Two experiments examined how low and high self-esteem people regulate attention in the face of uncertainty about their partner’s caring. We primed risk regulation processes by leading experimental participants to believe their partner’s caring and responsiveness was in question. We then assessed directed attention to the partner’s positive and negative qualities using a dot-probe paradigm. High, but not low, automatically directed attention away from their partner’s negative traits in response to uncertainty.
Bar-HaimY.LamyD.PergaminL.Bakermans-KranenburgM.van IJzendoornM. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
3.
CameronJ. J.StinsonD. A.GaetzR.BalchenS. (2010). Acceptance is in the eye of the beholder: Self-esteem and motivated perceptions of acceptance from the opposite sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 513–529.
4.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ. G.RubinH. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 14–31.
5.
CavalloJ. V.FitzsimonsG. M.HolmesJ. G. (2009). Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 737–751.
6.
CavalloJ. V.FitzsimonsG. M.HolmesJ. G. (2010). When self-protection overreaches: Relationship-specific threat activates domain-general avoidance motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1–8.
7.
CavalloJ. V.HolmesJ. G.FitzsimonsG. M.MurrayS. L.WoodJ. V. (2012). Managing motivational conflict: How self-esteem and executive resources influence self-regulatory repsonses to risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 430–451.
8.
CavalloJ. V.MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (2013). Regulating interpersonal risk. In Simpson&J. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 116–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
DerrickJ.LeonardK. E.HomishG. G. (2012). Dependence regulation in couples: A prospective examination. Personal Relationships, 19, 644–662.
10.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.DeckmanT.RoubyD. A. (2011). Forbidden fruit: Inattention to attractive alternatives provokes implicit relationship reactance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 621–629.
11.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance following social exclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741.
12.
DreisbachG.HaiderH. (2008). That's what task sets are for: Shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72, 355–361.
13.
EastwickP. W.NeffL. A. (2012). Do ideal partner preferences predict divorce?A tale of two metrics. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 667–674.
14.
EdelsteinR. S.GillathO. (2008). Avoiding interference: Adult attachment and emotional processing biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 171–181.
15.
FletcherG. J.KerrP. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 627–658.
16.
FordM. B.CollinsN. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 405–419.
17.
FoxE.RussoR.DuttonK. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 355–379.
18.
GomillionS.MurrayS. L. (2014). Shifting dependence: The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 57–69.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships: Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 187–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
KelleyH. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
22.
KosterE. H.CrombezG.VerschuereB.De HouwerJ. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183–1192.
23.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting non-marital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
24.
LuchiesL. B.FinkelE. J.McNultyJ. K.KumashiroM. (2010). The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 734–749.
25.
MacLeodC.MathewsA.TataP. (1986). Attentinoal bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.
26.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.MillerS. L. (2009). The implicit cognition of relationship maintenance: Inattention to attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 174–179.
27.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.RoubyD. A.MillerS. L. (2007). Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401.
28.
ManerJ. K.MillerS. L.RoubyD. A.GailliotM. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 74–87.
29.
ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A.GonzagaG. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 343–349.
30.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ. G.RossM. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partner fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–248.
31.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ. G.RossM. (2010). Fostering relationship resilience: An intervention for low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 624–630.
32.
McGregorI.NashK. A.InzlichtM. (2009). Threat, high self-esteem, and reactive approach-motivation: Electroencephalographic evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1003–1007.
33.
McNultyJ. K. (2010). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 167–171.
34.
MoggK.BradleyB. P. (2002). Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1403–1414.
35.
MoggK.BradleyB. P.DixonC.FisherS.TwelftreeH.McWilliamsA. (2000). Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: An investigation using two measures of attentional bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 1063–1077.
36.
MoggK.PhilippotP.BradleyB. P. (2004). Selective attention to angry faces in clinical social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 160–165.
37.
MoskowitzG. B. (2002). Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 397–404.
38.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459.
39.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
40.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ. L.PinkusR. T.HarrisB.GomillionS.…LederS. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsve and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 485–502.
41.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.
42.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.
43.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (2000). Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 478–498.
44.
MurrayS. L.HomlesJ. G.GriffinD. W.BellaviaG.RoseP. (2001). The mismeasure of love: How self-doubt contaminates relationship beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 423–436.
45.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.MacDonaldG.EllsworthP. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubt turns into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459–1480.
46.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG. M.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556–573.
47.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ.PodchaskiE. J.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W. (2005). Putting the partner within reach: A dyadic perspective on felt security in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 327–347.
48.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–630.
49.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2009). When rejection-sensitivity matters: Regulating dependence within daily interactions with family and friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1057–1070.
50.
PietrzakJ.DowneyG.AydukO. (2005). Rejection sensitivity as an interpersonal vulnerability. In BaldwinM. (Ed.), Interpersonal Cognition (pp. 62–84). New York, NY: Guilford.
51.
ReederG. D.BrewerM. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61–79.
52.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
RusbultC. E.JohnsonD. J.MorrowG. D. (1986). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving on distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 744–753.
54.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A.WildschutT.YovetichN. A.VeretteJ. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521–545.
55.
VogtJ.De HouwerJ.MoorsA. (2011). Unintended allocation of spatial attention to goal-relevant but not goal-related events. Social Psychology, 42, 48–55.
56.
WeissR. L.HopsH.PattersonG. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing conflict: A technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In Handy&L. D.MashE. L. (Eds.), Behavior change: Methodology concepts and practice (pp. 309–342). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
57.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.