Previous research has demonstrated that anger increases the tendency to blame and punish others for harmful behaviors. This study investigated whether such attributions extend to judgments of criminal intent, and it examined the mechanisms by which anger influences punitiveness. In an experiment, angry, sad, and neutral participants read about an ambiguously criminal behavior. As hypothesized, angry participants judged the behavior as being more intentional and the perpetrator as having more causal control than did neutral participants, and they were more willing to punish the wrongdoer. Sadness did not have a demonstrable effect on judgments, indicating a specific role of anger rather than a general negative affect. Moreover, the effect of anger on punitiveness was mediated by perceived criminal intent but not by perceived causal control. Implications for legal judgments and theories of blame attribution are discussed.
AlickeM. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574.
2.
AskK.GranhagP. A. (2007). Hot cognition in investigative judgments: The differential influence of anger and sadness. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 537–551.
3.
AskK.LandströmS. (2010). Why emotions matter: Expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 392–401.
4.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BornsteinB. H.WienerR. L. (Eds.). (2009). Emotion and the law: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.
6.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2005). Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. In BussD. M. (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology handbook (pp. 584–627). New York: Wiley.
7.
FeigensonN.ParkJ. (2006). Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 143–161.
8.
GoldbergJ. H.LernerJ. S.TetlockP. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 781–795.
9.
GreeneE. (1999). The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors' judgments. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 331–348.
10.
KassinS. M.GarfieldD. A. (1991). Blood and guts: General and trial-specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on mock jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1459–1472.
11.
KeltnerD.EllsworthP. C.EdwardsK. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740–752.
12.
KeltnerD.LockeK. D.AudrainP. C. (1993). The influence of attributions on the relevance of negative feelings to personal satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 21–29.
13.
KuppensP.Van MechelenI.SmitsD. J. M.De BoeckP.CeulemansE. (2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 689–713.
14.
LagnadoD.ChannonS. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108, 754–770.
15.
LernerJ. S.GoldbergJ. H.TetlockP. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574.
16.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.
17.
LernerJ. S.TiedensL. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115–137.
18.
MalleB. F.NelsonS. E. (2003). Judging mens rea: The tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 563–580.
19.
MaroneyT. A. (2006). Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 119–142.
20.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
21.
QuigleyB. M.TedeschiJ. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1280–1288.
22.
ShaverK. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.
23.
SkovranL. C.WienerR. L.NicholsS. R. (2009). Sentencing decisions in first degree murder: The angry juror. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.
25.
TetlockP. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451–471.
26.
ThompsonC. M.DennisonS. (2004). Graphic evidence of violence: The impact on juror decision-making, the influence of judicial instructions and the effect of juror biases. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 323–337.
27.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
