Two studies investigated the experiences U.S. Asians and Latinos have with national origin identity neglect, which occurs when others fail to recognize distinctions among national origin groups that comprise the shared, pan-ethnic category. Participants considered situations in which another individual (1) failed to acknowledge or (2) appropriately acknowledged their national origin identity. Individuals in the neglect condition reported stronger negative emotions and partner evaluations. Conversely, participants in the recognition condition reported stronger positive emotions and partner evaluations. These effects generalized such that those who experienced neglect rated the partner’s ethnic group more negatively. The effects were stronger among those highly identified with their national origin group. Nearly all participants (91%) reported having experienced national origin identity neglect in daily life. These findings suggest that treating members of distinct social groups as interchangeable parts of a broader category, though seemingly benign, can elicit negative emotional responses and adversely affect intergroup relations.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629–639.
2.
BarretoM.EllemersN.ScholtenW.SmithH. (2010). To be or not to be: The impact of implicit versus explicit inappropriate social categorizations on the self. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 43–67.
3.
BourhisR. Y.MoïseL. C.PerreaultS.SenécalS. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386.
4.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. Eds., Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.
5.
CheryanS.MoninB. (2005). “Where Are You Really From?” Asian Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 717–730.
6.
Comez-DiazL. (2001). Hispanics, Latinos, or Americanos: The evolution of identity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 115–120.
7.
DeauxK. (2006). A nation of immigrants: Living our legacy. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 633–651.
8.
EllemersN.BarretoM. (2006). Categorization in everyday life: The effects of positive and negative categorizations on emotions and self-views. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 931–942.
9.
FuligniA.WitkowM.GarciaC. (2005). Ethnic identity and the academic adjustment of Adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 41, 799–811.
10.
GonzalezR.SirlopuD.KesslerT. (2010). Prejudice among Peruvians and Chileans as a function of identity, intergroup contact, acculturation preferences and intergroup emotions. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 803–824.
11.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242–256.
12.
HuoY. J.MolinaL. E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 359–376.
13.
HuoY. J.MolinaL. E.SawahataR.DeangJ. M. (2005). Leadership and the management of conflicts in diverse groups: Why acknowledging versus neglecting subgroup identity matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 237–254.
14.
OperarioD.FiskeS. (2001). Ethnic identity moderates perceptions of prejudice: Judgments of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550–561.
15.
PearsonA. R.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 314–338.
16.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
17.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2011). “What about me?” perceptions of exclusion and whites' reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 337–353.
18.
PostmesT.BranscombeN. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 735–751.
19.
SchildkrautD. J. (2011). Americanism in the twenty-first century: Public opinion in the age of immigration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
SearsD. O.FuM.HenryP. J.BuiK. (2003). The origins and persistence of ethnic identity among the “New Immigrant” groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 419–437.
21.
SidaniusJ.FeshbachS.LevinS.PrattoF. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 103–133.
22.
TaylorD. M.JaggiV. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attributions in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162–171.
23.
TormalaT. T.DeauxK. (2006). Black immigrants to the United States: Confronting and constructing ethnicity and race. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
WatersM. C. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
WohlM. J. A.GiguèreB.BranscombeN. R.McVicarD. N. (2011). One day we might be no more: Collective angst and protective action from potential distinctiveness loss. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 289–300.
27.
WrightS. C. (2009). Cross-group contact effects. In OttenS.KesslerT.SassenbergK. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of emotion and motivation (pp. 262–283). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
