The ability to differentiate in-group from out-group members on the basis of symbolic cues may be unique to Homo sapiens. The current research examined whether meaningful cues of in-group status moderate ovulatory shifts—a psychological adaptation that likely evolved earlier in humans’ evolutionary timeline. Four studies demonstrated that men were more attracted to fertile than nonfertile women’s voices only when men were evaluating in-group members. In Study 1, the fertility of Caucasian, but not Hispanic, women’s voices positively predicted 92 Caucasian male students’ attraction ratings. Study 2a (N = 56) replicated this effect among older participants, and Study 2b (N = 233) included a public preregistration and replicated it again. Study 3 replicated the effect in a sample of 47 Caucasian male students, and an experimental manipulation of the targets’ school membership produced a conceptual replication. These results stress the utility of considering the phylogeny of human evolution when testing evolutionary hypotheses.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.AinsworthS. E.VohsK. D. (2015). Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 1–38.
3.
BrewerM. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
4.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728–738.
5.
BrewerM. B.CaporaelL. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on social identity: Revisiting groups. In SchallerM.SimpsonJ.KenrickD. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 143–161). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
BroderA.HohmannN. (2003). Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 391–398.
7.
BurkartJ. M.HrdyS. B.Van SchaikC. P. (2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 18, 175–186.
8.
BussD. M. (2015). The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1–2). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
DiamondL. M.WallenK. (2011). Sexual minority women’s sexual motivation around the time of ovulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 237–246.
10.
EastwickP. W. (2009). Beyond the Pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 794–821.
11.
EastwickP. W. (2013). Cultural influences on attraction. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), Handbook of close relationships (pp. 161–182). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
EastwickP. W.DuranteK. W. (2015). Adaptive workarounds. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 92–96.
13.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2012). The evolutionary armistice: Attachment bonds moderate the function of ovulatory cycle adaptations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 174–184.
14.
FairbanksG. (1960). Voice and articulation handbook. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
15.
FeinbergD. R.JonesB. C.Law SmithM. J.MooreF. R.DeBruineL. M.CornwellR. E.,…PerrettD. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222.
16.
FraleyR. C.BrumbaughC. C.MarksM. J. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731–746.
17.
GainesS. O.JrLeaverJ. (2002). Interracial relationships. In GoodwinR.CramerD. (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 65–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
GangestadS. W.Garver-ApgarC. E. (2013). The nature of female sexuality: Insights into the dynamics of romantic relationships. In SimpsonJ. L.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 374–399). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preference for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262, 727–733.
20.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 991–1000.
21.
Garver-ApgarC. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.MillerR. D.OlpJ. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835.
22.
GoslingS. D.GraybealA. (2007). Tree thinking: A new paradigm for integrating comparative data in psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 134, 259–277.
23.
HaseltonM. G.GangestadS. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.
24.
JarvisB. G. (2010). MediaLab (Version 2010.2.19) [Computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
25.
KlavinaL.BuunkA. P.PolletT. V. (2011). Out-group mating threat and disease threat increase implicit negative attitudes toward the out-group among men. Frontiers in Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 76.
26.
KurzbanR.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.
27.
LittleA. C.JonesB. C.BurrissR. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 633–639.
28.
McDonaldM. M.AsherB. D.KerrN. L.NavarreteC. D. (2011). Fertility and intergroup bias in racial and minimal-group contexts: Evidence for shared architecture. Psychological Science, 22, 860–865.
29.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K. (2010a). Evolution and relationship maintenance: Fertility cues lead committed men to devalue relationship alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1081–1084.
30.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K. (2010b). Scent of a woman: Men’s testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Psychological Science, 21, 276–283.
31.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K. (2011). Ovulation as a male mating prime: Subtle signs of women’s fertility influence men’s mating cognition and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 295–308.
32.
MithenS. J. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: The cognitive origins of art, religion, and science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. T. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease fears and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 270–282.
34.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. T.FleischmanD. S.GeyerJ. (2009). Race bias tracks conception risk across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 20, 661–665.
35.
PipitoneR. N.GallupG. G. (2008). Women’s voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 268–274.
36.
PokornyJ. J.de WaalF. B. M. (2009). Face recognition in capuchin monkeys (Cebus paella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 151–160.
37.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
SchallerM.MurrayD. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212–221.
39.
SchallerM.ParkJ. H. (2011). The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 99–103.
40.
SherifM.HarveyO. J.WhiteB. J.HoodW. R.SherifC. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robber’s Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
41.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allow presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
42.
TajfelH. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.
43.
TidwellN. D.EastwickP. W. (2013). Sex differences in succumbing to sexual temptations: A function of impulse or control?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1620–1633.
WilcoxA. J.DuncanD. B.WeinbergC. R.TrussellJ.BairdD. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211–215.
46.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of men and women: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
