Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Status conflicts, conflicts about members’ relative positions in a team’s status hierarchy, generally harm group performance. We integrate research on status conflicts and social information processing and find in two longitudinal survey studies that the disruptive effects of status conflicts depend on the extent to which members agree about the group’s status hierarchy. Specifically, status conflicts in teams with high-status agreement disrupt team performance by producing lower status agreement after the conflict. Status conflicts that occur in teams with low-status agreement, however, benefit performance by helping members clarify the hierarchy, leading to higher subsequent status agreement. In a third study, we examine how status conflict and status agreement interactively impact teams’ use of task-relevant cues to assign status. By contextualizing status conflicts in terms of the teams’ status agreement, we identify conditions in which the dysfunctional effects of status conflicts counterintuitively enhance team performance.

Keywords

conflict status team performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Brown

C. E.

(2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55–89. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002

Anderson

Kilduff

G. J.

(2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x

Anderson

Srivastava

Beer

Spataro

Chatman

J. A.

(2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110.

Anderson

Willer

(2014). Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. In Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Anderson

(Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 47–70). New York, NY: Springer.

Anderson

Willer

Kilduff

G. J.

Brown

C. E.

(2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088. doi:10.1037/a0027409

Anicich

E. M.

Fast

N. J.

Halevy

Galinsky

A. D.

(2016). When the bases of social hierarchy collide: Power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organization Science, 27, 123–140.

Bendersky

Hays

N. A.

(2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323–340. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0734

Bendersky

Shah

N. P.

(2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 387–406. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0316

Berger

Connor

T. L.

Fisek

M. H.

(1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

10.

Berger

Ridgeway

C. L.

Fisek

M. H.

Norman

R. Z.

(1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405. doi:10.2307/2657555

11.

Berger

Rosenholtz

S. J.

Zelditch

(1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.

12.

Bunderson

J. S.

(2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591. doi:10.2307/3556637

13.

Carson

J. B.

Tesluk

P. E.

Marrone

J. A.

(2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. doi:10.2307/20159921

14.

Chan

(1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234.

15.

Chen

Ender

P. B.

Mitchell

Wells

(2003). Regression with Stata. Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default.htm

16.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

Doty

(2013). Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 559.

17.

Farh

J.-L.

Lee

Farh

C. I.

(2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173.

18.

Faris

(2012). Aggression, exclusivity, and status attainment in Interpersonal Networks. Social Forces, 90, 1207–1235.

19.

Gallup. (2014). Congressional job approval rating. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/175676/congress-approval-sits-two-months-elections.aspx

20.

Gersick

(1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36.

21.

Greer

Van Kleef

G. A.

(2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032.

22.

Groysberg

Polzer

J. T.

Elfenbein

H. A.

(2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness Organization Science, 22, 722–737.

23.

Hays

Bendersky

(2015). Not at all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 867–882.

24.

Henry

P. J.

(2009). Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 451–466.

25.

James

Demaree

Wolf

(1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.69.1.85

26.

Kilduff

G. J.

Willer

Anderson

(2016). Hierarchy and its discontents: Status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance. Organization Science, 27, 373–390. doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1058

27.

Klein

K. J.

Ziegert

J. C.

Knight

A. P.

Xiao

(2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 590–621.

28.

Loch

C. H.

Huberman

B. A.

Stout

(2000). Status competition and performance in work groups. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 35–55.

29.

Magee

J. C.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.1080/19416520802211628

30.

Martorana

Galinsky

A. D.

Rao

(2005). From system justification to system condemnation: Antecedents of attempts to change power hierarchies. In Thomas-Hunt

M. C.

(Ed.), Status and groups (Vol. 7, pp. 285–315). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

31.

McGrath

J. E.

(1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147–174.

32.

Overbeck

J. R.

Correll

Park

(2005). Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. In Thomas-Hunt

M. C.

Mannix

E. A.

Neale

M. A.

(Eds.), Research on managing groups & teams (Vol. 7, pp. 169–199). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

33.

Owens

D. A.

Sutton

R. I.

(2001). Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. In Turner

M. E.

(Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 299–316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

Pettit

N. C.

Sivanathan

Gladstone

Marr

J. C.

(2013). Rising stars and sinking ships: Consequences of status momentum. Psychological Science, 24, 1579–1584. doi:10.1177/0956797612473120

35.

Pettit

N. C.

Yong

Spataro

S. E.

(2010). Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 396–401. doi:10.1016/J.Jesp.2009.12.007

36.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Organ

D. W.

(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.

37.

Roy

D. F.

(1959). Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18, 158–168.

38.

Strauss

Schatzman

Bucher

Ehrlich

Sabshin

(1963). The hospital and its negotiated order. In Friedson

(Ed.), Hospital in modern society (pp. 147–169). New York, NY: Free Press.

39.

Sutton

R. I.

Hargadon

(1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685–718. doi:10.2307/2393872

40.

Tiedens

L. Z.

Unzueta

M. M.

Young

M. J.

(2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 402–414. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.402

41.

Tost

L. P.

(2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36, 686–710. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0227

42.

Tsai

Bendersky

(2016). The pursuit of information sharing: Expressing task conflicts as debates versus disagreements increases perceived receptivity to dissenting opinions in groups. Organization Science, 27, 141–156.

43.

Tyler

T. R.

Blader

S. L.

(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07

44.

Walker

H. A.

Thomas

G. M.

Zelditch

(1986). Legitimation, endorsement, and stability. Social Forces, 64, 620–643. doi:10.2307/2578816

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

The Positive Effects of Status Conflicts in Teams Where Members Perceive Status Hierarchies Differently

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material