According to previous research, threatening people’s belief in free will may undermine moral judgments and behavior. Four studies tested this claim. Study 1 used a Velten technique to threaten people’s belief in free will and found no effects on moral behavior, judgments of blame, and punishment decisions. Study 2 used six different threats to free will and failed to find effects on judgments of blame and wrongness. Study 3 found no effects on moral judgment when manipulating general free will beliefs but found strong effects when manipulating the perceived choice capacity of the judged agent. Study 4 used pretested narratives that varied agents’ apparent free will and found that perceived choice capacity mediated the relationship between free will and blame. These results suggest that people’s general beliefs about whether free will exists have no impact on moral judgments but specific judgments about the agent’s choice capacity do.
CashmoreA. R. (2010). The Lucretian swerve: The biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4499–4504. doi:10.1073/pnas.0915161107
2.
CrickF. (1995). Astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
3.
CushmanF. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
4.
DarwinC. R. (1840). Old and useless notes about the moral sense and some metaphysical points (BarrettP. H., Trans.). Retrieved fromhttp://darwinonline.org.uk/
5.
DennettD. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
GreeneJ. D.CohenJ. D. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1775–1785. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
7.
KruegerF.HoffmanM.WalterH.GrafmanJ. (2013). An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nst092
8.
LagnadoD. A.ChannonS. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108, 754–770. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.009
9.
MalleB. F.GuglielmoS.MonroeA. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 147–186. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
10.
MartinJ. W.CushmanF. (2016). Why we forgive what can’t be controlled. Cognition, 147, 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.008
11.
MonroeA. E.DillonK. D.MalleB. F. (2014). Bringing free will down to Earth: People’s psychological concept of free will and its role in moral judgment. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.011
12.
MonroeA. E.MalleB. F. (2010). From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people’s folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 211–224. doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0010-7
13.
MonroeA. E.MalleB. F. (2014). Free will without metaphysics. In MeleA. R. (Ed.), Surrounding free will (pp. 25–48). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
MontagueR. P. (2008). Free will. Current Biology, 18, R584–R585.
15.
NadelhofferT.ShepardJ.NahmiasE.SripadaC.RossL. T. (2014). The free will inventory: Measuring beliefs about agency and responsibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 27–41. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.006
16.
NahmiasE. (2011). Is neuroscience the death of free will?The New York Times. Retrieved fromhttp://nyti.ms/1cEaqZ9
17.
NahmiasE.MorrisS.NadelhofferT.TurnerJ. (2005). Surveying freedom: Folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 561–584. doi:10.1080/09515080500264180
18.
NahmiasE.ShepardJ.ReuterS. (2014). It’s OK if “my brain made me do it”: People’s intuitions about free will and neuroscientific prediction. Cognition, 133, 502–516. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.009
19.
NahmiasE.ThompsonM. (2014). A naturalistic vision of free will. In O’NeillE.MacheryE. (Eds.), Current controversies in experimental philosophy (pp. 86–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
NicholsS. (2011). Experimental philosophy and the problem of free will. Science, 331, 1401–1403. doi:10.1126/science.1192931
21.
NicholsS.KnobeJ. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous, 41, 663–685.
22.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
23.
OverbyeD. (2007, 12). Free will: Now you have it, now you don’t. The New York Times, F1.
24.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
25.
SarkissianH.ChatterjeeA.De BrigardF.KnobeJ.NicholsS.SirkerS. (2010). Is belief in free will a cultural universal?Mind & Language, 25, 346–358. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01393.x
26.
SchoolerJ.NadelhofferT.NahmiasE.VohsK. D. (2014). Measuring and manipulating beliefs and behaviors associated with free will. In MeleA. R. (Ed.), Surrounding free will: Philosophy, psychology, neuroscience (pp. 72–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
ShariffA. F.GreeneJ. D.KarremansJ. C.LuguriJ. B.ClarkC. J.SchoolerJ. W.…VohsK. D. (2014). Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science, 25, 1563–1570. doi:10.1177/0956797614534693
28.
ShariffA. F.VohsK. D. (2014). The world without free will. Scientific American, 310, 76–79. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0614-76
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.MeleA. R. (2011). Free will in everyday life: Autobiographical accounts of free and unfree actions. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 381–394. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.556607
31.
VeltenE. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4
32.
VohsK. D.SchoolerJ. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19, 49–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x
33.
WegnerD. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
WoolfolkR. L.DorisJ. M.DarleyJ. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283–301. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002
35.
YoungL.SaxeR. (2009). Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2065–2072. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.020
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
