We conducted three studies to examine whether novel and interesting experiences can expand individuals’ self-concepts. In Studies 1 and 2, participants completed measures of experienced self-expansion and self-concept size. Results indicated that participants who had more novel and interesting experiences tended to have larger self-concepts. In Study 3, we employed an embodied cognition manipulation of self-expansion and again measured self-concept size. Results indicated that participants who pulled (vs. pointed to) objects labeled with novel and interesting (vs. nonnovel and uninteresting) activities toward themselves reported larger self-concepts. Additionally, those who pulled novel and interesting (vs. nonnovel and uninteresting) activities reported a larger self-concept. These studies provide the first empirical evidence that nonrelational novel and interesting experiences result in self-concept growth.
AronA.AronE. (1986). Love and the expansion of the self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere.
2.
AronA.DuttonD. G.AronE. N.IversonA. (1989). Experiences of falling in love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 243–257.
3.
AronA.LewandowskiG. W.JrMashekD.AronE. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp.90–105) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284.
5.
AronA.ParisM.AronE. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112.
6.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BernstonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.
8.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
9.
GrahamJ. M. (2008). Self-expansion and flow in couples’ momentary experiences: An experience sampling study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 679–694.
10.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the self-regard of public failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 274–280.
11.
HatfieldE.SprecherS. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.
12.
JostmannN. B.LakensD.SchubertT. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169–1174.
13.
KernisM. H.JohnsonE. K. (1990). Current and typical self-appraisals: Differential responsiveness to evaluative feedback and implications for emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 241–257.
14.
LandauM. J.MeierB. P.KeeferL. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067.
15.
LandauM. J.VessM.ArndtJ.RothschildZ. K.SullivanD.AtchleyR. A. (2011). Embodied metaphor and the “true” self: Priming entity expansion and protection influences intrinsic self-expressions in self-perceptions and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 79–87.
16.
LewandowskiG. W.JrAronA.BassisS.KunakJ. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13, 317–331.
17.
MarkusH.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
18.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (in press). An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.718863
19.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2013a). The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 12–22.
20.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (2013b). Broadening horizons: Self-expansion in relational and non-relational contexts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
MattinglyB. A.McIntyreK. P.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2012). Approach motivation and the expansion of self in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 19, 113–127.
22.
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
23.
OlkinI.FinnJ. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155–164.
24.
ReissmanC.AronA.BergenM. R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 243–254.
25.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2009). Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self-other integration between relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1137–1151.
26.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L.FinkelE. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147–160.
27.
XuX.FloydA. H. L.WestmaasJ. L.AronA. (2010). Self-expansion and smoking abstinence. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 295–301.
