Individuals in close relationships may perceive changes to their self-concepts as a result of being with their partners. According to the two-dimensional model of relational self-change, these changes occur across two dimensions, namely direction, which reflects whether the self-concept has gained or lost content, and valence, which reflects whether the self-concept content is positive or negative. These two dimensions combine to create four distinct self-change processes, whereby individuals gain positive traits (self-expansion), gain negative traits (self-adulteration), lose positive traits (self-contraction), and lose negative traits (self-pruning). Study 1 used a longitudinal design and revealed that changes in each of the four self-processes were associated with subsequent relationship satisfaction and commitment. To further investigate the association of self-change with relationship quality, Study 2 found that processes associated with self-concept improvement (i.e., self-expansion and self-pruning) were positively associated with relationship maintenance behaviors and motivations (e.g., accommodation, forgiveness, and willingness to sacrifice), whereas processes associated with self-concept degradation (i.e., self-contraction and self-adulteration) were negatively associated with these outcomes and positively associated with behaviors that may harm the relationship (e.g., dissolution considerations, attention to alternatives, and seeking revenge).
AgnewC. R.LeB. (2014). Prosocial behavior in close relationships: An interdependence approach. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.021
2.
AgnewC. R.LovingT. J.LeB.GoodfriendW. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 103–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.
4.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
5.
AronA.LewandowskiG. W.JrMashekD.AronE. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 101–132.
7.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284.
8.
AronA.ParisM.AronE. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112.
9.
ArriagaX. B.JonesM. D. (2004). Components of commitment in relational and organizational contexts. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University.
10.
DrigotasS. M. (2002). The Michelangelo phenomenon and personal well-being. Journal of Personality, 70, 59–77.
11.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.WieselquistJ.WhittonS. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 293–323.
12.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9, 239–251.
13.
FinkelE. J.MoldenD. C.JohnsonS. E.EastwickP. W. (2009). Regulatory focus and romantic alternatives. In ForgasJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M. (Eds.), Self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 319–335). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.
15.
GuerreroL. K.BachmanG. F. (2010). Forgiveness and forgiving communication in dating relationships: An expectancy-investment explanation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 801–823.
16.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
17.
KernisM. H.JohnsonE. K. (1990). Current and typical self-appraisals: Differential responsiveness to evaluative feedback and implications for emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 241–257.
18.
KowalskiR. M.WalkerS.WilkinsonR.QueenA.SharpeB. (2003). Lying, cheating, complaining, and other aversive interpersonal behaviors: A narrative examination of the darker side of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 471–490.
19.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
20.
LewandowskiG. W.AronA.BassisS.KunakJ. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13, 317–331.
21.
LewandowskiG. W.BizzocoN. M. (2007). Addition through subtraction: Growth following the dissolution of a low quality relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 40–54.
22.
LuchiesL. B.FinkelE. J.McNultyJ. K.KumashiroM. (2010). The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 734–749.
23.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2013a). An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 12, 621–634. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.718863
24.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2013b). The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 12–22.
25.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2014a). Broadening horizons: Self-expansion in relational and non-relational contexts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 30–40.
26.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr (2014b). Expanding the self brick by brick: Nonrelational self-expansion and self-concept size. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 484–490. doi:10.1177/1948550613503886
27.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.JrMcIntyreK. P. (2014). “You make me a better/worse person”: A two-dimensional model of relationship self-change. Personal Relationships, 21, 176–190.
28.
McIntyreK. P.MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.JrSimpsonA. (2014). Workplace self-expansion: Implications for job satisfaction, commitment, self-concept clarity, and self-esteem among the employed and unemployed. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 59–69.
29.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.
30.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.DoldermanD.GriffinD. W. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends’ perspectives to married partners’ views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 600–620.
31.
PaleariF. G.RegaliaC.FinchamF. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368–378.
32.
PinquartM. (2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 31–53.
33.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asympotic and resampling procedures for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
34.
ReissmanC.AronA.BergenM. R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 243–254.
35.
RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM. (2009). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305–309.
36.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
37.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
38.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2012). The dangers of dating the bad boy (or girl): When does romantic desire encourage us to take on the negative qualities of potential partners?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1173–1178.
39.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L.FinkelE. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147–160.
40.
SlotterE. B.LucasG. M. (2013). Validating a measure of self and partner change in romantic relationships: The perceived change in relationships scale. Self and Identity, 12, 177–185.
41.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. M.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
42.
VanderDriftL. E.AgnewC. R.WilsonJ. E. (2009). Nonmarital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: The mediating role of dissolution consideration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1220–1232.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
