For decades, increasing intergroup contact has been the preferred method for improving cooperation between groups. However, even proponents of this approach acknowledge that intergroup contact may not be effective in the context of intractable conflicts. One question is whether anything can be done to increase the impact of intergroup contact on cooperation. In the present study, we tested whether changing perceptions of group malleability in a pre-encounter intervention could increase the degree of cooperation during contact encounters. Jewish and Palestinian-Israeli adolescents (N = 141) were randomly assigned either to a condition that taught that groups are malleable or to a coping, control condition. During a subsequent intergroup encounter, we used two behavioral tasks to estimate the levels of cooperation. Results indicated that relative to controls, participants in the group malleability condition showed enhanced cooperation. These findings suggest new avenues for enhancing the impact of contact in the context of intractable conflicts.
Abu-NimerM. (2004). Education for coexistence and Arab-Jewish encounters in Israel: Potential and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 405–422.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Books.
3.
AverillJ. R. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In PlutchikR.KellermanH. (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience (pp. 305–339). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
Bar-TalD. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bar-TalD.HalperinE.De RiveraJ. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 441–460.
6.
Bar-TalD.LabinD. (2001). The effect of a major event on stereotyping: Terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents’ perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 265–280.
7.
Bar-TalD.RavivA.RavivA.Dgani-HirshA. (2008). The influence of the ethos of conflict on Israeli Jews’ interpretation of Jewish–Palestinian encounters. Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi:10.1177/0022002708325942
8.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
BlanchardF. A.WeigelR. H.CookS. W. (1975). The effect of relative competence of group members upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 519–530.
10.
BrewerM. B. (1996). When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 291–303.
11.
BrewerM. B.KramerR. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243.
12.
ChiuC.DweckC. S.TongJ. Y.FuJ. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923–940.
13.
DahlR. E. (2004). Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. Keynote address. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 1–22.
14.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
15.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.KawakamiK. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 5–21.
16.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
17.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
18.
DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the middle-east, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622.
19.
HalabiR.SonnenscheinN. (2004). The Jewish-Palestinian encounter in a time of crisis. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 373–387.
HalperinE. (2015). Emotions in conflict: Inhibitors and facilitators of peace making. Oxford, England: Routledge.
22.
HalperinE.Cohen-ChenS.GoldenbergA. (2014). Indirect emotion regulation in intractable conflicts: A new approach to conflict resolution. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 1–31.
23.
HalperinE.CrispR. J.HusnuS.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S.GrossJ. J. (2012). Promoting intergroup contact by changing beliefs: Group malleability, intergroup anxiety, and contact motivation. Emotion, 12, 1192–1195. doi:10.1037/a0028620
24.
HalperinE.RussellA. G.TrzesniewskiK. H.GrossJ. J.DweckC. S. (2011). Promoting the middle-east peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333, 1767–1769. doi:10.1126/science.1202925
25.
KelmanH. C. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.
26.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2013). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). Retrieved fromhttp://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
27.
MansteadA. S.FischerA. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, research, application (pp. 221–232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
MaozI. (2002). Is there contact at all? Intergroup interaction in planned contact interventions between Jews and Arabs in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 185–197.
29.
MaozI. (2011). Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 115–125.
30.
MillerD. A.SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2004). Effects of intergroup contact and political predispositions on prejudice: Role of intergroup emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 221–237.
31.
ParkinsonB. (2011). Interpersonal emotion transfer: Contagion and social appraisal. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 428–439.
32.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
34.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
35.
SaguyT.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432–445. doi:10.1177/0146167207311200
36.
SamiiC. (2013). Perils or promise of ethnic integration? Evidence from a hard case in Burundi. American Political Science Review, 107, 558–573.
37.
ShternM. (2016). Urban neoliberalism vs. ethno-national division: The case of west Jerusalem’s shopping malls. Cities, 52, 132–139.
38.
TroppL. R. (2015). Dismantling an ethos of conflict: Strategies for improving intergroup relations. In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts (pp. 159–171). New York, NY: Springer.
WagnerU.HewstoneM. (2012). Intergroup contact. In TroppL. R. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 193–209). New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
41.
WilliamsR. M. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
42.
WujecT. (1995). Five star mind: Games and exercises to stimulate your creativity and imagination. New York, NY: Random House.
43.
YeagerD. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2013). An implicit theories of personality intervention reduces adolescent aggression in response to victimization and exclusion. Child Development, 84, 970–988.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
