We examined how adopting a future (vs. present)-oriented perspective when reflecting on a relationship conflict impacts the process of reasoning and relationship well-being. Across two studies, participants instructed to think about how they would feel in the future (vs. present) expressed more adaptive reasoning over a relationship conflict—low partner blame, greater insight, and greater forgiveness, which was then associated with greater relationship well-being—for example, more positive versus negative emotions about the relationship and expectations that the relationship will grow. These findings were driven by a decrease in person-centered language when reflecting on the conflict. Implications for understanding how temporal distance and reasoning impact relationship conflict management are discussed.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.
2.
Bruehlman-SenecalE.AydukO. (2015). This too shall pass: Temporal distance and the regulation of emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 356–375.
3.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531.
4.
CarusoE. M. (2010). When the future feels worse than the past: A temporal inconsistency in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 610–624.
5.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
6.
DeWallC. N.PondR. S.JrCampbellW. K.TwengeJ. M. (2011). Tuning in to psychological change: Linguistic markers of psychological traits and emotions over time in popular US song lyrics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 200–207.
7.
EllisD. G.HamiltonM. (1985). Syntactic and pragmatic code usage in interpersonal communication. Communications Monographs, 52, 264–279.
8.
EllsworthP. C. (1994). Levels of thought and levels of emotion. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. Series in affective science (pp. 192–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
EyalT.LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
11.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277.
12.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.
13.
FinkelE. J.SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B.WaltonG. M.GrossJ. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24, 1595–1601.
14.
GilbertD. T.GillM. J.WilsonT. D. (2002). The future is now: Temporal correction in affective forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 430–444.
15.
GilbertD. T.MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
16.
GongH.MedinD. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 628–638.
17.
GottmanJ. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197.
18.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.
19.
GrossJ. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.
20.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.
21.
GrossmannI.EllsworthP. C.HongY.-y. (2012). Culture, attention, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 31–36.
22.
GrossmannI.GerlachT. M.DenissenJ. J. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550616652206
23.
GrossmannI.KrossE. (2010). The impact of culture on adaptive vs. maladaptive self-reflection. Psychological Science, 21, 1150–1157.
24.
GrossmannI.KrossE. (2014). Exploring “Solomon’s paradox”: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relations in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 1571–1580.
25.
HallgrenK. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23–34.
26.
HeaveyC. L.ChristensenA.MalamuthN. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 797–801.
27.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
28.
KrossE.AydukO. (2011). Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 187–191.
29.
KyungE. J.MenonG.TropeY. (2010). Reconstruction of things past: Why do some memories feel so close and others so far away?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 217–220.
30.
McNultyJ. K. (2008). Forgiveness in marriage: Putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 171–175.
31.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.FilloJ. (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 730–749.
32.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.
33.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.
34.
PaulE. L.McManusB.HayesA. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.
35.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71, 2001.
36.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
37.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
38.
SeiderB. H.HirschbergerG.NelsonK. L.LevensonR. W. (2009). We can work it out: Age differences in relational pronouns, physiology, and behavior in marital conflict. Psychology and Aging, 24, 604–613.
39.
SoderbergC. K.CallahanS. P.KochersbergerA. O.AmitE.LedgerwoodA. (2014). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 525–548.
40.
ThompsonS. C.KelleyH. H. (1981). Judgments of responsibility for activities in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 469–477.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
43.
YovetichN. A.RusbultC. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
