Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Do psychologically adjusted individuals know what other people think about them? Participants rated their own personality and levels of intrapersonal and interpersonal adjustment and also estimated how a new acquaintance and friends perceived them on core personality traits. These individuals rated the participant’s personality and friends described participants’ adjustment. Intrapersonally and interpersonally adjusted individuals were aware of the positive rather than the distinctive and potentially negative impressions they made, although people who were interpersonally adjusted (e.g., socially skilled) had insight into what made them distinctive in their friends’ eyes. Psychologically adjusted individuals also tended to overestimate their transparency, meaning they assumed others saw them as they saw themselves more so than others actually did. Interestingly, effects depended somewhat on who reported on adjustment, such that friend-reported adjustment was linked to accuracy, whereas self-reported adjustment was linked to transparency. Implications for the adaptiveness of accuracy are discussed.

Keywords

self-knowledge interpersonal perception well-being personality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

R. A.

Ledermann

Kenny

D. A.

(2016). Power analysis for the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from https://robert-ackerman.shinyapps.io/APIMPowerR/

Bates

Sarkar

(2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.9975-12) [Computer software]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Biesanz

J. C.

(2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853–885.

Campbell

J. D.

Fehr

(1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122–133.

Campbell

Lackenbauer

S. D.

Muise

(2006). When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self-perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner’s verifying and enhancing appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1283–1294.

Carlson

E. N.

DesJardins

N. M. L.

(2015). Do mean guys always finish first or just say that they do? Narcissists’ awareness of their social status and popularity over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167215581712

Carlson

E. N.

Furr

R. M.

(2009). Differential meta-accuracy: People understand the different impressions they make. Psychological Science, 20, 1033–1039.

Carlson

E. N.

Furr

R. M.

(2013). Resolution for meta-accuracy: Should people trust their beliefs about how others see them? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 419–426.

10.

Carlson

E. N.

Furr

R. M.

Vazire

(2010). Do we know the first impressions we make? Evidence for idiographic meta-accuracy and calibration of first impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 94–98.

11.

Carlson

E. N.

Oltmanns

T. F.

(2015). The role of metaperception in personality disorders: Do people with personality problems know how others experience their personality? Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 449–467.

12.

Carlson

E. N.

Vazire

Furr

R. M.

(2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 831–846.

13.

Carlson

E. N.

Vazire

Oltmanns

T. F.

(2013). Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 81, 155–170.

14.

Christensen

P. N.

Stein

M. B.

Means-Christensen

(2003). Social anxiety and interpersonal perception: A social relations model analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1355–1371.

15.

Church

A. T.

Katigbak

M. S.

Mazuera Arias

Rincon

B. C.

Vargas-Flores

J. D. J.

Ibáñez-Reyes

… Ortiz

F. A.

(2014). A four-culture study of self-enhancement and adjustment using the social relations model: Do alternative conceptualizations and indices make a difference? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 997–1014. doi:10.1037/a0036491

16.

Colvin

C. R.

Block

Funder

D. C.

(1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152–1162.

17.

Edwards

A. L.

(1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.

18.

Fletcher

G. J. O.

Kerr

P. S. G.

(2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658.

19.

Furr

R. M.

(2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316.

20.

Gallrein

M. B.

Carlson

E. N.

Holstein

Leising

(2013). You spy with your little eye: People are “blind” to some of the ways in which they are consensually seen by others. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 464–471.

21.

Human

L. J.

Biesanz

J. C.

(2011). Through the looking glass clearly: Accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals’ first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 349–364.

22.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.

23.

Kenny

D. A.

DePaulo

B. M.

(1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.145

24.

Kurt

Paulhus

D. L.

(2008). Moderators of the adaptiveness of self-enhancement: Operationalization, motivational domain, adjustment facet, and evaluator. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 839–853.

25.

Leary

M. R.

Tambor

E. S.

Terdal

S. K.

Downs

D. L.

(1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.

26.

Leising

Erbs

Fritz

(2010). The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 668–682.

27.

Lemay

E. P.

Dudley

K. L.

(2009). Implications of reflected appraisals of interpersonal insecurity for suspicion and power. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1672–1686. doi:10.1177/0146167209348380

28.

Letzring

T. D.

Noftle

E. E.

(2010). Predicting relationship quality from self-verification of broad personality traits among romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 353–362.

29.

Lorenzo

G. L.

Biesanz

J. C.

Human

L. J.

(2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood. Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21, 1777–1782.

30.

Mosterman

R. M.

Hendriks

A. A. J.

(2011). Self-other disagreement in personality assessment: Significance and prognostic value. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 159–171.

31.

Murray

S. L.

Holmes

J. G.

Bellavia

Griffin

D. W.

Dolderman

(2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563

32.

Murray

S. L.

Holmes

J. G.

MacDonald

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459–1480.

33.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208.

34.

Schlenker

B. R.

Weigold

M. F.

(1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133–168.

35.

Scherbaum

C. A.

Ferreter

J. M.

(2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367.

36.

Srivastava

Beer

J. S.

(2005). How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 966–977.

37.

Swann

W. B.

Stein-Seroussi

Giesler

R. B.

(1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 392–401.

38.

Taylor

S. E.

Brown

J. D.

(1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

39.

Tenney

E. R.

Vazire

Mehl

M. R.

(2013). This examined life: The upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships. PloS One, 8, e69605.

40.

Vazire

(2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 472–481.

41.

Vazire

(2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.

42.

Ward

Brenner

(2006). Accentuate the negative: The positive effects of negative acknowledgement. Psychological Science, 17, 959–962.

43.

Weger

(2005). Disconfirming communication and self-verification in marriage: Associations among the demand/withdraw interaction pattern, feeling understood, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 19–31.

44.

Wojcik

S. P.

Ditto

P. H.

(2014). Motivated happiness: Self-enhancement inflates self-reported subjective well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 825–834.

45.

Wood

Furr

R. M.

(2015). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi:10.1177/1088868315581119

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Do Psychologically Adjusted Individuals Know What Other People Really Think About Them? The Link Between Psychological Adjustment and Meta-Accuracy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material