Some scholars have proposed that people in couples in which at least one person is secure are just as satisfied as people in which both members are secure (i.e., buffering hypothesis). The present investigation tested this hypothesis by examining how relationship satisfaction varies as a function of the attachment security of both dyad members. Secondary analyses were performed using data from two studies (Study 1: 172 couples; Study 2: 194 couples) in which heterosexual dating couples were asked to complete self-reports of their own attachment style and relationship satisfaction. To evaluate the buffering hypothesis, we fit a standard APIM using SEM and added an actor × partner interaction term to our model. Contrary to expectations, our results suggested that secure partners do not “buffer” insecurely attached individuals. Moreover, partner attachment did not explain satisfaction much above and beyond actor effects. This work addresses a gap in the literature with respect to the dynamic interplay of partner pairing, allowing scholars to better understand attachment processes in romantic relationships.
AllisonC. J.BartholomewK.MayselessO.DuttonD. G. (2008). Love as a battlefield: Attachment and relationship dynamics in couples identified for male partner violence. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07306980
2.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
3.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
4.
CohnD. A.SilverD. H.CowanC. P.CowanP. A.PearsonJ. (1992). Working models of childhood attachment and couple relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251392013004003
5.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363
6.
CrowellJ. A.FraleyR. C.RoismanG. I. (2016). Measurement of individual differences in adult attachment. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 598–635). Guilford Press.
7.
CrowellJ. A.TrebouxD.WatersE. (2002). Stability of attachment representations: The transition to marriage. Developmental Psychology, 38, 467–479.
8.
DavilaJ.KashyD. A. (2009). Secure base processes in couples: Daily associations between support experiences and attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 76–88.
9.
DiamondR. M.BrimhallA. S.ElliottM. (2018). Attachment and relationship satisfaction among first married, remarried, and post-divorce relationships. Journal of Family Therapy, 40, S111–S127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12161
10.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
11.
FeeneyJ. A. (1994). Attachment style, communication patterns, and satisfaction across the life cycle of marriage. Personal Relationships, 1, 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00069.x
12.
FeeneyJ. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00003
13.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP.RobertsN. (1998). Emotion, attachment, and satisfaction in close relationships. In AndersenP. A.GuerreroL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 473–505). Academic Press.
14.
FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
15.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625.
16.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
17.
GillathO.KarantzasG. C.FraleyR. C. (2016). Adult attachment: A concise introduction to theory and research. Academic Press.
18.
HaddenB. W.SmithC. V.WebsterG. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501885
19.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
20.
HesseE. (2016). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and selected empirical studies: 1985–2015. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment research and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 553–597). Guilford Press.
21.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C.BrumbaughC. C.VicaryA. M. (2014). Coregulation in romantic partners’ attachment styles: A longitudinal investigation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214528989
22.
JoelS.EastwickP. W.AllisonC. J.ArriagaX. B.BakerZ. G.Bar-KalifaE.BergeronS.BirnbaumG. E.BrockR. L.BrumbaughC. C.CarmichaelC. L.ChenS.ClarkeJ.CobbR. J.CoolsenM. K.DavisJ.de JongD. C.DebrotA.DeHaasE. C.…WolfS. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 19061–19071.
23.
KaneH. S.JaremkaL. M.GuichardA. C.FordM. B.CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Feeling supported and feeling satisfied: How one partner’s attachment style predicts the other partner’s relationship experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507079245
24.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
25.
KirkpatrickL. A.DavisK. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502–512.
26.
LemayE. P.Jr.DudleyK. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021655
27.
LiT.ChanD. K. S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1842
28.
LittleR. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
29.
MainM.KaplanN.CassidyJ. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333827
30.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
31.
MoleroF.ShaverP. R.FernandezI.Alonso-ArbiolI.RecioP. (2016). Long-term partners’ relationship satisfaction and their perceptions of each other’s attachment insecurities. Personal Relationships, 23, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12117
32.
MoleroF.ShaverP. R.FerrerE.CuadradoI.Alonso-ArbiolI. (2011). Attachment insecurities and interpersonal processes in Spanish couples: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 18, 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01325.x
33.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
34.
PashlerH.HarrisC. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401
35.
PietromonacoP. R.BarrettL. F. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409–1423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1409
36.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
37.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
38.
SchaffhuserK.AllemandM.MartinM. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1948
39.
ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.MikulincerM. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271709
40.
SimpsonJ. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.683
41.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
42.
SimpsonJ. A.OverallN. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510933
43.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434
44.
SimpsonJ. A.WinterheldH. A.RholesW. S.OriñaM. M. (2007). Working models of attachment and reactions to different forms of caregiving from romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.466
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
