Many studies find that when made to feel uncertain, participants respond by affirming importantly held beliefs. However, while theories argue that these effects should persist over time for highly disruptive experiences, almost no research has been performed outside the lab. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 1,613) who were followed longitudinally for 3 years. Participants reported lifetime and recent adversities experienced annually, as well as their opinions on a number of questions related to intergroup hostility and aggression toward out-groups, similar to those used in many lab studies of uncertainty. We anticipated that those who had experienced adversity would show more extreme support for their position. There was a positive relationship between adversity and the tendency to strongly affirm and polarize their positions. Results suggest that adverse life events may lead to long-lasting changes in one’s tendency to polarize one’s political attitudes.
BardiA.LeeJ. A.Hofmann-TowfighN.SoutarG. (2009). The structure of intraindividual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 913–929.
2.
BlumS.SilverR. C.PoulinM. J. (2014). Perceiving risk in a dangerous world: Associations between life experiences and risk perceptions. Social Cognition, 32, 297–314.
3.
BurkeB. L.MartensA.FaucherE. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195.
4.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.PaladinoM. P.SacchiS. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135–143.
5.
ChenC.LeeS.-Y.StevensonH. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175.
6.
CunninghamW. H.CunninghamI. C. M.GreenR. T. (1977). The ipsative process to reduce response set bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 379–384.
7.
DanielE.FortunaK.ThrunS. K.CiobanS.KnafoA. (2013). Brief report: Early adolescents’ value development at war time. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 651–655.
8.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.RosenblattA.VeederM.KirklandS.LyonD. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.
9.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932–942.
10.
HayesA. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385–410.
11.
HeineS. J.ProulxT.VohsK. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.
12.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
13.
HirschbergerG.PyszczynskiT.Ein-DorT. (2009). Vulnerability and vigilance: Threat awareness and perceived adversary intent moderate the impact of mortality salience on intergroup violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 597–607.
14.
HoggM. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 338–342.
15.
HoggM. A.AdelmanJ. (2013). Uncertainty-identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 436–454.
16.
HolmanE. A.SilverR. C.WaitzkinH. (2000). Traumatic life events in primary care patients: A study in an ethnically diverse sample. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 802–810.
17.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: The Free Press.
18.
JonasE.MartensA.KayserD. N.FritscheI.SullivanD.GreenbergJ. (2008). Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: The interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1239–1251.
19.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.…QuirinM. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 219–286.
20.
KosloffS.GreenbergJ.WeiseD.SolomonS. (2010). The effects of mortality salience on political preferences: The roles of charisma and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 139–145.
21.
LandauM. J.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.PyszczynskiT.ArndtJ.…CookA. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.
22.
McIntoshD. N.SilverR. C.WortmanC. B. (1993). Religion’s role in adjustment to a negative life event: Coping with the loss of a child. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 812–821.
23.
McGregorI.NashK.MannN.PhillsC. E. (2010). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 133–147.
24.
McGregorI.PrenticeM.NashK. (2013). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religious, idealistic, and lifestyle extremes. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 537–563.
25.
MorganG. S.WisneskiD. C.SkitkaL. J. (2011). The expulsion from Disneyland: The social psychological impact of 9/11. American Psychologist, 66, 447–454.
26.
OrehekE.FishmanS.DechesneM.DoosjeB.KruglanskiA. W.ColeA. P.…JacksonT. (2010). Need for closure and the social response to terrorism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 279–290.
27.
ParkC. L.MillsM. A.EdmondsonD. (2012). PTSD as meaning violation: Testing a cognitive worldview perspective. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 66–73.
28.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method of personality assessment. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD., & R Core Team. (2014). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package version 3.1-118).
30.
PoulinM. J.SilverR. C.Gil-RivasV.HolmanA. E.McIntoshD. N. (2009). Finding social benefits after a collective trauma: Perceiving societal changes and well-being following 9/11. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 81–90.
31.
ProulxT.HeineS. J. (2008). The case of the transmogrifying experimenter: Affirmation of a moral schema following implicit change detection. Psychological Science, 19, 1294–1300.
32.
ProulxT.MajorB. (2013). A raw deal: Heightened liberalism following exposure to anomalous playing cards. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 455–472.
33.
PyszczynskiT.AbdollahiA.SolomonS. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525–537.
34.
RandlesD.HeineS. J.SantosN. (2013). The common pain of surrealism and death: Acetaminophen reduces compensatory affirmation following meaning threats. Psychological Science, 24, 966–973.
35.
RandlesD.InzlichtM.ProulxT.TullettA. M.HeineS. J. (2015). Is dissonance reduction a special case of fluid compensation? Evidence that dissonant cognitions cause compensatory affirmation and abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 697–710.
36.
RandlesD.ProulxT.HeineS. J. (2011). Turn-frogs and careful-sweaters: Non-conscious perception of incongruous word pairings provokes fluid compensation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 246–249.
37.
RobinsL. N.JelzerJ. E.CroughanJ.RatcliffK. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.
38.
SeeryM. D.HolmanE. A.SilverR. C. (2010). Whatever does not kill us: Cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1025–1041.
39.
ShambaughG.MatthewR.SilverR. C.McDonaldB.PoulinM.BlumS. (2010). Public perceptions of traumatic events and policy preferences during the George W. Bush administration: A portrait of America in turbulent times. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33, 55–91.
40.
SibleyC. G.BulbuliaJ. (2003). Faith after an earthquake: A longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before and after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake. Plos One, 7, e49648.
41.
SilverR. C.UpdegraffJ. A. (2013). Searching for and finding meaning following personal and collective traumas. In MarkmanK. D.ProulxT.LindbergM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 237–255). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
UeckerJ. E. (2008). Religious and spiritual responses to 9/11: Evidence from the Add Health Study. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 477–509.
43.
van den BosK. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 197–217.
44.
WeiseD. R.PyszczynskiT.CoxC. R.ArndtJ.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.KosloffS. (2008). Interpersonal politics: The role of terror management and attachment processes in shaping political preferences. Psychological Science, 19, 448–455.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
