The attachment and sexual systems operate jointly across partners to affect relationship outcomes. In the present longitudinal investigation of newly dating couples, we tested a dual deactivation hypothesis of relationship dissatisfaction. According to this hypothesis, individuals whose sexual system is chronically deactivated are expected to experience low relationship satisfaction early in their relationships. Their satisfaction should increase with time, but only if their partners are low in attachment avoidance. Newly dating couples (2–4 months; N = 62) completed three waves of individual measures of attachment and sexual deactivation and relationship satisfaction in 4-month intervals. Dyadic growth curves showed that sexual deactivation was negatively associated with relationship satisfaction in the beginning of the relationship. This negative effect gradually disappeared among individuals whose partners were low in attachment avoidance, but persisted among individuals with avoidantly attached partners. These findings suggest that attachment processes can compensate for sexual difficulties.
AronA.AronE. N. (1991). Love and sexuality. In McKinneyK.SprecherS. (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 25–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.347
3.
BirnbaumG. E. (2007). Attachment orientations, sexual functioning, and relationship satisfaction in a community sample of women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 21–35. doi:10.1177/0265407507072576
4.
BirnbaumG. E. (2010). Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 245–252. doi:10.1177/0265407509360902
5.
BirnbaumG. E. (2014). Sexy building blocks: The contribution of the sexual system to attachment formation and maintenance. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 315–332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14250-018
6.
BirnbaumG. E.MikulincerM.SzepsenwolO.ShaverP. R.MizrahiM. (2014). When sex goes wrong: A behavioral systems perspective on individual differences in sexual attitudes, motives, feelings, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 822–842. doi:10.1037/a0036021
7.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MikulincerM.GillathO.OrpazA. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929
8.
BirnbaumG. E.WeisbergY. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2011). Desire under attack: Attachment orientations and the effects of relationship threat on sexual motivations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 448–468. doi:10.1177/0265407510381932
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
CarnelleyK. B.Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Optimism about love relationships: General vs specific lessons from one's personal experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 5–20. doi:10.1177/0265407592091001
12.
DavisD.ShaverP. R.VernonM. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076–1090. doi:10.1177/0146167204264794
13.
DiamondL. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173
14.
DohertyR. W.HatfieldE.ThompsonK.ChooP. (1994). Cultural and ethnic influences on love and attachment. Personal Relationships, 1, 391–398. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00072.x
15.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 972–994. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.972
16.
FeeneyJ. A. (2004). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 487–508. doi:10.1177/0265407504044844
17.
FisherH. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9, 23–52. doi:10.1007/s12110-998-1010-5
18.
GillathO.SchachnerD. A. (2006). How do sexuality and attachment interrelate? goals, motives, and strategies. In MikulincerM.GoodmanG. S. (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 337–355). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
HaddenB. W.SmithC. V.WebsterG. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 42–58. doi:10.1177/1088868313501885
20.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
21.
HendrickS. S.DickeA.HendrickC. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142. doi:10.1177/0265407598151009
22.
JonesJ. T.CunninghamJ. D. (1996). Attachment styles and other predictors of relationship satisfaction in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 3, 387–399. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00123.x
23.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B. (2008). Comparing MLM and SEM approaches to analyzing developmental dyadic data: Growth curve models of hostility in families. In CardN. A.SeligJ. P.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 165–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
KravetzS.DroryY.ShakedA. (1999). The Israeli Sexual Behavior Inventory (ISBI): Scale construction and preliminary validation. Sexuality and Disability, 17, 115–128. doi:10.1023/A:1021420300693
26.
LittleK. C.McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484–498. doi:10.1177/0146167209352494
27.
MikulincerM. (1998). Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 513–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.513
28.
MikulincerM.ErevI. (1991). Attachment style and the structure of romantic love. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 273–291. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00946.x
29.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York, NY: Academic Press.
30.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2012). Attachment theory expanded: A behavioral systems approach. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 467–492). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
PietromonacoP. R.CarnelleyK. B. (1994). Gender and working models of attachment: Consequences for perceptions of self and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 1, 63–82. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00055.x
33.
PistoleC. M. (1994). Adult attachment styles: Some thoughts on closeness-distance struggles. Family Process, 33, 147–159. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00147.x
34.
PistoleC. M.ClarkE. M.TubbsA. L. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 17, 199–209.
35.
RussellV. M.McNultyJ. K. (2011). Frequent sex protects intimates from the negative implications of their neuroticism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 220–227. doi:10.1177/1948550610387162
36.
ShaverP. R.HazanC.BradshawD. (1988). Love as attachment: The integration of three behavioral systems. In SternbergR. J.BarnesM. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 68–99). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (2006). A behavioral systems approach to romantic love relationships: Attachment, caregiving, and sex. In SternbergR. J.WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 35–64). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 279–328). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434
40.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.OriñaM. M.GrichJ. (2002). Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598–608. doi:10.1177/0146167202288004
41.
SprecherS.CateR. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 163–185. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00459.x
43.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
44.
SzepsenwolO.MikulincerM.BirnbaumG. E. (2013). Misguided attraction: The contribution of normative and individual-differences components of the sexual system to mating preferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 196–200. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.002
45.
TuckerJ. S.AndersS. L. (1998). Adult attachment style and nonverbal closeness in dating couples. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 109–124. doi:10.1023/A:1022980231204
46.
WillettsM. C.SprecherS.BeckF. D. (2004). Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within relational contexts. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
ZeifmanD.HazanC. (1997). A process model of adult attachment formation. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 179–195). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
