Evaluative conditioning is the valence transfer from positive or negative stimuli to initially neutral stimuli through repeated co-occurrences of those stimuli. Theoretically, it should also be possible to condition non-evaluative attributes. Three experiments show the transfer of a non-evaluative attribute: By repeatedly presenting neutral people with athletic or nonathletic people, initially neutral people became more athletic while valence was controlled for statistically and experimentally. A fourth experiment generalizes the effect to shapes and nonwords as neutral stimuli. Athleticism transfer was found on direct ratings and indirect measures (a modified affect misattribution procedure and a categorical priming task). These data broaden the applicability of conditioning as a procedure for trait acquisition with important practical implications for advertising and brand image formation.
BatraR.HomerP. M. (2004). The situational impact of brand image beliefs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 318–330.
2.
ClarkH.ClarkE. (1977). Psychology and Language: An introduction to psycholinguistics.
New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
3.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20.
4.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
5.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (in press). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher-order encoding processes. Cognition & Emotion,
6.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2010). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS-US relations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2011). Formation of differentiated brand images through non-evaluative conditioning. Manuscript in preparation.
8.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421.
9.
ImhoffR.SchmidtA. F.BernhardtJ.DierksmeierA.BanseR. (2010). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition & Emotion.
10.
KimJ.AllenC. T.KardesF. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 318–328.
11.
LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1975). Classical conditioning of human “evaluative” responses. Behavior Research & Therapy, 13, 122–126.
12.
LunneyG. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 263–269.
13.
McNamaraT. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition.
New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
MeersmansT.De HouwerJ.BaeyensF.RandellT.EelenP. (2005). Beyond evaluative conditioning? Searching for associative transfer of non-evaluative stimulus properties. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 283–306.
15.
OlsonM.KendrickR.FazioR. (2009). Implicit learning of evaluative vs. non-evaluative covariations: The role of dimension accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 398–403.
16.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.
17.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.LuminetO.YzerbytV. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130–144.
18.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.LuminetO. (2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279–285.
19.
RhodesG. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.
20.
StahlC.UnkelbachC.CorneilleO. (2009). On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation trough evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 404–420.
21.
UnkelbachC.FiedlerK.BayerM.StegmüllerM.DannerD. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49.
22.
WaltherE. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919–934.
