Previous findings demonstrate that believing in the value of diverse groups is related to positive attitudes toward immigrants. Based on these results, we hypothesized that pro-diversity beliefs are negatively related to discrimination of immigrants. In a representative multinational survey study (Study 1; N = 6,500), we demonstrate that diversity beliefs of nonimmigrant citizens from seven different European countries are negatively related to their discriminatory behavioral tendencies against immigrants. Moreover, it is revealed that this relationship is mediated by reduced realistic and symbolic threat. These findings are replicated in an experimental study (Study 2; N = 64), which confirms that diversity beliefs causally influence discriminatory behavioral tendencies. However, in the economic context of Study 2, the relationship is mediated by realistic but not by symbolic threat.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
2.
BoboL.HutchingsV. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972.
3.
CoendersM.LubbersM.ScheepersP.VerkuytenM. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 269–285.
4.
DoosjeB.ZimmermannA.KüpperB.ZickA.MeertensR. (2009). Terrorist threat and perceived Islamic support for terrorist attacks as predictors of personal and institutional out-group discrimination and support for anti-immigration policies-evidence from 9 European countries. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 22, 203–233.
5.
GreenE. G. T.FaselN.SarrasinO. (2010). The more the merrier? The effects of type of cultural diversity on exclusionary immigration attitudes in Switzerland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 177–190.
6.
HomanA. C.van KnippenbergD.van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199.
7.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
8.
KüpperB.WolfC.ZickA. (2010). Social status and anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: An examination from the perspective of social dominance theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 205–219.
9.
LemmerG.WagnerU. (2011). The benefits of walking in the shoes of an out-group: A meta-analysis of information interventions to improve ethnic attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
LubbersM.ScheepersP.BillietJ. (2000). Multilevel modeling of Vlaams Blok voting: Individual and contextual characteristics of the Vlaams Blok vote. Acta Politica, 35, 363–398.
11.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
12.
PereiraC.ValaJ.Costa-LopesR. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231–1250.
13.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
14.
RichesonJ. A.NussbaumR. J. (2004). The Impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423.
15.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
16.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
17.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1969). Social psychology. New York, NY: Harper &Row.
18.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. M. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
19.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L.EssesV. M.StephanC. M.MartinT. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 1–19.
20.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
StephanW. G.YbarraO. Y.MartinezC. M.SchwarzwaldJ.Tur-KaspaM. (1988). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559–576.
22.
TaylorM. C. (1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512–535.
23.
TroppL. R.BianchiR. A. (2006). Valuing diversity and interest in intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 533–551.
24.
van DickR.van KnippenbergD.HageleS.GuillaumeY. R.BrodbeckF. C. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61, 1463–1492.
25.
van KnippenbergD.De DreuC. K. W.HomanA. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.
26.
van KnippenbergD.HaslamS. A. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend-exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In HaslamS. A.van KnippenbergD.PlatowM. J.EllemersN. (Eds.), Social identity at work-developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 61–80). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
27.
van KnippenbergD.HaslamS. A.PlatowM. J. (2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity and group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 11, 207–222.
28.
VerkuytenM. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138.
29.
WolfC.van DickR. (2008). Wenn anders nicht schlechter bedeutet–Wertschätzung von Vielfalt fördert Gleichwertigkeit der Gruppen [When different doesn’t mean worse. Valuing diversity facilitates equality of groups]. In: HeitmeyerW. (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände. Folge 6[German states. Sequal 7] (pp. 137–153). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
30.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635–654.
31.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.JrChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.
32.
ZickA.KüpperB.HövermannA. (2011). Intolerance, prejudice and discrimination–a European report. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
