The present research examines whether people use racial contact to signal positive and negative social attributes. In two experiments, participants were instructed to fake good (trustworthy/competent) or fake bad (untrustworthy/incompetent) when reporting their amount of contact with a range of different racial groups. In Experiment 1 (N = 364), participants faking good reported significantly more contact with White Americans than with non-White Americans, whereas participants faking bad did not. In Experiment 2 (N = 1,056), this pattern was replicated and was found to be particularly pronounced among those with stronger pro-White bias. These findings suggest that individuals may use racial contact as a social signal, effectively “whitewashing” their apparent contact and friendships when trying to present positively.
AbeleA. E.CuddyA. J. C.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063-1065. doi:10.1002/ejsp.574
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000137
3.
AbersonC. L.ShoemakerC.TomolilloC. (2004). Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 335-347. doi:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.335-347
4.
Al RamiahA.HewstoneM. (2013). Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential. American Psychologist, 68, 527-542. doi:10.1037/a0032603
5.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ArmJ. R.HorneS. G.LevittH. M. (2009). Negotiating connection to GLBT experience: Family members’ experience of anti-GLBT movements and policies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 82-96. doi:10.1037/a0012813
7.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090-1112. doi:10.1037/a0030939
8.
BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.ThaiM.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). The wallpaper effect: The contact hypothesis fails for minority group members who live in areas with a high proportion of majority group members. PLoS ONE, 8(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082228
9.
BarlowF. K.LouisW. R.HewstoneM. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389-405. doi:10.1348/014466608X387089
10.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R. M.HarwoodJ.. . . SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629-1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
11.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
12.
Bradley-GeistJ. C.KingE. B.SkorinkoJ.HeblM. R.McKennaC. (2010). Moral credentialing by association: The importance of choice and relationship closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1564-1575. doi:10.1177/0146167210385920
13.
BrownR.EllerA.LeedsS.StaceK. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 692-703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.384
14.
CorriganP. W.WatsonA. C.MillerF. E. (2006). Blame, shame, and contamination: The impact of mental illness and drug dependence stigma on family members. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 239-246. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.239
15.
CrystalD. S.KillenM.RuckM. (2008). It is who you know that counts: Intergroup contact and judgments about race-based exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 51-70. doi:10.1348/026151007X198910
16.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332-351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
18.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
GriffithR. L.LeeL. M.PetersonM. H.ZickarM. J. (2011). First dates and little white lies: A trait contract classification theory of applicant faking behavior. Human Performance, 24, 338-357. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597475
20.
HodsonG.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2010). The aversive form of racism. In ChinJ. L. (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: A revised and condensed edition (pp. 1-13). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
21.
HorneS. G.RostoskyS. S.RiggleE. D. B. (2011). Impact of marriage restriction amendments on family members of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A mixed-method approach. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 358-375. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01702.x
22.
JinB. (2013). How lonely people use and perceive Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2463-2470. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.034
23.
MacInnisC.HodsonG. (2012). “Where the rubber hits the road” en route to inter-group harmony: Examining contact intentions and contact behaviour under meta-stereotype threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 363-373. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02014.x
24.
NeubergS. L.SmithD. M.HoffmanJ. C.RussellF. J. (1994). When we observe stigmatized and “normal” individuals interacting: Stigma by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 196-209. doi:10.1177/0146167294202007
25.
PaunonenS. V.LeBelE. P. (2012). Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 158-175. doi:10.1037/a0028165
26.
PettigrewT. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187-199. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002
27.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
28.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
29.
PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.MonroeA. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 224-241. doi:10.1037/a0026270
30.
RotenbergK. J.MacKieJ. (1999). Stigmatization of social and intimacy loneliness. Psychological Reports, 84, 147-148. doi:10.2466/PR0.84.1.147-148
31.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65-89.
32.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319-342. doi:10.1177/019027250406700401
33.
SchlenkerB. R. (2012). Self-presentation. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 542-570). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
SmithT. W. (2002). Measuring inter-racial friendships. Social Science Research, 31, 576-593. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00015-7
35.
StrueningE. L.PerlickD. A.LinkB. G.HellmanF.HermanD.SireyJ. A. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The extent to which caregivers believe most people devalue consumers and their families. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1633-1638. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1633
36.
SuttonR. M.RobinsonB.FarrallS. D. (2011). Gender, fear of crime, and self-presentation: An experimental investigation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 421-433. doi:10.1080/10683160903292261
37.
ThaiM.BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J. (2014). (Deviant) friends with benefits: The impact of group boundary permeability on minority group members’ responses to ethnic deviance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 360-368. doi:10.1177/1948550613499939
38.
ThaiM.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2015). Friends with moral credentials:Minority friendships reduce attributions of racism for majority group members who make conceivably racist statements. Manuscript under review.
39.
TongS. T.Van Der HeideB.LangwellL.WaltherJ. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
40.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951-957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
41.
WinslowM. P. (2004). Reactions to the imputation of prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 289-297. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2604_5
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
