Across 12 studies (N = 31,581), we examined how concerns about the rise of automation may be associated with attitudes toward immigrants. Studies 1a to 1g used archival data ranging from 1986 to 2017 across both the United States and Europe to demonstrate a robust association between concerns about automation and more negative attitudes toward immigrants. Studies 2a, 2b, 2c, and 3 employed both correlational and experimental methods to demonstrate that people’s concerns about automation are linked to increased support for restrictive immigration policies. These studies show this association to be mediated by perceptions of both realistic and symbolic intergroup threat. Finally, Study 4 experimentally demonstrated that automation may lead to more discriminatory behavior toward immigrants in the context of layoffs. Together, these results suggest that concerns about automation correspond to perceptions of threat and competition with immigrants as well as consequent anti-immigration sentiment.
AndrighettoL.VezzaliL.BergaminiG.NadiC.GiovanniniD. (2016). Inside the earthquake: Perceived disaster exposure and helping intentions among Italian and immigrant victims of the 2012 Italian earthquakes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 753–768.
2.
AnelliM.ColantoneI.StanigP. (2019). We were the robots: Automation and voting behavior in Western Europe (IZA Discussion Paper No. 12485). Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp12485.pdf
3.
ApplebaumH. A. (1998). The American work ethic and the changing work force: An historical perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
4.
ArntzM.GregoryT.ZierahnU. (2017). Revisiting the risk of automation. Economics Letters, 159, 157–160.
5.
BonnefonJ. F.ShariffA.RahwanI. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352, 1573–1576.
6.
BrambillaM.ButzD. A. (2013). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: Macro-level symbolic threat increases prejudice against gay men. Social Psychology, 44, 311–319.
7.
BrownC. (1998). Introduction: Labor, race, and class conflict in 1919. In BrucheyS. (Ed.), Racial conflict and violence in the labor market (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558.
9.
ButzD. A.YogeeswaranK. (2011). A new threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 22–27.
10.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25, 1189–1197.
11.
Dal BóE.FinanF.FolkeO.PerssonT.RickneJ. (2018). Economic losers and political winners: Sweden’s radical right (NBER Working Paper No. 115534). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
DiazP.SaenzD. S.KwanV. S. (2011). Economic dynamics and changes in attitudes toward undocumented Mexican immigrants in Arizona. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 300–313.
13.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.
14.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
16.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1236.
17.
FreyC. B.BergerT.ChenC. (2018). Political machinery: Did robots swing the 2016 US presidential election?Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34, 418–442.
18.
FreyC. B.OsborneM. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
19.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.TaberC.LahavG. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608.
20.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.
21.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 9079–9084.
22.
MaozI.McCauleyC. (2005). Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish–Israeli attitudes toward solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology, 26, 791–808.
23.
MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1648–1661.
24.
MutzD. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E4330–E4339.
25.
OlzakS. (1989). Labor unrest, immigration, and ethnic conflict in urban America, 1880–1914. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1303–1333.
26.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
27.
RiosK.SosaN.OsbornH. (2018). An experimental approach to Intergroup Threat Theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology, 29, 212–255.
28.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
29.
SherifM. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237.
31.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.MorrisonK. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
WeberM. (2013). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Abingdon, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1905)
YogeeswaranK.ZłotowskiJ.LivingstoneM.BartneckC.SumiokaH.IshiguroH. (2016). The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(2), 29–47.
35.
ZhenJ. I.MayerN. (2017). The losers of digitalization: A reservoir of votes for the far-right? In RheeY. (Ed.), The political economy of inequality and social integration (pp. 89–109). Seoul: Korea Economic Daily.
36.
ZłotowskiJ.YogeeswaranK.BartneckC. (2017). Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 48–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
