Biological lay theories of race have proven to have pernicious consequences for interracial relations, yet few studies have examined how intergroup contact itself (particularly with those who naturalistically challenge these conceptions) affects beliefs about race. Three studies (a correlational study, an interaction study, and an experimental study) examine whether exposure to racially ambiguous individuals reduces Whites’ biological lay theories of race across time. Study 1 demonstrates that increased exposure to racial ambiguity across 2 weeks reduced White individuals’ biological lay theories. Study 2 shows that Whites who interacted in a laboratory setting with a racially ambiguous individual were less likely to endorse biological lay theories, an effect that sustained for 2 weeks. Study 3 finds that the reduction in biological lay theories after exposure to racial ambiguity is mediated by the tendency for Whites’ lay theories of race to conform to beliefs they presume racially ambiguous individuals hold.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
ChaoM. M.HongY.ChiuC. (2013). Essentializing race: Its implications on racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 619–34. doi:10.1037/a0031332
4.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 152–164. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.005
5.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219–231. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1503
6.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359
7.
DaCostaK. M. (2007). Making multiracials: State, family and the market in the redrawing of the color line. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Dar-NimrodI.HeineS. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818. doi:10.1037/a0021860
9.
FreemanJ. B.PaukerK.ApfelbaumE. P.AmbadyN. (2010). Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 179–185. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.002
10.
FreyF. E.TroppL. R. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 265–280. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_5
GoffP. A.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–27. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10774531
15.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11970776
16.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
17.
KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
18.
KroschA.BerntsenL.AmodioD. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113001054
19.
LeeJ.BeanF. (2010). The diversity paradox: Immigration and the color line in 21st century America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
LunJ.SinclairS.WhitchurchE. R.GlennC. (2007). (Why) do I think what you think? Epistemic social tuning and implicit prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 957–972. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.957
21.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
22.
MaddoxK. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383–401. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_4
23.
MorningA. (2007). “Everyone knows it’s a social construct”: Contemporary science and the nature of race. Sociological Focus, 40, 436–454. doi:10.1080/00380237.2007.10571319
24.
MorningA. (2009). Toward a sociology of racial sonceptualization for the 21st century. Social Forces, 87, 1167–1192.
25.
MorningA. (2011). The nature of race: How scientists think and teach about human difference. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
NoS.HongY.LiaoH.-Y.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991–1004. doi:10.1037/a0012978
27.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R.ApfelbaumE. P.PuraN.ArielyD. (2006). Color blindness and interracial interaction. Psychological Science, 17, 949–953.
28.
PaukerK.WeisbuchM.AmbadyN.SommersS. R.AdamsR. B.IvcevicZ. (2009). Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 795–810. doi:10.1037/a0013265
29.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. V. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02185.x
30.
PlaksJ. E.MalahyL. W.SedlinsM.ShodaY. (2011). Folk beliefs about human genetic variation predict discrete versus continuous racial categorization and evaluative bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 31–39. doi:10.1177/1948550611408118
31.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
32.
RangelU.KellerJ. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1056–78. doi:10.1037/a0022401
33.
RichesonJ. A.TrawalterS. (2005). Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 934–947. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934
34.
RobbinsJ. M.KruegerJ. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
35.
RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C. (2014). How accurate are metaperceptions of sexism? Evidence for the illusion of antagonism between hostile and benevolent sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 275–285. doi:10.1177/1368430213517272
36.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence (p. 644). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
StangorC.SechristG. B.JostJ. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167201274009
38.
ToosiN. R.BabbittL. G.AmbadyN.SommersS. R. (2012). Dyadic interracial interactions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1–27. doi:10.1037/a0025767
39.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 243–268. doi:10.1177/1088868309345850
40.
VerkuytenM. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 371–91. doi:10.1348/014466603322438215
41.
WilliamsM. J.EberhardtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–47. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033
42.
YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.WiltonL. S. (2013). At the crossroads of race: Racial ambiguity and biracial identification influence psychological essentialist thinking. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minorty Psychology, 19, 461–467. doi:10.1037/a0032565
43.
YzerbytV.RocherS.SchadronG. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In SpearsR.OakesP. J.EllemersN.HaslamS. A. (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
44.
ZitekE. M.HeblM. R. (2007). The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 867–876. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
