This research examined the relationship between endorsing system-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being among individuals fromethnic groups that vary in social status. Systemjustifying beliefs are beliefs that imply that status in society is fair, deserved, and merited; examples of system-justifying beliefs in the United States include the beliefs that hard work pays off and that anyone can get ahead regardless of their group membership. We found that endorsing system-justifying beliefs was negatively related to psychological well-being among members of lowstatus groups who were highly identified with their group but positively related to well-being among members of low-status groups who were not highly identified with their ethnic group. In addition, we found that endorsing system-justifying beliefs was positively related to well-being among members of high-status groups, especially among members of high-status groups who were highly identified with the group.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
3.
Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans’ implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61-87.
4.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114.
5.
Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951-972.
6.
Bonanno, G., Wortman, C. B., Lehman, D. R., Tweed, R. G., Haring, M., Sonnega, J., et al. (2002). Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 1150-1164.
7.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
8.
Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11, 399-402.
9.
Crandall, C. S., & Martinez, R. (1996). Culture, ideology, and antifat attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1165-1176.
10.
Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
11.
Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum.
12.
DeNavas-Walt, C., Cleveland, R., & Webster, B. H. (2003). Income in the United States: 2002(U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-221). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13.
Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) administration, scoring and proceduresmanual(3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
14.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
15.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P.,& Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow fromperceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
16.
Furnham, F. (1990). A content, correlational, and factor analytic study of seven questionnaire measures of the Protestant Work Ethic. Human Relations, 43, 383-399.
17.
Furnham, A., & Proctor, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365-384.
18.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
19.
Jost, J. T., Burgess, D.,& Mosso, C. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relationships(pp. 363-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
21.
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
22.
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
23.
Kleugel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ view of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NJ: Aldine de Gruyer.
24.
Lambert, A. J., Burroughs, T., & Nguyen, T. (1999). Perceptions of risk and the buffering hypothesis: The role of just world beliefs and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 643-656.
25.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
26.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
27.
Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Seigler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666-677.
28.
Luhtanen, R.,& Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Selfevaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
29.
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). From prejudice to intergroup relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.
30.
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and groupmembership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
Major, B., Gramzow, R., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and status legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.
32.
Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421.
33.
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(pp. 251-330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005-1017.
35.
Mirels, H. L., & Darland, D. M. (1990). The Protestant ethic and selfcharacterization. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 895-898.
36.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding(pp. 181-209). London: Academic Press.
37.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration Web site. Group Dynamics, 6, 101-115.
38.
O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. N. (2005). Group status and entitlement: The role of system-justifying beliefs. Unpublished manuscript.
39.
Overbeck, J. R., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C. O., & Flizik, A. (2004). Resistant versus acquiescent responses to ingroup inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 35-54.
40.
Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality& Social Psychology, 77, 402-414.
41.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Rosenbloom, S. R., & Way, N. (2004). Experiences of discrimination among African American, Asian American, Latino adolescents in an urban high school. Youth & Society, 35, 420-451.
43.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. In P. Sniderman& P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and race in America today. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Son Hing, L. S., Winnie, L., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 71-78.
46.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel& W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
47.
Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality& Social Psychology, 67, 732-740.
48.
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
49.
United States House of Representatives. (2005) House press gallery. Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://www.house.gov/daily/hpg.htm.
50.
United States Senate. (2005). Minorities in the senate. Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/minority_senators.htm
51.
University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). (2004). 2003-04 Campus Profile. Santa Barbara, CA: Author.
52.
Wilson, T. C. (1996). Cohort and prejudice: Whites’ attitudes toward Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 253-274.
