Two studies examine whether the workplace motherhood penalty and fatherhood bonus are better conceived, respectively, as a caregiver penalty and breadwinner bonus. Participants acting as employers structured offers for married female or male job candidates with children. In Study 1, participants assumed “mother = caregiver” and “father = breadwinner.” These assumptions moderated significantly higher salary offers to fathers and more (explicitly career-dampening) flexible schedules to mothers. Study 2 manipulated family roles (nonparent, parent-unspecified role, parent-breadwinner, and parent-caregiver). Supporting a breadwinner bonus, the female candidate fared best in salary and leadership training offers when labeled a breadwinner (vs. caregiver and unspecified role), equaling a male breadwinner’s offer. A caregiver penalty decreased salary for caregivers of both sexes and leadership training for women (compared to breadwinners) but not men. Thus, the motherhood penalty can become a breadwinner bonus if mothers present themselves as family breadwinners.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
2.
AmanatullahE. T.TinsleyC. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 110–122. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006
3.
ArandaB.GlickP. (2014). Expressing work devotion eliminates the motherhood penalty. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 91–99.
4.
BabcockL.LascheverS. (2003). Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BossonJ. K.Prewitt-FreilinoJ. L.TaylorJ. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552
7.
BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 436–445. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00244.x
8.
BudigM.EnglandP. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657415
9.
Catalyst. (2016). Catalyst quick take: Women’s earnings and income. New York, NY: Catalyst.
10.
CorrellS. J.BenardS.PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1339. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/511799
11.
CroftA.SchmaderT.BlockK. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868314564789
12.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2004).When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
13.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
17.
FuegenK.BiernatM.HainesE.DeauxK. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737–754. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00383.x
18.
GlauberR. (2008). Race and gender in families and at work. Gender & Society, 22, 8–30.
19.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2007). Sex discrimination: The psychological approach. In CrosbyF. J.StockdaleM. S.RoppS. A. (Eds.). Sex discrimination in the workplace (pp. 155–187). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20.
HallE. V.GalinskyA. D.PhillipsK. W. (2015). Gender profiling: A gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 853–868. doi:10.1177/0146167215580779
21.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189–198. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
22.
HodgesM. J.BudigM. J. (2010). Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender & Society, 24, 717–745. doi:10.1177/0891243210386729
23.
LeslieL. M.ManchesterC. F.ParkT. Y.MehngS. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties?Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1407–1428. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
LynessK. S.JudieschM. K. (2001). Are female managers quitters? The relationships of gender, promotions, and family leaves of absence to voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1167–1178. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1167
26.
Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.RudmanL. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 140–151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018093
27.
RogierS. A.PadgettM. Y. (2004). The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 89–106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1089
28.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
29.
RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?Journal of Social Issues, 69, 322–340. doi:10.1111/josi.12017
30.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.GlickP.PhelanJ. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167–228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179.
32.
StoneP.HernandezL. A. (2013). The all-or-nothing workplace: Flexibility stigma and “opting out” among professional-managerial women. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 235–256.
33.
VandelloJ. A.HettingerV. E.BossonJ. K.SiddiqiJ. (2013). When equal isn’t really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 303–321. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12016
