A class of metaphors links the experience of anger to perceptions of redness. Whether such metaphors have significant implications for understanding perception is not known. In Experiment 1, anger (versus sadness) concepts were primed and it was found that priming anger concepts led individuals to be more likely to perceive the color red. In Experiment 2, anger states were directly manipulated, and it was found that evoking anger led individuals to be more likely to perceive red. Both experiments showed that the observed effects were independent of the actual color presented. These findings extend the New Look, perceptual, metaphoric, and social cognitive literatures. Most important, the results suggest that emotion representation processes of a metaphoric type can be extended to the perceptual realm.
AllportF. (1955). Theories of perception and the concept of structure: A review and critical analysis with an introduction to a dynamic-structural theory of behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.HeathertonT. F.TiceD. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
BrunerJ. (1951). Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving. In BlakeR. R.RamseyG. V. (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality (pp. 121–147). New York: Ronald Press Company.
4.
BushmanB. J.AndersonC. A. (1998). Methodology in the study of aggression: Integrating experimental and nonexperimental findings. In GeenR. G.DonnersteinE. (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 23–48). New York: Academic Press.
5.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.
6.
ChangiziM. A. (2009). The vision revolution: How the latest research overturns everything we thought we knew about human vision. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
7.
ChangiziM. A.ZhangQ.ShimojoS. (2006). Bare skin, blood, and the evolution of primate colour vision. Biology Letters, 2, 217–221.
8.
ColtheartV. (2010). Tutorials in visual cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
9.
DarwinC. (1899). The expression of emotion in man and animals. New York: D. Appelton and Company.
10.
DavidsonD. (1979). What metaphors mean. In SacksS. (Ed.), On metaphor (pp. 29–46). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
DrummondP. D. (1997). Correlates of facial flushing and pallor in anger-provoking situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 575–582.
12.
ElliotA. J.MaierM. A. (2007). Color and psychological functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 250–254.
13.
ElliotA.MaierM.MollerA.FriedmanR.MeinhardtJ. (2007). Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 154–168.
14.
ElliotA.NiestaD. (2008). Romantic red: Red enhances men’s attraction to women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1150–1164.
15.
ElliotA. J.Niesta-KayserD.GreitemeyerT.LichtenfeldS.GramzowR. H.MaierM. A. (in press). Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
16.
FettermanA. K.RobinsonM. D.MeierB. P. (2010). Anger as “seeing red”: Reaction time evidence for an implicit perceptual association. Submitted for publication.
17.
FreudS. (1926). The ego and the id. Honolulu, HI: Hogarth Press.
18.
FuhrerM.EriksenC. (1960). The unconscious perception of the meaning of verbal stimuli. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 432–439.
19.
GibbsR. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GoldsteinE. B. (1999). Sensation & perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21.
KatchadourianH. (1987). Biological aspects of human sexuality. (3rd ed.).
Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.
22.
KornblumS.HasbroucqT.OsmanA. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
23.
KövecsesZ. (1991). Happiness: A definitional effort. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 29–46.
24.
LakoffG. (1986). A figure of thought. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 215–225.
25.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
27.
MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.). (2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
MazurA. (2005). Biosociology of dominance and deference. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
29.
McRaeK.BoisvertS. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558–572.
30.
MeierB. P.HauserD. J.RobinsonM. D.FriesenC. K.SchjeldahlK. (2007). What’s “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 699–710.
31.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247.
32.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D. (2005). The metaphorical representation of affect. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 239–257.
33.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D. (2006). Does “feeling down” mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 451–461.
34.
MinskyM. (1988). A framework for representing knowledge. In CollinsA.SmithE. (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 156–189). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
37.
PashlerH. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
RobinsonM. D.MoellerS. K.GoetzP. W. (2009). Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 152–180.
39.
RobinsonM. D.ZabelinaD. L.OdeS.MoellerS. K. (2008). The vertical nature of dominance-submission: Individual differences in vertical attention. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 933–948.
40.
RussellJ.BarrettL. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819.
41.
SorianoC.ValenzuelaJ. (2009). Emotional and colour across languages: Implicit associations in Spanish colour terms. Social Science Information, 48, 421–445.
42.
StormC.StormT. (1987). A taxonomic study of the vocabulary of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 805–816.
43.
ThelenE. (2008). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. In WillisW. F.MüllerU.NewmanJ. L. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 99–129). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
WilkowskiB. M.MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D.CarterM. S.FeltmanR. (2009). “Hotheaded” is more than an expression: The embodied representation of anger in terms of heat. Emotion, 9, 464–477.
