Forming accurate perceptions is often linked to positive relationship and individual functioning, yet may also be detrimental in some contexts. The current study examined whether accuracy may be detrimental to individual functioning, both psychological and physiological, in an important social context: parent–adolescent relationships. Specifically, we examined whether the accuracy of adolescents’ perceptions of their parent’s behaviors was associated with adolescent psychological adjustment (depression and perceived stress; Ndyads = 99) and proinflammatory profiles (Ndyads = 95). Adolescents who viewed their parent’s behaviors more accurately (more in line with external observers’ ratings) reported worse psychological adjustment and demonstrated worse regulation of the inflammatory response. In contrast, adolescents who viewed their parent’s behaviors highly normatively and positively reported better psychological adjustment. Overall, these findings suggest that adolescent accuracy regarding parent behaviors may be detrimental to adolescent psychological adjustment and inflammatory processes.
AllenN. B.BadcockP. B. T. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 887–913.
2.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In AlloyL. B. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 223–265). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
AmbadyN.GrayH. M. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 947–961.
4.
BatesD.SarkarD. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.9975-12. Retrieved fromhttp://cran.r-project.org.
5.
BernieriF. J. (2001). Towards a taxonomy of interpersonal sensitivity. In HallJ. A.BernieriF. J. (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BiesanzJ. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853–885. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.519262
7.
BiesanzJ. C.HumanL. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: Accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal. Psychological Science, 21, 589–594. doi:10.1177/0956797610364121
8.
BorkenauP.ZaltauskasK. (2009). Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. European Journal of Personality, 23, 107–123. doi:10.1002/per.707
9.
ChaikenS.LibermanA.EaglyA. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
ChowdhuryF.WilliamsA.JohnsonP. (2009). Validation and comparison of two multiplex technologies, luminex and mesoscale discovery, for human cytokine profiling. Journal of Immunological Methods, 340, 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2008.10.002
11.
ChungH. Y.CesariM.AntonS.MarzettiE.GiovanniniS.SeoA. Y.…LeeuwenburghC. (2009). Molecular inflammation: Underpinnings of aging and age-related diseases. Ageing Research Reviews, 8, 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2008.07.002
12.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404
13.
CronbachL. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 177–193. doi:10.1037/h0044919
14.
EdwardsA. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York, NY: Dryden.
15.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658.
16.
ForgasJ. P.BowerG. H. (1987). Mood effects on person perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 53–60.
17.
FriesE.HesseJ.HellhammerJ.HellhammerD. H. (2005). A new view on hypocortisolism. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 1010–1016. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.04.006
18.
FuligniA. J.TelzerE. H.BowerJ.ColeS. W.KiangL.IrwinM. R. (2009). A preliminary study of daily interpersonal stress and C-reactive protein levels among adolescents from Latin American and European backgrounds. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 329–333. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181921b1f
19.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521
20.
GagneF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322–338. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1
21.
GelmanA. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865–2873. doi:10.1002/sim.3107
22.
GottmanJ. M.KatzL. F. (1989). Effects of marital discord on young children’s peer interaction and health. Developmental Psychology, 25, 373–381. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.373
23.
HallJ. A.AndrzejewskiS. A.YopchickJ. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 149–180. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0070-5
24.
HaugenP. T.WelshD. P.McNultyJ. K. (2008). Empathic accuracy and adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 709–727.
25.
HumanL. J.BiesanzJ. C. (2011). Through the looking glass clearly: Accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals’ first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 349–364. doi:10.1037/a0021850
26.
HumanL. J.BiesanzJ. C. (2012). Accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions of personality: Differing associations at different levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 106–110. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.002
HumanL. J.SandstromG. M.BiesanzJ. C.DunnE. W. (2013). Accurate first impressions leave a lasting impression: The long-term effects of distinctive self-other agreement on relationship development. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 395–402. doi:10.1177/1948550612463735
29.
IckesW.SimpsonJ. A. (1997). Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218–250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
KaplanM. F. (1968). Elicitation of information and response biases of repressors, sensitizers, and neutrals in behavior prediction. Journal of Personality, 36, 84–91.
31.
LackenbauerS. D.CampbellL.RubinH.FletcherG. J. O.TroisterT. (2010). The unique and combined benefits of accuracy and positive bias in relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 475–493. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01282.x
32.
LewinsohnP. M.MischelW.ChaplinW.BartonR. (1980). Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perception. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 203–212.
