Two prospective studies examine how wise reasoning about an anticipated conflict interaction—intellectual humility, recognition of uncertainty and change, consideration and integration of different perspectives—is associated with interpersonal feelings and closeness to the interaction partner after the challenging interaction. In Study 1 (N = 243) and preregistered replication Study 2 (N = 234), participants who reasoned more wisely before an anticipated conflict interaction felt more positively toward and closer to the person involved in the conflict afterward. We explored three avenues accompanying effects of wise reasoning about the future for interpersonal outcomes: conflict outcome, perception of the interaction as fair and satisfying, and sense of meaning in the conflict experience. Path models indicated that sense of meaning was a consistent factor accounting for the positive effect of prospective wise reasoning for relational well-being. We discuss implications for research on prospection, wisdom, and well-being.
ArriagaX. B.RusbultC. E. (1998). Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 927–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298249002
2.
BaltesP. B.KunzmannU. (2004). The two faces of wisdom: Wisdom as a general theory of knowledge and judgment about excellence in mind and virtue vs. wisdom as everyday realization in people and products. Human Development, 47, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079156
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
5.
BangenK. J.MeeksT. W.JesteD. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020
6.
BrienzaJ. P.GrossmannI. (2017). Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1870
7.
BrienzaJ. P.KungF.SantosH.BobocelD.GrossmannI. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000171
8.
BurnsZ. C.CarusoE. M.BartelsD. M. (2012). Predicting premeditation: Future behavior is seen as more intentional than past behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024861
9.
CaouetteJ.WohlM. J.PeetzJ. (2012). The future weighs heavier than the past: Collective guilt, perceived control and the influence of time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1857
10.
CarusoE. M.GilbertD. T.WilsonT. D. (2008). A wrinkle in time: Asymmetric valuation of past and future events. Psychological Science, 19(8), 796–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02159.x
11.
ChurchillA. C.DavisC. G. (2010). Realistic orientation and the transition to motherhood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.39
12.
DarnellC.GullifordL.KristjánssonK.ParisP. (2019). Phronesis and the knowledge-action gap in moral psychology and moral education: A new synthesis?Human Development, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496136
13.
DavisC. G.Nolen-HoeksemaS.LarsonJ. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.561
14.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective-taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
15.
FinkelE. J.SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B.WaltonG. M.GrossJ. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1595–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612474938
16.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
17.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
18.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/353438
GrossmannI.GerlachT. M.DenissenJ. J. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616652206
22.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560
23.
GrossmannI.OakesH.SantosH. C. (2019). Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000543
24.
GrossmannI.WeststrateN. M.ArdeltM.BrienzaJ. P.DongM.FerrariM.FournierM. A.HuC. S.NusbaumH. C.VervaekeJ. (2020). Wisdom science in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917
25.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
26.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.
27.
JacksonL. M.PancerS. M.PrattM. W.HunsbergerB. E. (2000). Great expectations: The relation between expectancies and adjustment during the transition to university. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(10), 2100–2125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02427.x
28.
JesteD. V.ArdeltM.BlazerD.KraemerH. C.VaillantG.MeeksT. W. (2010). Expert consensus on characteristics of wisdom: A Delphi method study. The Gerontologist, 50, 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq022
29.
KaneJ.Van BovenL.McGrawA. P. (2012). Prototypical prospection: Future events are more prototypically represented and simulated than past events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1866
30.
KimmesJ. G.DurtschiJ. A. (2016). Forgiveness in romantic relationships: The roles of attachment, empathy, and attributions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12171
31.
KingL. A.HicksJ. A. (2009). Detecting and constructing meaning in life events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992316
32.
KrossE.AydukO.MischelW. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x
33.
LaursenB. (1995). Conflict and social interaction in adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0501_3
34.
LaursenB.HafenC. A. (2010). Future directions in the study of close relationships: Conflict is bad (except when it’s not). Social Development, 19(4), 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00546.x
35.
McFarlinD. B.SweeneyP. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.2307/256489
36.
McGonagleK. A.KesslerR. C.SchillingE. A. (1992). The frequency and determinants of marital disagreements in a community sample. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592094003
NelsonB. W.LaurentS. M.BernsteinR.LaurentH. K. (2017). Perspective-taking influences autonomic attunement between partners during discussion of conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515626595
39.
OakesH.BrienzaJ.ElnakouriA.GrossmannI. (2018). Wise reasoning: Converging evidence for the psychology of sound judgment. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9qvtk
40.
OettingenG.MayerD. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1198–1212. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1198
41.
OverallN. C.McNultyJ. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships?Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002
42.
PancerS. M.PrattM.HunsbergerB.GallantM. (2000). Thinking ahead: Complexity of expectations and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality, 68(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00097
43.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
44.
RakoczyH.WandtR.ThomasS.NowakJ.KunzmannU. (2018). Theory of mind and wisdom: The development of different forms of perspective-taking in late adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 109(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12246
45.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
46.
SamiosC.HensonD. F.SimpsonH. J. (2014). Benefit finding and psychological adjustment following a non-marital relationship breakup. Journal of Relationships Research, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2014.6
47.
SassenrathC.HodgesS. D.PfattheicherS. (2016). It’s all about the self: When perspective taking backfires. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416659253
48.
SeligmanM. E.RailtonP.BaumeisterR. F.SripadaC. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612474317
Taylor-CarterM. A.CookK.WeinbergC. (1997). Planning and expectations of the retirement experience. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 23(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127970230306
51.
ThibautJ. W.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233
53.
Van ErpK. J.GiebelsE.Van Der ZeeK. I.Van DuijnM. A. (2011). Expatriate adjustment: The role of justice and conflict in intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01312.x
54.
WeststrateN. M.GlückJ. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: Exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000286
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
