Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research has established that competing head to head against a rival boosts motivation and performance. The present research investigated whether rivalry can affect performance over time and in contests without rivals. We examined the long-term effects of rivalry through archival analyses of postseason performance in multiple high-stakes sports contexts: National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Men’s Basketball and the major U.S. professional sports leagues: National Basketball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), Major League Baseball (MLB), and National Hockey League (NHL). Econometric analyses revealed that postseason performance of a focal team’s rival in year N predicted that focal team’s postseason performance in year N + 1. Follow-up analyses suggested that the performance boost was especially pronounced when one’s rival won the previous tournament. These results establish that rivalry has a long shadow: A rival team’s success exerts such a powerful motivational force that it drives performance outside of direct competition with one’s rival and even after a significant delay.

Keywords

rivalry competition goal setting motivation interpersonal interaction intergroup interaction open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brennan

(2014, January 8). Florida Gulf Coast’s enrollment spikes. ESPN. Retrieved from http://www.espn.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/92235/fgcus-enrollment-did-exactly-what-youd-expect

Ciarocco

N. J.

Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2010). Some good news about rumination: Task-focused thinking after failure facilitates performance improvement. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 29, 1057–1073.

Converse

B. A.

Reinhard

D. A.

(2016). On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 191–213.

Deutsch

(1949). An experimental study of the effects of co-operation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199–231.

Forbes. (2016, September 7). Forbes releases 2016 MLS team valuations. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbespr/2016/09/07/forbes-releases-2016-mls-team-valuations/#6c3a47314f85

Gaines

(2014, May 14). CHART: NFL and MLB teams top premier league clubs when it comes to making money. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-nfl-mlb-premier-league-revenue-2014-5

Gaines

(2016, November 2). World Series TV ratings are soaring and Game 7 is expected to be a monster. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/world-series-tv-ratings-history-2016-11

Galinsky

Schweitzer

(2015). Friend & foe: When to cooperate, when to compete, and how to succeed at both. New York, NY: Crown Business.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Barron

K. E.

Tauer

J. M.

Elliot

A. J.

(2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.

10.

Heath

Larrick

R. P.

(1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109.

11.

Heitner

(2017, January 31). $4.5 billion will be wagered illegally on Super Bowl 51. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2017/01/31/4-5-billion-will-be-wagered-illegally-on-super-bowl-51/#55338f2c217f

12.

Helfand

(2016, March 18). Andy Enfield and USC agree to a two-year contract extension. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/sports/usc/la-sp-usc-basketball-andy-enfield-contract-extension-20160328-story.html

13.

Huddleston

Jr. (2017, February 6). Here’s how many people watched the Super Bowl. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/02/06/super-bowl-111-million-viewers/

14.

Insko

C. A.

Schopler

Graetz

K. A.

Drigotas

S. M.

Currey

D. P.

Smith

. . . Bornstein

(1994). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 87–116.

15.

Kahneman

Fredrickson

B. L.

Schreiber

C. A.

Redelmeier

D. A.

(1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405.

16.

Kilduff

G. J.

(2014). Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 944–952.

17.

Kilduff

G. J.

Elfenbein

H. A.

Staw

B. M.

(2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.

18.

Kilduff

G. J.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2017). The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 156–162.

19.

Kilduff

G. J.

Galinsky

A. D.

Gallo

Reade

J. J.

(2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1508–1534.

20.

Leach

C. W.

Spears

Branscombe

N. R.

Doosje

(2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932–943.

21.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

22.

Meier

B. P.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual–intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 551–559.

23.

NCAA.com. (2017a, April 7). 2017 Final Four viewership, attendance by the numbers. NCAA.com. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2017-04-07/2017-final-four-viewership-attendance-numbers

24.

NCAA.com. (2017b, March 27). 2017 NCAA tournament scores increases in television viewership through Elite 8, along with all-time records across digital and social platforms. NCAA.com. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2017-03-27/2017-ncaa-tournament-scores-increases-television-viewership

25.

Neely

(2012, September 17). Greatest Lakers rivalry: Larry Bird vs. Magic Johnson. Rant Sports. Retrieved from http://www.rantsports.com/nba/2012/09/17/greatest-lakers-rivalry-larry-bird-vs-magic-johnson/

26.

Novak

(2013, July 28). Ranking the 25 best rivalries in college basketball. Bleacher Report. Retrieved from http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1719358-ranking-the-25-best-rivalries-in-college-basketball

27.

Paine

(2017, March 3). UNC-Duke really is college basketball’s best rivalry. FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/unc-duke-really-is-college-basketballs-best-rivalry/

28.

Purdum

(2017, March 14). 70 million brackets, $10.4 billion in bets expected for March Madness. ESPN. Retrieved from http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/id/18901384/70-million-brackets-104-billion-bet-ncaa-tournament

29.

Rabbie

J. M.

(1998). Is there a discontinuity or a reciprocity effect in cooperation and competition between individuals and groups? European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 483–507.

30.

Redelmeier

D. A.

Kahneman

(1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.

31.

Rosenberg

(2017, April 4). UNC overcomes ghosts, pain, Gonzaga to reach its national title ceiling the Carolina Way. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved from https://www.si.com/college-basketball/2017/04/04/unc-national-champions-north-carolina-gonzaga-hicks-berry-roy-williams

32.

Kilduff

G. J.

Ordonez

Schweitzer

M. E.

(2017). Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk-taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0850

33.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.78 MB

The Long Shadow of Rivalry: Rivalry Motivates Performance Today and Tomorrow

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material