How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people’s reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others’ perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.
AldaoA.Nolen-HoeksemaS.SchweizerS. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Reviewsychology Review, 30, 217–237. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004
2.
AquinasT.AlbertusM.HouserR. E.PhilipC. (2004). The cardinal virtues: Aquinas, Albert, and Philip the chancellor. Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Aristotle. (1953). Ethics: The Nicomachean ethics. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
5.
AydukÖ.KrossE. (2010). From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 809–829. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019205
6.
BaltesP. B.KunzmannU. (2004). The two faces of wisdom: Wisdom as a general theory of knowledge and judgment about excellence in mind and virtue vs. Wisdom as everyday realization in people and products. Human Development, 47, 290–299. doi:http://doi.org/10.1159/000079156
7.
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: Its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 56–64. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x
8.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. The American Psychologist, 55, 122–136. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.122
9.
BassechesM. (1980). Dialectical schemata: A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Human Development, 23, 400–421.
10.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
11.
BirrenJ. E.SvenssonC. M. (2005). Wisdom in History. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), A Handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
13.
BleidornW. (2009). Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality, 23, 509–530. doi:http://doi.org/10.1002/per.731
14.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
15.
BrownB. (1938). The wisdom of the Chinese: Their philosophy in sayings and in proverbs. Garden City, NY: Garden City.
16.
ClaytonV. P. (1982). Wisdom and intelligence: The nature and function of knowledge in the later years. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15, 315–321.
17.
DenissenJ. J. A.GeenenR.SelfhoutM.van AkenM. A. G. (2008). Single-item big five ratings in a social network design. European Journal of Personality, 22, 37–54. doi:http://doi.org/10.1002/per.662
18.
DorisJ. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DunningD.HeathC.SulsJ. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
20.
DweckC. S.MangelsJ. A.GoodC. (2004). Motivational effects on attention, cognition, and performance. In DaiD. Y.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 41–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H.DavilaJ. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 72.
22.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
23.
FleesonW. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x
24.
FleesonW.NoftleE. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00122.x
25.
FleesonW.NoftleE. (2012). Personality research. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in studying daily life (pp. 525–538). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
FraleyR. C.MarksM. J. (2007). The null hypothesis significance-testing ebate and its implications for personality research. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
FunderD. C. (2008). Persons, situations, and person-situation interactions. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 568–580). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
28.
GandhiM.AttenboroughR. (1982). The words of Gandhi. New York, NY: New Market Press.
29.
GlückJ.KönigS.NaschenwengK.RedzanowskiU.Dorner-HörigL.StrasserI.…WiedermannW. (2013). How to measure wisdom: Content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405
30.
GrossmannI.HuynhA. C.EllsworthP. C. (2015). Emotional complexity: Clarifying definitions and cultural correlates. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology. doi:http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000084
31.
GrossmannI.KarasawaM.IzumiS.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2012). Aging and wisdom: Culture matters. Psychological Science, 23, 1059–1066. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446025
32.
GrossmannI.KrossE. (2010). The impact of culture on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection. Psychological Science, 21, 1150–1157. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376655
33.
GrossmannI.KrossE. (2014). Exploring “Solomon’s paradox”: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relations in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 1571–1580. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400
34.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 944–953. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560
35.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.ParkD. C.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 7246–7250.
36.
GrossmannI.SahdraB.CiarrochiJ. (2016). A heart and a mind: Self-distancing facilitates the association between heart rate variability and wise reasoning. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10. doi:http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00068
37.
HellerD.KomarJ.LeeW. B. (2007). The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 898–910. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301010
38.
HollidayS. G.ChandlerM. J. (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Contributions to human development (Vol. 17). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
39.
HonakerJ.KingG.BlackwellM. (2011). Amelia II: A program for mising data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–47.
40.
HumphreysS. (1961). The wisdom of Buddhism. New York, NY: Random House.
41.
InhelderB.PiagetJ. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
42.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big give trait taxonomy. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KekesJ. (1995). Moral wisdom and good lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
44.
KihlstromJ. F.EichE.SandbrandD.TobiasB. A. (2000). Emotion and memory: Implications for self-report (with a critique of retrospective analyses). In StoneA. A.TurkhanJ. S.BachrachC.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S.CainV. S. (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 81–99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
KramerD. A. (1989). Development of an awareness of contradiction across the life span and the question of postformal operations. Adult Development, 1, 133–159.
46.
KrossE.GrossmannI. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 43–48. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024158
47.
KunzmannU.BaltesP. B. (2003). Wisdom-related knowledge: Affective, motivational, and interpersonal correlates. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1104–1119. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254506
48.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.Bojesen ChristensenR. H. (2016). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models(lmer objects of lme4 package). Retrieved fromhttp://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest
LabrooA. A.PatrickV. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 800–809. doi:http://doi.org/10.1086/593683
51.
LinY. (1994). The wisdom of confucius. New York, NY: Modern Library.
52.
McCabeK. O.FleesonW. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505. doi:http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612444904
53.
McCulloughM. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43–55.
54.
McCulloughM. E.RootL. M.CohenA. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887.
55.
NisbettR. E.AronsonJ.BlairC.DickensW.FlynnJ.HalpernD. F.TurkheimerE. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130.
56.
OrwollL.PerlmutterM. (1990). The study of wise persons: Integrating a personality perspective. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (p. 160). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
ParkJ.AydukÖ.KrossE. (2016). Stepping back to move forward: Expressive writing promotes self-distancing. Emotion, 16, 349–364. doi:http://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000121
58.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2008). The cultivation of character strengths. In FerrariM.PotworowskiG. (Eds.), Teaching for Wisdom (pp. 59–77). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
59.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
60.
QuoidbachJ.GruberJ.MikolajczakM.KoganA.KotsouI.NortonM. I. (2014). Emodiversity and the emotional ecosystem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2057–2066.
61.
RedzanowskiU.GlückJ. (2013). Who knows who is wise? Self and peer ratings of wisdom. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 391–394. doi:http://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs079
62.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan—An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
63.
RothM.DeckerO.HerzbergP. Y.BrählerE. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 190–197. doi:http://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.190
64.
SchwarzN.KahnemanD.XuJ. (2009). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In BelliR.AlwinD.StaffordF. (Eds.), Calendar and time diary: Methods in life events research (pp. 157–174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65.
StaudingerU. M.BaltesP. B. (1996). Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 746–762.
66.
StaudingerU. M.GlückJ. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241. doi:http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659
67.
StaudingerU. M.LopezD.BaltesP. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1200–1214.
68.
SternbergR. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.
69.
TaylorM.BatesG.WebsterJ. D. (2011). Comparing the psychometric properties of two measures of wisdom: Predicting forgiveness and psychological well-being with the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS). Experimental Aging Research, 37, 129–141. doi:http://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2011.554508
70.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Ohio State University series on attitudes and persuasion (pp. 361–386). Hillsdal, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
TiberiusV. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely with our limits. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
72.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 605–620. doi:http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x
73.
WebsterJ. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 13–22.
74.
WebsterJ. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65, 163–183. doi:http://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.2.d
75.
WorthingtonE. L.SchererM. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology & Health, 19, 385–405. doi:http://doi.org/10.1080/0887044042000196674
76.
ZacherH.McKennaB.RooneyD. (2012). Effects of self-reported wisdom on happiness: Not much more than emotional intelligence?Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1697–1716. doi:http://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9404-9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
