299.
26.
KellyR. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
27.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). The HEXACO Personality Inventory: A new measure of the major dimensions of personality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
28.
LaskowskiK. L.MontiglioP.PruittJ. N. (2016). Individual and group performance suffers from social niche disruption. The American Naturalist, 187, 776–785.
29.
LukaszewskiA. W. (2013). Testing an adaptationist theory of trait covariation: Relative bargaining power as a common calibrator of an interpersonal syndrome. European Journal of Personality, 27, 319–410.
30.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
McCraeR. R.YamagataS.JangK. L.RiemannR.AndoJ.OnoY.…SpinathF. M. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 442–455.
32.
MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121.
33.
MisesL. v. (1949). Human action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
MusekJ. (2007). A General Factor of Personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.
35.
NettleD. (2011). Evolutionary perspectives on the five factor model of personality. In BussD. M.HawleyP. H. (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 5–28). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
PanW. (2001). Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57, 120–125.
37.
PanzarJ. C.WilligR. D. (1981). Economies of scope. The American Economic Review, 71, 268–272.
38.
PowersS. T.LehmannL. (2014). An evolutionary model explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to leadership and despotism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 281, 20141349.
39.
PowersS. T.van SchaikC. P.LehmannL. (2016). How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 371, 20150098.
40.
RidleyM. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
41.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
SaucierG.ThalmayerA. G.PayneD. L.CarlsonR.SanogoL.Ole-KotikashL.…ZhouX. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14.
43.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642.
44.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ.McCraeR. R.Benet-MartinezV.AlcalayL.AultL. (2007). The geographic distribution of the Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.
45.
SihA.MathotK. J.MoironM.MontiglioP.WolfM.DingemanseN. J. (2015). Animal personality and state-behavior feedbacks: A review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 50–60.
46.
SteencampJ. E. M.BaumgartnerS. H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.
47.
StewartF. (2013). Capabilities and human development. New York, NY: United Nations Development Program.
48.
StieglitzJ.GurvenM.KaplanH.HooperP. (2013). Household task delegation among high-fertility forager-horticulturalists of lowland Bolivia. Current Anthropology, 54, 232–241.
49.
SugiyamaL. S.Scalise-SugiyamaM. (2003). Social roles, prestige, and health risk: Social niche specialization as a risk-buffering strategy. Human Nature, 14, 165–190.
50.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL.PriceM. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 103–129.
51.
van der LindenD.NijenhuisJ. T.BakkerA. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.
52.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 402–415.
53.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH.StieglitzJ. (2014). Leadership in an egalitarian society. Human Nature, 25, 538–566.
54.
von RuedenC.LukaszewskiA. W.GurvenM. (2015). Adaptive personality calibration in a human society: Effects of embodied capital on prosocial traits. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 1071–1082.
55.
WestfallJ.YarkoniT. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11, e0152719.
56.
WolfM.KrauseJ. (2014). Why personality differences matter for social functioning and social structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 306–308.
57.
WoodD.GardnerM. H.HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
