Hostile sexism encompasses aggressive attitudes toward women who contest men’s power and suspicions that women will manipulate men by exploiting their relational dependence. Prior research has shown that these attitudes predict greater aggression toward female relationship partners, but has overlooked the contexts in which such aggression should occur. The present research identified an important contextual factor that determines when men’s hostile sexism is (and when it is not) associated with relationship aggression. Men who more strongly endorsed hostile sexism were more aggressive toward their female partners during couples’ daily life (Study 1) and conflict discussions (Study 2), but only when their female partners were perceived to be, or reported being, low in relationship commitment. These findings show that men who endorse hostile sexism do not always enact aggression toward female partners, but do so in contexts relevant to their fears that women will exploit men’s relational dependence and undermine men’s power.
ArcherJ. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133–153. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3
2.
ArriagaX. B.SchkeryantzE. L. (2015). Intimate relationships and personal distress: The invisible harm of psychological aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 1332–1344. doi:10.1177/0146167215594123
3.
BornsteinR. F. (1996). The complex relationship between dependence and domestic violence. American Psychologist, 61, 595–606.
4.
BrandtM. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418. doi:10.1177/0956797611420445
5.
ChenZ.FiskeS. T.LeeT. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765–778. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9585-9
6.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
7.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.VeretteJ. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00199.x
8.
FinkelE. J.DeWallC. N.SlotterE. B.McNultyJ. K.PondR. S.JrAtkinsD. C. (2012). Using I3 theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 533–549. doi:10.1037/a0025651
9.
FinkelE. J.EckhardtC. I. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 452–474). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0020
10.
ForbesG. B.Adams-CurtisL. E.WhiteK. B. (2004). First-and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths, and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence against Women, 10, 236–261. doi:10.1177/1077801203256002
11.
ForbesG. B.JobeR. L.WhiteK. B.BloeschE.Adams-CurtisL. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexual or nonsexual betrayal of trust: Effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52, 165–173. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1292-6
12.
GellesR.StrausM. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In BurrW.HillR.NyeI.ReissI. (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research based theories (pp. 549–581). New York, NY: Free Press.
13.
GlickP.DieboldJ.Bailey-WernerB.ZhuL. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334. doi:10.1177/01461672972312009
14.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
15.
GlickP.Sakalli-UgurluN.FerreiraM. C.SouzaM. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068
16.
GottmanJ. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197.
17.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013). Men’s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of intimate partners: Fostering dissatisfaction and negative behavior in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1585–1599. doi:10.1177/0146167213499026
18.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (in press). Sexism in intimate contexts: How romantic relationships help explain the origins, functions and consequences of sexist attitudes. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HellmuthJ. C.McNultyJ. K. (2008). Neuroticism, marital violence, and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 166–180. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.166
20.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.BatesL.SmutzlerN.SandinE. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65–99.
21.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
22.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
Martinez-PecinoR.DuránM. (2016). I love you but I cyberbully you: The role of hostile sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–4. doi:10.1177/0886260516645817
25.
MurphyC. M.MeyerS. L.O’LearyK. D. (1994). Dependency characteristics of partner assaultive men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 729–735. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.4.729
26.
MurphyC. M.O’LearyK. D. (1989). Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 579–582. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.5.579
27.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
28.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639. doi:10.1037/a0012961
29.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D.McNultyJ. K.FinkelE. J. (2016). Power in context: Relationship and situational power interact to predict men’s aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217. doi:10.1037/pspi0000059
30.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2009). Attachment and dependence regulation within daily interactions with romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 16, 239–261. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01221.x
31.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2010). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Accommodation Scale: Evidence from three diary studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 299–304. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.020
32.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271–290. doi:10.1037/a0022727
33.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
34.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
35.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model. The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
36.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204. doi:10.1177/026540759301000202
37.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
38.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059
39.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
40.
SibleyC. G.PerryR. (2010). An opposing process model of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 438–452. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9705-6
41.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
42.
SlotterE. B.FinkelE. J.DeWallC. N.PondR. S.JrLambertN. M.BodenhausenG. V.FinchamF. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 291–305.
43.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88. doi:10.2307/351733
44.
YakushkoO. (2005). Ambivalent sexism and relationship patterns among women and men in Ukraine. Sex Roles, 52, 589–596. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3727-5
45.
YamawakiN.OstensonJ.BrownR. C. (2009). The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence against Women, 15, 1126–1142. doi:10.1177/1077801209340758
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
