This article investigates the phenomenon of interindividual rivalry and its consequences for motivation and task performance. Two studies of adults from the general population found that rivalry, as compared to nonrival competition, was associated with increased motivation and performance, controlling for tangible stakes, dislike, and other factors. Then, a large-scale archival study of long-distance running found that runners ran faster in races featuring their rivals, which were identified through empirical observation of demographics and prior race interactions. This research extends existing theory on competition and motivation and represents a first exploration into the consequences of rivalry between individuals.
BrehmJ. W.WrightR. A.SolomonS.SilkaL.GreenbergJ. (1983). Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 21–48.
2.
BrickmanP.RedfieldJ.CrandallR.HarrisonA. A. (1972). Drive and predisposition as factors in attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8(1), 31–44.
3.
BrittT. W. (2005). The effects of identity-relevance and task difficulty on task motivation, stress, and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 29(3), 189–202.
4.
DeciE. L.BetleyG.KahleJ.AbramsL.PoracJ. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79–83.
5.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
6.
DeutschM. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.
7.
EpsteinJ. A.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1992). Winning is not enough—The effects of competition and achievement orientation on intrinsic interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 28–138.
8.
ErevI.BornsteinG.GaliliR. (1993). Constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free rider problem: A field experiment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 463–478.
9.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
10.
GarciaS. M.TorA.GonzalezR. D. (2006). Rank and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 970–982.
11.
HofmannD. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.
12.
JamesK.GreenbergJ. (1989). In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual-performance and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 604–616.
13.
JohnsonM. D.HollenbeckJ. R.HumphreyS. E.IlgenD. R.JundtD.MeyerC. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 103–119.
14.
KahnemanD.MillerD. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
15.
KilduffG. J.ElfenbeinH. A.StawB. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally-dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.
16.
KohnA. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
LockeE. A.ShawK. N.SaariL. M.LathamG. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152.
18.
MedvecV. H.MadeyS.GilovichT. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medal winners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.
19.
MedvecV. H.SavitskyK. (1997). When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1284–1296.
20.
MillerL. K.HamblinR. L. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768–778.
21.
MurayamaK.ElliotA. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035–1070.
22.
MussweilerT.RüterK. (2003). What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 467–481.
23.
NeaveN.WolfsonS. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiology & Behavior, 78, 269–275.
24.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykT.CongdonR. (2008). HLM for windows 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
25.
ReeveJ.DeciE. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24–33.
26.
RijsmanJ. B. (1974). Factors in social comparison of performance influencing actual performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 279–311.
27.
SassenbergK.MoskowitzG. B.JacobyJ.HansenN. (2007). The carry-over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prejudice towards uninvolved outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 529–538.
ScottW. E.CherringtonD. J. (1974). Effects of competitive, cooperative, and individualistic reinforcement contingencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 748–758.
30.
SetaJ. J. (1982). The impact of comparison processes on coactors’ task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281–291.
31.
StanneM. B.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133–154.
32.
TauerJ. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2004). The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 849–861.
33.
TauerJ. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1999). Winning isn’t everything: Competition, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 209–238.
34.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181–227). New York, NY: Academic Press.
35.
TesserA.SmithJ. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 582–590.
36.
TriplettN. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.
37.
VallerandR. J.GauvinL. I.HalliwellW. R. (1986). Negative effects of competition on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649–656.
38.
WankelL. M. (1972). Competition in motor performance: An experimental analysis of motivational components. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 427–437.
39.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
