Are hiring decisions affected by knowledge that a job applicant was previously laid off? We expected decisional biases to be linked with the motivational tendency to believe that society is fair and outcomes are just and deserved (hereafter, system justifying beliefs [SJBs]). Indeed, hiring decisions were more likely to disadvantage a laid off applicant as SJBs increased both when detailed job application information was reviewed for one laid off applicant (Study 1) and when the applicant was described as one of many laid off as the result of corporate downsizing (Study 2). Furthermore, both experiments supported a mediation model, whereby greater endorsement of SJBs was associated with greater perceptions of weaknesses in the laid off applicant, which in turn led to less sympathy, and finally to biased hiring decisions. Study 2 additionally demonstrated that all findings held when controlling for other ideologies.
AltmeyerR. A. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–91.
2.
BrocknerJ.GroverS.ReedT.DeWittR.O’MalleyM. (1987). Survivors’ reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526–541.
3.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Mass layoff statistics: Movement of work[Data file]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bls.gov/mls/mowmain.htm
4.
CokeJ. S.BatsonC. D.McDavisK. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766.
5.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894.
6.
FeyginaI.JostJ. T.GoldsmithR. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338.
7.
FlanaganD. J.O’ShaughnessyK. C. (2005). The effect of layoffs on firm reputation. Journal of Management, 31, 445–463.
8.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
9.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
GreenbaumR. L.FolgerR.FordR. (2011). Moral contracts. In GillandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics (pp. 199–221). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
11.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
12.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
13.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
14.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 111–153). Hove, England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
15.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.
16.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.SullivanB. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.
17.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
18.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP. S.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1423–1536.
19.
KarrenR.ShermanK. (2012). Layoffs and unemployment discrimination: A new stigma. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 848–863.
20.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.
21.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823.
22.
KayA. C.JostJ. T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 15, 240–246.
KivimakiM.VahteraJ.PenttiJ.FerrieJ. E. (2000). Factors underlying the effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees: Longitudinal cohort study. British Medical Journal, 320, 971–975.
25.
LernerM. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
26.
LernerM. J.MillerD. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.
27.
LipkusI. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global Belief in a Just World Scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional Belief in a Just World Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.
30.
OldmeadowJ.FiskeS. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status competence stereotypes: Roles for Belief in a Just World and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.
31.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172.
34.
SidaniusJ.Van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS. (2003). Social hierarchy maintenance and assortment into social roles: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 27–44.
35.
WagarT. H. (2001). Consequences of work force reduction: Some employer and union evidence. Journal of Labor Research, 22, 851–862.
36.
WalsterE.WalsterG. W.BercheidE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
WilsonG.McBrierD. B. (2005). Race and loss of privilege: African American/White differences in the determinants of job layoffs from upper-tier occupations. Sociological Forum, 20, 301–321.
39.
ZakrissonI. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872.
