Research typically reveals that outgroups are regarded with disinterest at best and hatred and enmity at worst. Working from an evolutionary framework, we identify a unique pattern of outgroup attraction. The small-group lifestyle of pre-human ancestors plausibly limited access to genetically diverse mates. Ancestral females may have solved the inbreeding dilemma while balancing parental investment pressures by mating with outgroup males either via converting to an outgroup or cuckolding the ingroup. A vestige of those mating strategies might manifest in human women as a cyclic pattern of attraction across the menstrual cycle, such that attraction to outgroup men increases as fertility increases across the cycle. Two studies, one using a longitudinal method and the other an experimental method, evidenced the hypothesized linear relationship between attraction to outgroup men and fertility in naturally cycling women.
AielloL. C.DunbarR. I. M. (1993). Neocortex size, group size, and the evolution of language. Current Anthropology, 34, 184-193.
2.
AlvergneA.LummaaV. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 171-179.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
4.
BoboL.ZubrinskyC. L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice?Social Forces, 74, 883-909.
5.
BoldryJ. G.GaertnerL.QuinnJ. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 157-178.
6.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
7.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 695-715). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BrewerM. B.CaporaelL. R. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on social identity: Revisiting Groups. In SchallerM.SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 141-161). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
9.
BrookB. W.BradshawC. J. A.TraillL. W.FrankhamR. (2011). Minimum viable population size: Not magic, but necessary. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 619-620.
10.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
11.
CaporaelL. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276-298.
12.
CaporaelL. R. (2001). Parts and wholes: The evolutionary importance of groups. In SedikidesC.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 241-258). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
13.
CaporaelL. R. (2007). Evolutionary theory for social and cultural psychology. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 3-18). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
CaporaelL. R.BrewerM. B. (1991). Reviving evolutionary psychology: Biology meets society. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 187-195.
15.
ChapaisB. (2008). Primeval kinship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ChapaisB. (2013). Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 52-65.
17.
CharlesworthD.WillisJ. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 783-796.
18.
Clutton-BrockT. H. (1989). Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature, 337, 70-72.
19.
De HouwerJ. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
20.
DrigotasS. M.SafstromC. A.GentiliaT. (1999). An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 509-524.
21.
DunbarR. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size, and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735.
22.
DuranteK. M.GriskeviciusV.SimpsonJ. A.LiN. P. (2012). Ovulation leads women to perceive sexy cads as good dads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 292-305.
23.
FesslerD. M. T.NavarreteC. D. (2003). Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Evolution & Human Behavior, 24, 406-417.
24.
FiskeS. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299-322.
25.
FoleyR. (1996). The adaptive legacy of human evolution: A search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4, 194-203.
26.
GaertnerL.IuzziniJ.GuerreroW. M.OriñaM. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive ingroup regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
27.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 1084-1121). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
29.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A.CousinsA. J.Garver-ApgarC. E.ChristensenP. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203-207.
30.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 265, 927-933.
31.
GarnettS. T.ZanderK. K. (2011). Minimum viable population limitations ignore evolutionary history. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 618-619.
32.
Garver-ApgarC. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillG. R. (2008). Hormonal correlates of women’s mid-cycle preference for the scent of symmetry. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 223-232.
33.
Garver-ApgarC. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.MillerR. D.OlpJ. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830-835.
34.
GildersleeveK. A.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205-1259.
35.
GramzowR. H.GaertnerL. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801-815.
36.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
37.
HewstoneM.HantziA.JohnstonL. (1991). Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 517-528.
38.
HillK. R.WalkerR. S.BozicevicM.EderJ.HeadlandT.HewlettB.. . . WoodB. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286-1289.
39.
InskoC. A.SchoplerJ. (1998). Differential distrust of groups and individuals. In SedikidesC.SchoplerJ.InskoC. A. (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 75-107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
LiebermanD.PillsworthE. G.HaseltonM. G. (2011). Kin affiliation across the ovulatory cycle: Females avoid fathers when fertile. Psychological Science, 22, 13-18.
41.
MarlowF. W. (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 54-67.
42.
McDonaldM. M.AsherB. D.KerrN. L.NavarreteC. D. (2011). Fertility and intergroup bias in racial and minimal-group contexts: Evidence for shared architecture. Psychological Science, 22, 860-865.
43.
MeltzerA. L. (2016). Wives with masculine husbands report increased marital satisfaction near peak fertility. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/ebs0000083
44.
MullenB.HuL. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
45.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. T.FleischmanD. S.GeyerJ. (2009). Race bias tracks conception risk across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 20, 661-665.
46.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2010). Evolutionary social psychology. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 761-796). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2003). Relations between implicit measures of prejudice. What are we measuring?Psychological Science, 14, 636-639.
48.
OlssonA.EbertJ. P.BanajiM. R.PhelpsE. A. (2005). The role of social groups in the persistence of learned fear. Science, 309, 785-787.
49.
OstromT. M.SedikidesC. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536-552.
50.
PennA. J.PottsW. K. (1999). The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. The American Naturalist, 153, 145-164.
51.
Penton-VoakI. S.PerrettD. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically—Further evidence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 21, 39-48.
52.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
53.
PutsD. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 388-397.
54.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data Analysis models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
RobertsS. C.LittleA. C. (2008). Good genes, complementary genes, and human mate preferences. Genetica, 132, 309-321.
56.
SchallerM.NeubergS. L. (2012). Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1-54.
57.
SchallerM.SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.). (2006). Evolution and social psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
58.
SchoplerJ.InskoC. A.WieselquistJ.PembertonM.WitcherB.KozarR.…WildschutT. (2001). When groups are more competitive than individuals: The domain of the discontinuity effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 632-644.
59.
SearsD. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
60.
SedikidesC.SkorownskiJ. J. (1997). The symbolic self in evolutionary context. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 80-102.
61.
SennC. Y.DzinasK. (1996). Measuring fear of rape: A new scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 141-144.
62.
StevensL. A.FiskeS. T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13, 189-214.
63.
StringerC.McKieR. (1997). African exodus: The origins of modern humanity. London, England: Cape.
64.
TattersallI. (2012). Masters of the planet: In search for our human origins. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
66.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67.
ThornhillR.ThornhillN. W. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 363-421.
68.
TraillL. W.BradshawC. J. A.BrookB. W. (2007). Minimum viable population size: A meta-analysis of 30 years of published estimates. Biological Conservation, 139, 159-166.
69.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
70.
Van VugtM. (2009). Sex differences in intergroup competition, aggression, and warfare: The male warrior hypothesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 124-134.
71.
Van VugtM.De CremerD.JanssenD. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior Hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19-23.
72.
WangL.MaxwellS. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20, 63-83.
73.
WilcoxA. J.DunsonD. B.WeinbergC. R.TrussellJ.BairdD. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211-215.
74.
WilsonD. S.SoberE. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585-654.
75.
WobstH. M. (1974). Boundary conditions for Paleolithic social systems: A simulation approach. Society for American Archaeology, 39, 147-178.
76.
WoodW.KresselL.JoshiP.LouieB. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229-249.
77.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