33.
LuoS.SniderA. (2009). Accuracy and biases in newlyweds’ perceptions of each other: Not mutually exclusive but mutually beneficial. Psychological Science, 20, 1332–1339.
34.
ManczakE.McLeanK. C.McAdamsD. P.ChenE. (2015). Physiological reactivity during parent-adolescent discussions: Associations with scaffolding behaviors and relationship quality. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 522–531. doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9680-1
35.
MartinM. T.Miller-JohnsonS.KitzmannK. M.EmeryR. E. (1998). Parent–child relationships and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Observational ratings of clinically relevant dimensions. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 102–111. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.12.1.102
36.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587–604. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017479
37.
MillerG. E.ChenE. (2010). Harsh family climate in early life presages the emergence of a proinflammatory phenotype in adolescence. Psychological Science, 21, 848–856. doi:10.1177/0956797610370161
38.
MillerG. E.ChenE.ParkerK. J. (2011). Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: Moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 959–997. doi:10.1037/a0024768
39.
MillerG. E.ChenE.ZhouE. S. (2007). If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis in humans. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 25–45.
40.
MillerG. E.GaudinA.ZyskE.ChenE. (2009). Parental support and cytokine activity in childhood asthma: The role of glucocorticoid sensitivity. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 123, 824–830. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.019
41.
MillerG. E.RohlederN.ColeS. W. (2009). Chronic interpersonal stress predicts activation of pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways 6 months later. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 57–62. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318190d7de
42.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480–497. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.480
45.
NeubergS. L.FiskeS. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431
46.
O’ConnorM. F.BowerJ. E.ChoH. J.CreswellJ. D.DimitrovS.HambyM. E.…IrwinM. R. (2009). To assess, to control, to exclude: Effects of biobehavioral factors on circulating inflammatory markers. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 23, 887–897. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2009.04.005
47.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D. (2012). Biased and accurate: Depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 636–650.
48.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
49.
RepettiR. L.TaylorS. E.SeemanT. E. (2002). Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330–366. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.230
50.
SanbonmatsuD. M.UchinoB. N.BirminghamW. (2011). On the importance of knowing your partner’s views: Attitude familiarity is associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower ambulatory blood pressure in daily life. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41, 131–137.
51.
SchwarzN.BlessH. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55–71). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
52.
SillarsA. L.PikeG. R.JonesT. S.MurphyM. A. (1984). Communication and understanding in marriage. Human Communication Research, 10, 317–350.
53.
SillarsA. L.ScottM. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates: An integrative review. Human Communication Research, 10, 153–176.
54.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.BlackstoneT. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 629–641.
55.
SimpsonJ. A.OrinaM. M.IckesW. (2003). When accuracy hurts and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.
56.
SlatcherR. B.RoblesT. F. (2012). Preschoolers’ everyday conflict at home and diurnal cortisol patterns. Health Psychology, 31, 834–838. doi:10.1037/a0026774
57.
TaylorS. E. (2010). Mechanisms linking early life stress to adult health outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8507–8512. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003890107
58.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
59.
ToedterG.HaydenK.WagnerC.BrodmerkelC. (2008). Simultaneous detection of eight analytes in human serum by two commercially available platforms for multiplex cytokine analysis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 15, 42–48. doi:10.1128/CVI.00211-07
60.
UchinoB. M.SanbonmatsuD. M.BirminghamW. (2013). Knowing your partner is not enough: Spousal importance moderates the link between attitude familiarity and ambulatory blood pressure. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36, 549–555. doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9437-x
61.
UrbanowskaT.MangialaioS.ZicklerC.CheevaprukS.HaslerP.RegenassS.LegayF. (2006). Protein microarray platform for the multiplex analysis of biomarkers in human sera. Journal of Immunological Methods, 316, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2006.03.019
62.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300. doi:10.1037/a0013314
63.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357–378.
64.
WickramaK. A.LorenzF. O.CongerR. D. (1997). Parental support and adolescent physical health status: A latent growth-curve analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 149–163. doi:10.2307/2955422
65.
WolfJ. M.MillerG. E.ChenE. (2008). Parent psychological states predict changes in inflammatory markers in children with asthma and healthy children. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 22, 433–441. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2007.10.016
66.
WoodD.FurrR. M. (2016). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 79–99. doi:10.1177/1088868315581119
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
